2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum"Wanted: Young, feminist men. That’s who Hillary Clinton (and the rest of us) are desperate for."
Clinton's low polling with young people is more about young men not being feminist enough, not young women
AMANDA MARCOTTE
And now, even though the past 8 years have borne witness to an explosion of young women fighting for feminism, were being subjected to the same narrative: Older women are feminists, younger women are traitors, etc. Only just replace the word Obama with Sanders and you have the same story, as evidenced by a recent New York Times piece headlined Moms and Daughters Debate Gender Factor in Hillary Clintons Bid.
But, as John Sides at the Washington Post notes, the narrative isnt right at all. The real divide is not between mothers and daughters but mothers and sons. While its nominally true that Sanders polls better with under-30 voters of both genders, men of that age group are far more likely to oppose Clinton than women are. That gender gap starts to shrink with older cohorts. Sides created a chart with YouGov data:
https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=
http://tinyurl.com/qaq5o9y
djean111
(14,255 posts)Funny, my 20 YO grandson and his friends would have been just as happy to vote for Warren as they are for Bernie.
Just keep playing that gender card - it sounds like an excuse and deflection from the issues, as if Hillary is exactly the same as Bernie and O'Malley, except for gender. That is delusional.
cali
(114,904 posts)The author admits he polls better with young women than Hillary and still insists on her made up narrative.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)It is about the issues.
JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)And they're pretty uniformly for Bernie.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)That graph seems to indicate that the gender gap exists across different age groups. Maybe it is just that young people do not support her and in conjunction with the gender gap it makes it look as if young men are not feminist enough.
DemocraticWing
(1,290 posts)The fact that a gender gap exists is not surprising, but the story here isn't that young men are especially anti-feminist. It's that young people prefer Sanders over Clinton, regardless of our gender.
The gender gap, as the graph in the article shows, exists across all age group. I'm sure there are misogynists refusing to back Hillary out there, but claiming that young men are special super-duper misogynists is a claim that has no merit.
Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)I can't add anything significant to your succinct post.
Karma13612
(4,553 posts)yet here on the east coast.
thanks for this!
and my personal experience dovetails nicely with your assertions.
All ages and both sexes are supporting Bernie where I am, in a red-purple area of NY State
Its the message to which they are responding, not the gender.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)No, you (speaking to DSB and bloggers in general) don't get to decide how I make my decision. I make my decision based on the issues, not on candidate's gender. And Clinton is a manifestly poor candidate as compared to Sanders, on the issues. This OP/blog is lacking entirely of substance on policy issues, but has the gall to call young men not feminist enough? What a crock of caca de toro.
I'll even go further: the writer of this blog is sexist in her writing.
LettuceSea
(337 posts)Paints everyone in a bad light, and puts everyone into little demographic boxes.
vi5
(13,305 posts)Even over most men.
It's just that Hillary Clinton does not happen to be one of them.
MattSh
(3,714 posts)that they haven't yet alienated.
Keep it up Hillary. All true progressive will thank you for that.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)The glaring problem that jumps out from that graph is that HRC is doing a crap job of appealing to under 30 voters, not that "teh menz just don't like her".
Far be it for me to suggest that the candidate attempt to convince the voters to support her, rather than the candidate's backers insult various voting demographics for not getting on board.... but there are clearly some areas where HRC could speak to millennial concerns and she has flatly failed to do so.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)But yes, the gender divide between the candidates is overstated. It's largely an axe that Marcotte is grinding: i.e. "when Hillary wins it proves that democrats don't need men."
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/10/clinton-sanders-democratic-presidential-primary-caucuses/
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Thanks for sharing it.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)That would be an equally valid spin on the polling data.
Note to jurors: My subject line is not what I really believe. It's an absurd conclusion, offered only to show by analogy how absurd the linked article is.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)I am old.and i spend all my time around young people.at work
18-30
Cannot stand hillary but agree with bernie
The young men and women comi g of age today are wonderful. They are smart and they are inventive and they are better at being people than i and many others.
I am proud.to.be affiliated with them. They have beaten much racism and sexism just by being who they are and what remains they will teach their kids to beat.
I have grand children of that generation and they are the best.
If they dont like hillary her gender has little to nothing to do with it
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Last month you were shouting about the purity of your DNC cause because those icky, icky men were supporting Bernie.
"Lets storm the Sanders he-man women-haters club"
These gender dynamics could have an unfortunate downside, however. Sanders went after Clinton hard in his speech Saturday night, and his supporters cheered every word while the Clinton supporters sat in silence. Sanders supporters are a diverse crowd, but as Suzy Khimm of the New Republic notes, a huge amount of his support comes from an Internet-savvy, cantankerous crowd of young men. Its a crowd thats already swapping conspiracy theories about a media plot against their candidate,
<snip>
If Clinton wins the primary, the perception that a bunch of women, particularly young women, stole the election from Sanders is probably not going to sit well with this crowd. Who will no doubt angrily tell you that sexism has nothing to do with their rage, no sirree.
It's good that Amanda did, belatedly, learn some math; we're not winning the general election without male voters.
pnwmom
(108,990 posts)m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)as a friend to Rick Warren's congregation and voted for war in Iraq.