2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe Bernie Sanders Campaign Has A Plan To Steal White, Working-Class Voters From Donald Trump
Dec. 29, 2015, at 6:59 p.m.
All the Democratic presidential candidates love bashing Trump, but for the Sanders campaign, its not just a play for headlines. Its a plan to poach white, working-class voters.
MUSCATINE, Iowa In the days before Christmas, Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders criss-crossed some of the reddest parts of Iowa looking for Donald Trump voters, especially men, to join his progressive political crusade.
<...>
But for Sanders, aides say, the fight with Trump is about a central plank of Sanders campaign. Its not often these days that one hears a Democratic politician make a direct play for older white male voters, but for Sanders, its becoming an increasing part of his rallying cry.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/evanmcsan/the-bernie-sanders-campaign-has-a-plan-to-steal-voters-from#.bmlWWQODR
Donald Trump supporters taunted and called for violence against a number of protesters at a tense rally in Las Vegas Monday night, reports from the scene say. BuzzFeed's McKay Coppins took a short video in which one man can be heard shouting "light the motherfucker on fire" as a black protester is being removed from the premises:
NBC's Benjy Sarlin says that one individual shouted the Nazi greeting "Sieg Heil" in the area of the same protester. Sarlin wrote that "Trump took the interruptions in stride and complained that they were the only way to get media outlets to turn their cameras towards his crowds to show off their size."
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2015/12/15/supporter_yells_sieg_heil_toward_black_protester_at_trump_rally.html
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)There must be a dozen OP's on this topic already. Trump supporters are *people*. Agree with them or not, we share this country with them and will have to work together in order to solve problems.
RandySF
(58,936 posts)Because burning black people is something on which we can just agree to disagree.
Look, there are definitely some sleazy people that support Trump, but I don't believe for one second that 40% of the Republican electorate are as bad as you just made them out to be. I know a few Trump supporters, and misguided they may be, they aren't racists and they certainly would never physically harm someone because of the color of their skin.
RandySF
(58,936 posts)Go wade into the pool of teahadhists and talibangelists and see what luck you have.
JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)You sound like they did about us in the 80s. Welcome to becoming the monster you sought to slay.
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)I have quite a few friends with whom I disagree with on political matters. It's amazing what you can accomplish when you sit down and have a reasonable conversation about the issues. A bit of friendly alcohol helps too.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)they picked people who do.
I'm not comfortable around people who are comfortable around those people - and I wonder why you would be.
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)I wouldn't be comfortable around KKK members, for example, or neo-Nazis. In other words, you probably wouldn't find me at a Trump rally. But those people aren't going to vote for Bernie anyway. There *are* a lot of people who support Trump that are just regular people with a different opinion on things. Maybe they don't pay as much attention to the news and don't even know about what goes on at Trump rallies. I'm willing to give people the benefit of the doubt, and if they come over and vote for Bernie how bad could they really be?
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)To you, it's a "different opinion." To me and many others, that "different opinion" is directly about and often directly affects me in deeply negative and painful ways.
Unlike you, I don't believe that voting for Sanders automatically absolves a racist of their their racism. A racist who votes for Sanders is still a racist.
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)Let me ask you this: Would you rather have them voting for Trump or voting for Bernie?
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)Rather than allow them to horn their way into our side of the aisle where they might actually develop some influence (and if you think they wouldn't, you haven't been paying attention). And if Sanders and the other Democrats reach out to and motivate the loyal base of non-bigots who have paid their dues rather than chase around after racists and xenophobes, they will earn more than enough votes to make sure that Trump doesn't come even close to winning.
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)We're back to square one, the Us and Them mentality. There is a reason this country is so divided on a number of issues, and I think you've just demonstrated it.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)Don't blame the country's divisions on decent people who don't want to cast our lots with bigots - you sound just like those who blame Obama for dividing the country because loud-mouthed racist white people can't stand him.
But if you want to join forces with them, be my guest. Just do your bonding with the bigots over at their house and keep them far away from me.
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)What would Jesus do? Just saying
MrWendel
(1,881 posts)WWBD?
RandySF
(58,936 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts).....to some Trumpeteers, but Bernie's actual platform has some socialist substance.
The Trump crowd has found a voice with their current candidate because he is validating their mysoginistic bigotry, they have no interest in actual policy....they are not likely to cross over.
I wonder why Bernie isn't wooing Carsons constituency instead? They seem much less violent.
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)In all likelihood Trump will be the Republican nominee. If Bernie is able to take even 5% of his support, think of what that will mean for the GE.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Much less convert to the side of a Democratic Socialist. 5% of Trumpeteers is unattainable.
Carson will be dropping out and those Carson supporters will be looking for a new home. Much more ripe for the picking.
And one more thing, I think you said something no other Bernie supporter has been willing to admit. This wooing Trump supporters has nothing to do with helping them attain a more enlightened frame of mind, it's all about getting more votes. Nothing noble going on at all, it all cheap politics.
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)First of all, if you really believe that no Trump supporters will vote for Bernie then why all the fuss about him trying to bring them into the party? If they won't do it then who cares? Secondly, I think you're being harsh on Bernie's motives. Obviously he's a politician, and all politicians seek to acquire as many votes as possible. However, I think what you'll find if you look at Bernie's history is that he has consistently sought out votes from Republicans or anyone else attracted to his message. In Vermont, where there are some staunch Republicans believe it or not, he typically received a large percentage of the Republican vote. He has made it one of his political missions to get working class Republicans to stop voting against their best interests. The reason I brought up the election strategy is because even if you don't buy the argument that Bernie is trying to change minds then at least admit that it will severely hurt the Republicans in future elections.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)the other candidates supporters, just Trump's. Interesting and strange . . .
Response to Sheepshank (Reply #17)
Post removed
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Are you making any moves at all to counter that bullshit? 'Cause Sanders is. That's the whole point.
RandySF
(58,936 posts)Not are they people I want to share a movement with.
TheFarseer
(9,323 posts)That like the message of we need an outsider that can shake up a corrupt system, but are not so keen on the over the top racism but don't know where else to turn. I like the idea of trying to appeal to them from the left side. I'll bet if you put a bunch of Trump supporters in a Sanders rally, you would get a lot of converts.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)With your thoughts that this is spin.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)As in, a car stuck in the mud, spinning the wheels and getting nowhere.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)We should have started a betting pool.
R B Garr
(16,954 posts)I remember many of their posts being hidden because Bernie fans didn't want to hear it, but they were exactly right.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Didn't work for HRC in 2008 and did a lot of damage.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Clinton appealed to racism. Angry black man tropes, muslim-scaring, "white people, hard-working people," the interesting implications of her pro-gun rhetoric at the time
Sanders is not doing this at all. Instead he's making a clear point that it's not some minority's fault you're getting screwed.
You understand the difference in the terms underscoring and undercutting, right? Etymologically similar, but very different words.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)In any case we'll know soon enough where the chips have fallen as the Iowa caucus is scheduled for Feb. 1.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)But hey, maybe I missed something. Can you show me proof of Sanders making an appeal to racism for Trump supporters, as you and Cali_Democrat are accusing him of doing?
The Wielding Truth
(11,415 posts)They said I was a pain for even asking and then it was banishment.It's a shame that when an accusation like this is made, it is a crime to ask for some evidence.
I just can't imagine that anyone who really knows the man could also make racist gestures in his name.
I would like the chance to blast that person who is making those comments but I am supposed to go a searching. I don't think the burden of proof should be on me. I didn't accuse anyone of such nasty rhetoric.
If you find anything or anyone lets you in on, it please post me.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)This sort of hit and run happens lots of times every day. It's going to get some attention now. Be able to back your words. Be ready to stand by your words.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)I realize you're butthurt about the TPP, but sending me to an article referencing a letter (both of which I read) that talks about the TPP to the USTR, NOT the President, does fuck-all to show racism.
If you're able to reason like an adult, get busy explaining how Sanders is a racist, but don't bring me some pile of shit worthy of a third grade writing assignment. Use reasoning. Use words. Explain why you've made such an offensive claim, and realize that the extraordinary claim you've made is going to need to pass muster with people who haven't been sniffing glue all their lives.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Have the force of character to mean what the fuck you say and be ready to stand behind it.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)You're going to need to learn to back your extraordinary claims. If you can't, that's what we call LYING. Get used to the caps.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)I want people to know that you engage in the destructive politics of accusing someone of racism without a SHRED of evidence to support it. Character assassination is ugly, ugly business, and it's what scumbag Republicans do. Don't bring it here; if you do, you'll be forever tagged with it.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Still waiting, floor is all yours.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/05/bernie-sanders-michael-froman-tpp_n_6419874.html
Not just this article, but the letter to Froman, the Twitter gifs, the speeches, rallies, and interviews, all questioning Obama's honesty and credentials in strongly emotionalzed terms. THAT is what is meant by dogwhistling.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)You can't back your claims up in either case.
Show me the appeal to racism. if it's there, you shouldn't have to be so evasive about it. Put your cards on the table.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)All you've showed me is Sanders complaining about corporations having greater access to the TPP negotiations than the US congress. You claim that this is proof of racism from Sanders.
This is literally the only thing you have used to try to back up your prior claim that Bernie sanders is making appeals to racism. The problem is that you are trying to use one unproven assertion to defend another unproven assertion.
"I know unicorns are blue because the easter bunny told me,' basically.
C'mon. You lcaimed sanders is appealing ot racism. Show me. we've been at this a whole subtrhead now and you've been holding out on me the whole time. let's see it.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)You then claim that this is proof of Sanders being racist. You then use that claim as your one and sole backing for your other claim that Sanders is appealing to racism.
Basically you are saying that Sanders is a racist because you've accused him of being a racist.
Show me Sanders appealing to racism, ucrdem. You've had a whole thread, and you're very confident in your claim. Show me.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Show me where Sanders appeals to racism.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)neverforget
(9,436 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Disrespect and antagonism, from HuffPo:
Dishonesty:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/05/bernie-sanders-michael-froman-tpp_n_6419874.html
neverforget
(9,436 posts)That is weak sauce. You should really stick to the economic arguments when trying to support your position.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)The party that Sanders claims to be a member of:
https://www.democrats.org/party-platform
And there's much more going on in Sanders' letter and the PR campaign it's part of than disagreement over economics. Did you read my post?
neverforget
(9,436 posts)other than your imagined slight.
And supposedly, Hillary is now opposed to the TPP after being for it. So, I guess she's against the Democratic Party Platform and the party to which Hillary belongs.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)with deceptive slogans and ads. How many hundreds of these did his PR office churn out, before he even declared, and who paid to place them?
neverforget
(9,436 posts)you stay quiet about the disagreement?
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/oct/08/hillary-clinton/hillary-clinton-now-opposes-trans-pacific-partners/
She was for it but now against it, supposedly. So, how does that play with you since you support the TPP and Hillary?
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)She's doing what she needs to do.
neverforget
(9,436 posts)confirming what I already knew. You know her stance against the TPP is bullshit just like I do. It's political expediency and she's not telling the truth.
But Bernie is the bad guy here because he's been consistently against it. Good grief.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Do you even know what a racist dog whistle is?
TM99
(8,352 posts)He is making up shit, throwing it against the wall, and hoping everyone is too stupid to realize his lies and distortions are weak sauce.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Unfortunately it looks more like projection.
neverforget
(9,436 posts)Hillary's own words about being against the TPP. But Bernie is the horrible, no good person for daring to oppose the TPP.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)The things you read on DU...
pa28
(6,145 posts)A link that does nothing to explain your charge really isn't good enough. Please justify your charge.
pa28
(6,145 posts)Good night.
Good night.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)But I believe he'll fail. The White working-class voters panting after Trump are White supremacists, bigots, misogynists, racists, nationalists, and xenophobes. One mention that Sanders is Jewish, is pro-choice, is a socialist is enough to make them pointy heads explode. If he can avoid the above, he just might have a chance, especially if he touts his NRA creds.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Cha
(297,326 posts)Turns out that's in Chicago. No pics of Bernie and Dr. King together that I know of. And Bernie himself says he only watched, from "way way back there" on the Mall, in 1963:
Cha
(297,326 posts)back then.
I just happened to catch the post.. I don't really look at a lot of stuff like that.
But, I just imagined that all the talk about marching with Dr King was a real thing even though it isn't the end all and it wasn't what #BLM activists and supporters needed to know today.. as in what are we doing about Racial Injustice NOW.
Response to Empowerer (Reply #26)
Post removed
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)But thanks for the chuckle . . .
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)activist as a "subhuman Republican piece of shit" a few months ago.
Hard to believe that anyone that "gives so much of a shit" about civil rights and thinks that they are so terribly important would think that the people who are actually out there fighting for them aren't even human.
Cha
(297,326 posts)there's one serial alerter going around calling everything "oot" sic) but the
"subhuman" post was despicably Over The Top.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Sanders, and it appears his supporters are happy to include racists as part of the fold.
This is NOT the face of the Democratic Party. Racists should be shunned not courted.
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)Well said.
And we really are looking at desperation here.
From the beginning, we were told that Bernie's support would hit dizzying heights among Democrats, liberals, progressives. And now we're being told (albeit inadvertently) that BS's appeal among those folks isn't as was first hoped, and very vocally advertised.
So now it's necessary to go slummin', and try to pick up a few votes among Trump's racist followers in order to get past the 30% ceiling - while doing so is being promoted as a valiant effort to reach across the aisle.
If BS thought there was any chance of garnering the support he needs to win the nomination among Democrats, he would not be looking elsewhere for votes.
Tom Rinaldo
(22,913 posts)I have seen no sign of that at all, only the opposite; calling out of racism. I do hear economic sirens at use though. Progressive organizers, including MLK Jr. have always courted "racists". Not hard core committed racists of course, and not by appealing to their racist indoctrination, but by exposing the divide and conquer motivation of those who seek to create divisions among people with common interests by inflaming racial tensions born by ignorance that cause them to fight each other rather than those who profit by their division.
America has become less racist over long decades in large part because of the ongoing work done by many to defeat racism by slowly transforming those infected by it. It is essential and difficult work. The fact that it is difficult does not make it less essential to our societal transformation. It can only be done if racism is openly condemned, not tolerated, in the process. From everything I have seen Berni Sanders holds true to that principle. Unless you can prove otherwise this is a disingenuous and ultimately counter productive to our goals and values line of attack against Sanders.
pa28
(6,145 posts)Seems like a rather scummy thing to post but I've noticed many of your posts are divisive in this kind of way.
DJ13
(23,671 posts)Are they held under lock and key with no free will of their own?
azmom
(5,208 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,370 posts)Last edited Wed Dec 30, 2015, 01:17 AM - Edit history (1)
weaken Trump's racist, hate filled campaign!?
Thanks for the thread, Cali_Democrat.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)their better selves and their are leaders who can turn a population towards their better selves.
Uncle Joe
(58,370 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)I hope he keeps having diarrhea of the mouth! Payne said of Trump. It just helps Bernie.
LuvLoogie
(7,014 posts)Bernie will have to pit his economics against Trump's. How receptiveTrump's voters will be to Tax & Spend has yet to be seen. Given that Trump voters are motivated by negativity, and the Sanders campaign seeks to develop discontent into a political revolution, I see Sanders field operatives working the Trump voters with anti-Hillary rhetoric while Sanders is on stage talking economics.
There will be a cell phone video on the internets.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Lucky Luciano
(11,257 posts)He wants to get those supporters of Trump's (peeling off 15% of trump's supporters would be a win) that might r direct their anger at the right people with s little education.
Most of trump's supporters are knuckledraggers, but he only needs done if them - not nearly all.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)they'll suddenly see the light?
Okaaayyyy . . .
LuvLoogie
(7,014 posts)Not an economic message.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)than hate.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)Here's a clue - it's been tried but ... it ... doesn't ... work - precisely because these people already know they're voting against their economic interests and ... they ... don't ... care.
They vote the way they do because Trump and his ilk satisfy their most important concern - confirming their illusion of racial superiority and belief that, no matter how screwed up their economic prospects are, there will always be someone they can look down upon. Unless Sanders can promise them that, they will not support him, regardless how much he "pushes back."
LuvLoogie
(7,014 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)She's been doing it this entire election cycle. Obama has been as well.
Why aren't you paying attention?
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/videos/news/elections/presidential/caucus/2015/12/23/77789406/
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)yucking it up at his wedding.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Good luck with that!
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)Ha! She trolled for the kind of people this OP accusses Bernie of. Remember Super Tuesday?
But she wanted them with all their fear, the guns and bibles and appealed to that aspect.
Bernie wants them to remember what they hoped for, for themselves, their family, this country. When the system was rigged for the regular person who put in their time, their effort and had something.
He is appealing to those who worry about the present, let alone the future. Some who got sick, some who lost jobs, some who lost homes. What can he offer them?
That if we work together, we can build each other up.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Not surprising. It's all you folks have apparently. Smear jobs.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)I will never forgive them for suppressing the 4th part of the second Dem debate.
Thankfully, people like yourself were on to them.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)nt
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)tblue37
(65,412 posts)who vote from fear, who have been blinded by incessant propaganda,and who have been alienated so badly by both parties that they are easy pickings for a bombastic authoritarian fool like Trump. Careful wooing by a candidate like Bernie could lure them back to the light side of the Force.
Cha
(297,326 posts)Response to Cha (Reply #97)
neverforget This message was self-deleted by its author.
Truprogressive85
(900 posts)You support a woman who exploited the fear of a black man ,in order to white win votes
Remember how Hillary Clinton said :
found how Senator Obamas support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again, and how whites in both states who had not completed college were supporting me was better for white working class voters than Obama
Her faux outrage when Obama was caught on tape saying " They cling to their guns and Religion
and her countless surrogates with some subtle and some upfront racist comments towards than Sen. Obama
but we are suppose to forget that huh because well she a Democrats right and according to some Democrats cant be racist or bigots
In words of Deray : "Watch whiteness work"
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Truprogressive85
(900 posts)This what a Clinton supporter said in 2015
Kathleen Kelley, a businesswoman in northern New Hampshire, opens a Clinton event w/ this: "Unlike Obama, Hillary respects rural America."
Is this lady suggesting doesn't care about rural America ? really lol
Translation = Obama doesn't care about white folks
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)I find it despicable that they think any race of people are so gullible.
Cha
(297,326 posts)going after teabaggers for ted?
neverforget
(9,436 posts)"I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on," she said in an interview with USA TODAY. As evidence, Clinton cited an Associated Press article "that found how Sen. Obama's support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again, and how whites in both states who had not completed college were supporting me."
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Did you forget that?
Cha
(297,326 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Cha
(297,326 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Truprogressive85
(900 posts)Bad Dog
(2,025 posts)I once read an article in the Guardian, (sorry I can't find it) about hard left skinheads. What a lot of people don't realise is that the skinhead movement originally formed in Britain when white youths started to socialise with immigrants from the West Indies. The result is Ska music which is a fusion of black and white cultures.
Somewhere along the way right wing extremists took over some skinheads, but not all. There are a lot of genuine Ska loving skinheads still about. A lot of them used to drink in one of the local bunch, they'd turn up on masse riding their Lambrettas, a very scary looking bunch, but really nice when you got to know them.
I went on a protest march in nearby Winchester at Hampshire bus services because they were employing one of the deeply racist, and now defunct, National Front's deputies as a bus driver. There was a small counter demonstration by right wing skinheads, but they were dwarfed by the amount of skinheads in our ranks demanding that this racist be kicked out.
What the article said, which was echoed by a lot of left wing skinheads, is that right wing extremists are actually the easiest to turn. They're pissed off with their lack of opportunity and mistakenly blame immigrants for that instead of the real culprits, robber baron capitalists. Once educated it's quite easy to redirect that hate.
Maybe Sanders is just taking a leaf out of the skinhead's books. After all it's inconceivable that most poorly educated, low income, uninsured teabaggers would actually vote for a system that made them even worse off, but they do.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)My Good Babushka
(2,710 posts)they can't really be "stolen" but they can be influenced. If he can convince the working poor that he's got something in his platform for them, if he can underline the fact that our two-party choices have been between "nothing for the workers" and "a crumb for the workers after the wealthy get slaked with the majority of benefits", and show how the legislation he wants will be different, then he will get those votes.
There is a deep schism in the democratic party, working class people are tired of starving, I think. Whether you are starving by republican design that favors trickle down, or are starving by democratic design which favors what it calls "third way pragmatism", the end result is the same, there have been decades of legislation that is geared toward the benefit of the investor class, coming from both sides. There are factions in both parties that are deeply unsatisfied with this.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)This is not a good faith post. It is dishonest and disruptive.
@SenSanders
I have a message for Donald Trump: No, were not going to hate Latinos, were not going to hate Muslims, we are going to stand together.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts).