Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bakpakr

(168 posts)
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 07:04 PM Sep 2012

I stopped a birther rant dead in it's tracks today.

My client who I care for is a faux (news) entertainment network 24-7 watcher. Has totally bought into their views hook, line, and sinker.

Well today he got into a rant about President Obama being not being eligible to be president because he was born in Kenya. As he was ranting I broke into the rant with "Where he was born is irrelevant."

He stopped and says that it is relevant because you have to be a natural born citizen to be president. I asked him where President Obama's dad was born. He said Kenya. I then asked him where Pres. Obama's mother was born. He said here in the United States. I then said there you go, because that makes him eligible to be president. He said no it doesn't because he was born in Kenya. I replied with it does not matter where he was born. He could have been born on Mars. Because his mother was a US citizen and that under US law that makes him automatically a US citizen. He had no comeback for that at all. Stopped him dead in his tracks. I just sat there with a smarmy smirk on my face.

Section 1 of Article Two of the United States Constitution;

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

The weight of legal and historical authority indicates that the term "natural born" citizen would mean a person who is entitled to U.S. citizenship "by birth" or "at birth", either by being born "in" the United States and under its jurisdiction, even those born to alien parents; by being born abroad to U.S. citizen-parents; or by being born in other situations meeting legal requirements for U.S. citizenship "at birth". Such term, however, would not include a person who was not a U.S. citizen by birth or at birth, and who was thus born an "alien" required to go through the legal process of "naturalization" to become a U.S. citizen. http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42097.pdf

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I stopped a birther rant dead in it's tracks today. (Original Post) bakpakr Sep 2012 OP
The President was born in Hawaii same day as my eldest....n/t monmouth Sep 2012 #1
yes - have always wondered KT2000 Sep 2012 #2
George Romney was born in Mexico. JRLeft Sep 2012 #3
Can these people place the President's mother in Kenya? indie_voter Sep 2012 #4
"Completely removed the mother . . . from the equation" StatGirl Sep 2012 #30
He was right about not being able to be President. Cleita Sep 2012 #5
Did some checking bakpakr Sep 2012 #7
So you are saying I was lied to all these years. Cleita Sep 2012 #19
McCain was born in Panama NOT the canal zone either. He ran... Ecumenist Sep 2012 #23
So then he wouldn't be eligible would he under the rules I had to abide by? Cleita Sep 2012 #26
Actually bakpakr Sep 2012 #24
Oh okay, I missed that. Cleita Sep 2012 #25
No, you were not lied to, and you might not be eligible. (The birther in the OP was right.) Jim Lane Sep 2012 #31
Why? Where does it say that? renie408 Sep 2012 #20
That's what I was told, by the US Consulate since I was kid (had to get passport renewed there) Cleita Sep 2012 #22
He might complain and get you fired Warpy Sep 2012 #6
If he had been born in Kenya, he would not be eligible because both parents weren't citizens arcane1 Sep 2012 #8
it didn't have to be accurate it just had to scramble the birthers brain Heather MC Sep 2012 #9
See Text I was right. bakpakr Sep 2012 #11
Errm. Yeah. Except he was born in the US. Hawaii to be exact. geckosfeet Sep 2012 #10
McCain was born in Panama. Maine-i-acs Sep 2012 #12
The Congressional research paper is flawed -- for McCain unc70 Sep 2012 #13
Wasn't McCan't born in Panama? LibGranny Sep 2012 #14
McCain & Rmoney are of course eligable. baldguy Sep 2012 #15
Er umm..does the Constitution say you have to be white to be President? DippyDem Sep 2012 #27
No, but some are under the impression that that's the only thing that matters. baldguy Sep 2012 #28
And I remember when them talking about trying to over turn that natural born citizen requirement alphafemale Sep 2012 #16
Good for you. rMoney's got more of a problem with heredity than Obama does. HopeHoops Sep 2012 #17
My oldest brother was born in Italy. He was born in my mother's home at the time. My dad was in southernyankeebelle Sep 2012 #18
That's how it was in my house. Cleita Sep 2012 #21
When this came up early in McCain's candidacy, Congress passed a quickie law cr8tvlde Sep 2012 #32
When they show up here in D.C. screaming about being taxed enough already, my response... Liberal_Stalwart71 Sep 2012 #29
I have often wondered why the media Carolina Sep 2012 #33

KT2000

(20,581 posts)
2. yes - have always wondered
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 07:08 PM
Sep 2012

why this continues to be an issue. His mother was an American citizen which makes him an American citizen. If I recall - McCain was born in Panama and no one got their knickers in a twist over that.

indie_voter

(1,999 posts)
4. Can these people place the President's mother in Kenya?
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 07:11 PM
Sep 2012

At the time of his birth? Visa? Travel documents? Anything? When do they think she went there? Why would she leave her family to give birth somewhere completely foreign to her when she and her husband lived in the States?

It's as if they've completely removed the mother, you know the person giving the actual birth, from the equation.

StatGirl

(518 posts)
30. "Completely removed the mother . . . from the equation"
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 11:14 PM
Sep 2012

Conservatives have a lot of practice doing that!

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
5. He was right about not being able to be President.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 07:12 PM
Sep 2012

As a born American in a foreign country with an American parent, yes I had citizenship from the date of birth, however, unless you are born in an embassy or military base, or a territory like Puerto Rico, you cannot be President. I remember the US Consulate telling me that. Of course, he would add, since you are a girl, you won't be considered anyway. (This was back in the forties.)

I'm not telling you this to be a curmudgeon but just to correct an inaccuracy so you don't lose credibility for the correct things you did say.

bakpakr

(168 posts)
7. Did some checking
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 07:23 PM
Sep 2012

I was right you can be born abroad to a US citizen and still be President. See my edited OP above.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
19. So you are saying I was lied to all these years.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:38 PM
Sep 2012

I actually had to swear an oath to get proof of citizenship, just like aliens to get proof of citizenship. We didn't have to because many of us already had American passports, but it was to make sure just in case anyone in authority tried to question our legitimacy. The judge told all of us born abroad American kids there that we couldn't be President or Vice President. When did they change the rules?

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
26. So then he wouldn't be eligible would he under the rules I had to abide by?
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:58 PM
Sep 2012

I always questioned that. So does that mean that every kid born to an American father and foreign mother, or vice versa, in a war romance or just from casual sex over seas or across the border can also become President? Or, does that just apply to the ones who look and seem American?

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
31. No, you were not lied to, and you might not be eligible. (The birther in the OP was right.)
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 08:21 PM
Sep 2012

The law as of 1961 (when Obama was born), as to a child born abroad to a U.S. citizen mother and a noncitizen father, was that the child acquired U.S. citizenship at birth provided that the mother had lived in the United States for at least five years after attaining the age of 14. That meant that the mother had to be at least 19 years old. Obama's mother was only 18 when he was born. Therefore, if he had in fact been born in Kenya, he wouldn't have been a U.S. citizen at birth, so his place of birth is indeed relevant.

McCain, BTW, had two U.S. citizen parents, so this analysis is inapplicable to him.

Before you open your exploratory committee for your 2016 run, you should check on exactly what the law was when you were born. The law today is not what it was in 1961, and 1961 might have reflected a change from your birth year.

renie408

(9,854 posts)
20. Why? Where does it say that?
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:41 PM
Sep 2012

They posted the part of the Constitution that addresses eligibility and it doesn't say that anywhere.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
22. That's what I was told, by the US Consulate since I was kid (had to get passport renewed there)
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:49 PM
Sep 2012

and the judge when I was sworn in as a citizen for good. Back then we had to decide before we were eighteen if we wanted to remain US citizens or citizens of the country we were born in. The paper published in 2011 was about McCain and Obama. I think it wouldn't stand a test in the Supreme Court myself.

Warpy

(111,264 posts)
6. He might complain and get you fired
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 07:20 PM
Sep 2012

but yes, you gave him something to think about.

And just think, when you finally retire, you can be as rude to them as I am when they refuse to listen.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
8. If he had been born in Kenya, he would not be eligible because both parents weren't citizens
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 07:24 PM
Sep 2012

Since he was born in the US, the citizenship of his parents makes no difference.

The birther was full of shit, but your retort wasn't 100% accurate.

At least, that's how I understand it, I could be wrong

 

Heather MC

(8,084 posts)
9. it didn't have to be accurate it just had to scramble the birthers brain
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 07:29 PM
Sep 2012

mission accomplished!

it does not matter where he was born president Obama was born an American citizen

bakpakr

(168 posts)
11. See Text I was right.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 07:35 PM
Sep 2012

The Naturalization Act of 1790 stated that "the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens". (Act to establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization, 1st Congress, 2nd session, March 26, 1790, 1 Stat.L. 103 at 104, 2 Laws of the U.S., ed. Bioren & Duane (1815) 82 at 83.) This act was superseded by the Naturalization Act of 1795, which did not mention the phrase "natural born citizen"

If one parent is a U.S. citizen and the other parent is not, the child is a citizen if the U.S. citizen parent has been "physically present" in the U.S. before the child's birth for a total period of at least five years, and at least two of those five years were after the U.S. citizen parent's fourteenth birthday.

Immigration and Nationality Act § 301(g); 8 USC § 1401(g). For children born prior to the enactment of Public Law 99-653 on November 14, 1986, the citizen parent's U.S. presence requirement is ten years, of which at least five years had to have been after the parent's fourteenth birthday.

Not being an ass just want to give you correct info.

unc70

(6,114 posts)
13. The Congressional research paper is flawed -- for McCain
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 07:39 PM
Sep 2012

John McCain probably was not natural born. The weasel words in that report were to avoid having to deal with the issue back in 2008.

There were several RW original intent type law professors arguing that children of citizens born abroad were NB. While the SC has never ruled on that issue, I am quite sure that the Univ of Chicago guy is full if it. So is John Yoo.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
28. No, but some are under the impression that that's the only thing that matters.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:48 PM
Sep 2012

So the guy who was born in Panama, and the guy who's dad was born in Mexico will NEVER EVER, EVER, EVER have their eligibility questioned - because they are white. The issue doesn't even come up.

 

alphafemale

(18,497 posts)
16. And I remember when them talking about trying to over turn that natural born citizen requirement
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:19 PM
Sep 2012

You know, back when AwwwNold was on a roll.

Remember? Why should we unfairly exclude someone who exhibits the True American spirit and would be a great leader?

Because of a technicality.

 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
17. Good for you. rMoney's got more of a problem with heredity than Obama does.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:25 PM
Sep 2012

Oh, wait, rMoney's a rich white male. Never mind.

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
18. My oldest brother was born in Italy. He was born in my mother's home at the time. My dad was in
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:31 PM
Sep 2012

active duty in the army. He had duel citizenship. At 16 (I think) he had to decide if he wanted to be an american or Italian. My father told him he would be american, period. My mother also became an american citizen.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
21. That's how it was in my house.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:44 PM
Sep 2012

I had to swear allegiance to the USA and renounce the country of my birth when I was seventeen actually. My mother had also become a citizen long before then. I too had dual citizenship because the country of my birth didn't recognize that I renounced them. They said I had to be 21 to change my citizenship. Yet, it was understood that those of us not born in embassies, military bases or US territories could not become President. However, Obama born in Hawaii is full born citizen. McCain got away with it because the Canal Zone in Panama was an American possession at the time.

If that rule has changed, then hell with it, I'm running for President in 2016.

cr8tvlde

(1,185 posts)
32. When this came up early in McCain's candidacy, Congress passed a quickie law
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 09:08 PM
Sep 2012

that covered McCain. Helps to be wealthy, white and a Republican, apparently. It shouldn't, however, even be an issue.

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/28/senate-deals-with-mccains-citizenship/

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
29. When they show up here in D.C. screaming about being taxed enough already, my response...
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 11:07 PM
Sep 2012

...why aren't you marching in favor of D.C.? The residents are paying taxes with no representation!!

They have nothing back to say to me.

These people are modern day Klansmen. The birther thing is all about "the black guy". Period!

Carolina

(6,960 posts)
33. I have often wondered why the media
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 09:23 PM
Sep 2012

has never countered this birther idiocy with the fact that BHO's mother was a US citizen. But, of course the media has only fueled the flames, and the ignorance of the birthers is so deep that they either don't know that Hawaii was a state in 1964 or don't know that being born of a US citizen automatically confers citizenship regardless of the place of birth.

That this sort of ignorance on something so basic has proliferated unchecked speaks volumes... so sad. The US is on a downward, devolving spiral.

I am so glad you set your client straight.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I stopped a birther rant ...