= new reply since forum marked as read
Lies... meaning anything that doesn't fit the inevitable narrative. 
Cuz he doesn't swoon for Hillary?
Thanks for that gem.
Like those who think boots on the ground in Syria is good for the country.
Or that Big Banks weren't a big deal in the lousy economy.
"with his support of Nader: He handed the country to Bush."
You just lost any thinking person's support with that crap.
You heard it here folks! Hartman is the reason we had Bush!
its crazy talk! 
love Thom Hartmann, btw...he's awesome!
i wish these people would crawl back under their rock if they can't offer reasonable discussion.
He is also a paid Putin propagandist as he has a show on RT. He must secretly support the Russian oligarchy and has been faking his librul beliefs all this time. This means, like Putin, he also admires Trump. Its so obvious.
.
so that tRump can win and make Putin VP!
The usual quote of being out in left field felt, to me, more like an implied compliment when viewed in the context of the political spectrum. I felt this was especially true as I've never seen anyone but a right-winger attack Thom Hartman the way lewbely3 did.
So, saying he was out in right field was a nod to the saying while also stating that the attack was more consistent with right-wing ideology. It was a wee bit obtuse on my part... but it was one of those moments where the concept crystalized in my head, and I just kinda had to go with it.
Either way, I appreciate your intent. Thanks! 
I am so sick of this false Nader bullshit coming up again and again.
That undercuts your "Yes they are!" exclamation since most Sanders supporters were not old enough to vote for McGovern or Mondale.
I'm unclear as to what your issue with those two men is either.....
Essentially you have presented no facts that back up your 'assertions' in this thread.
Just an incomprehensible word salad of bullshit.
Try to stay on topic here.
What were you trying to say about young Sanders supporters voting for Nader, McGovern, and Mondale?
You're all over the place on this and seen to have a lack of understanding of both recent American history and the political process.
And what happened to you over the last month or so?
You used to write in coherent sentences.
Now you have out of place words and your sentence structure is garbled.
The word salad? The ahistorical statements?
Response to lewebley3 (Reply #17)
Pot. Kettle. 
And I've finally had a bellyful. Had you on ignore and GD: P trashed until I got called to jury one of your particularly acidic posts in GD
.
In any event, since your posts to and about Bernie supporters have been so very consistent, I do get your approval of consistency. Bear in mind what Emerson said, though.
It's as though I knew prematurely you've have nothing of interest to say...
Reading now...
Right. I'm sure there is something interesting in all of that tangle of words but I got caught up in the "USED to have me on ignore." Would be immensely obliged if that were to change pronto. Gracias!
Oh, and that goes QUADRUPLE for the little hanger on-er that always shows up in threads to high five anyone that tries to come after me but yet, never seems capable of doing so himself. Not that I'm complaining (or even all that interested) either way.
One of my favorite quotes from Emerson! 
Nicely played!
Keep trying, dear. And maybe, JUUUUUST maybe, you'll get somebody to buy that faux concern one day.
and now you've got it. The idea that you think you can tell me or anyone else here what to do is simply PRECIOUS and beyond adorable, particularly when you initiated this idiotic and pointless conversation.
Don't like it, float on, dearie. And everyone here has seen your unhinged attacks against Black Lives Matter members so I have no idea why you are going the "who me??" route.
I thought the exchange with that other poster upthread was going to be the dumbest, most excruciatingly unnecessary exchange I was going to have today!! You have already run RINGS around that bit of nothing! 
Looking at your comments, it'd be more than reaching to come to that conclusion. What I do find is that you've chosen to leap to the defense of the third way. Lovely to see you've added yourself to this dubious list.
And if you think that implying that I called or agree with calling someone "subhuman" because your upset your precious third way support and lack of civility has been challenged, then I am beyond glad that you leapt into this thread for the sole purpose of letting everyone know where your allegiances lie, and that you'll gladly seek to conflate one person's statements as being another's.
It's too bad that woman chose the actions she did. Bernie and the Host were trying to be accommodating... but she wasn't interested in that so much as trying to create a scene and to offend people. Kinda reminds me of what you're doing right now.
Thanks so much for chiming into this thread. I have never seen you before either. And since I suffer trollish behavior poorly, I see it was for good reason. I also know what to expect from you, and promise you'll be on my short list of candidates to be blocked should that style of discussion from you continue.
Have a great day!
your made up, BS claim that I "defended" the Third Way.
You've already said everything that needed to be said about you. And best of all, you showed everyone who you are without even being asked. Well done.
Edit: And for shits and giggles just checked your favorite group on your profile. Gee, no surprises there. None at all.
out of your backside. Props on the progress, no matter how small.
But it's hilarious that you have chosen to leap to the defense of a poster who called a black Black Lives Matter activist "subhuman" -- which you have made it ABUNDANTLY clear you have no issue with and couldn't care about in in the least -- while simultaneously wailing and howling over me calling that same poster "dear."
I have absolutely no idea how you think this conversation makes you look good. Your loud, clear, UNEQUIVOCAL defense of that person calling an activist "subhuman" because she said or did something mean to Bernie Sanders has said every thing that needs to be said about you. An intelligent person would have realized that and stopped by now.
Edit: Oh and let's copy your post where you very clearly defended the calling of a BLM activist subhuman just in case you "accidentally" hit that self delete button:
Bubzer (1,773 posts)
221. Asking for civility is surreal, hypocritical and boring? And all while being hypocritical yourself.
You're odd dichotomy of surreal being boring aside, you object to someone else's name calling but insist on doing it yourself.
I suppose you think the black protestor in question should be granted respect, in spite of her disrespect shown by calling everyone at a Bernie Sanders rally "liberal white racists"? Or, for that matter, the way she literally jumped up and down on stage and screamed her demands at the host, all while the host was trying to relay to the crowd that he was going to give her time to speak? How about the way she failed to denounce her cohort for physically pushing Bernie Sanders (which is assault and a federal offense)?
I do not and will not respect Marissa nor her cohorts. They are NOT representative of the movement for equal rights for PoC, regardless of if the leader of the "leaderless" BLM, Patrisse, post-hoc included them as part of BLM or not.
That someone else has strong feelings toward those protestors does not justify your disrespect. Call them on it, by all means, but derisive name calling simply justifiable.
Definitely warrants calling someone "subhuman." Absolutely. Like I said, hopefully she's learned her lesson and is one of the "good ones" now.
... ... ... ... ... ... ......
Okay. Your hypocrisy is just too much. I'm done with you.
You could practically SMELL the rage coming off my post when I asked those, what ten words in my initial post!!one
I'm done with you
Thank the Lord. But you've been done waaaaayyy longer than you seem to realize.
You better believe that. And I'm not talking about the banned poster since I saw you try that in your response to this post.
And I think it's hilarious that you're trying to pretend that you won't put me on ignore because that somehow then "forces" you to read my posts when they are apparently, inevitably juried on. That is absolutely too precious.
But thanks for the heads up, no matter how absurd. I've had a couple of empty spaces on my jury blacklist for a very long time and perhaps it's time for an update.
But I'd be extremely happy with you putting me on ignore. Like, OVERJOYED happy.
Adding me to your black list is probably a very nice (and now probably very necessary) extra bit of protection.
What is going on with you? Do you not understand what "goodbye" and "nighty nite" mean in the context of the English language??
And my comments are not saying that you cannot respond to me. My bewilderment is that you KEEP responding to me even after MULTIPLE proclamations that you are not going to continue doing so and that you once had me on ignore so that you wouldn't have to read what I write but now seem to be going OUT OF YOUR WAY to not only read what I write but keep responding to it when you CLEARLY have nothing interesting to say.
For God's sake, use your jury blacklist and ignore like you said THREE POSTS AGO that you were going to. This has gone from pointless and stupid to simply bizarre now. I am 
ing and ing at the same time. This is absolutely BIZARRE. If your intent with all of this was to prove that I was wrong about the caliber of Sanders supporters that you represent, you have failed deeply, truly and HILARIOUSLY.
Or is there some new rule that only Hillary supporters can insert themselves into conversations?
WTF was that hot mess?
I just scanned this little tag team showdown, and like you, I'm wiping away the tears.
WTF was that??
Girl, I just gotta say...if that wasn't the finest demonstration of your point, I don't know what it would be.
All I know is that apparently, a bellyful was had.
better than a HALF DOZEN Sanders supporters trying to crawl up and down my backside for daring to question why someone more or less demanded that someone else leave DU because of a Third Way pic in their sig line -- all while pretending that the nasty and unnecessary request was "polite," that calling someone "dear" is far, FAR worse than calling someone "subhuman," and pointlessly announcing that I used to be on ignore but then denying my genuine and heartfelt pleas for them to put me BACK on ignore 
. And the sad little high five from the ever present member of the Peanut Gallery was the precious little cherry that this Sundae of Senselessness needed.
Got called uppity, I mean "imperious" AND haughty. A Hillary supporter (as per usual. And funnily enough, that "insult" from them is clearly the strongest arrow in their quiver) and a "defender" of the ubiquitous Third Way. It's been a hell of a good time. And I'm sure these same folks will continue to furrow their brows, forever quizzical why they make up the vast majority of tombstoned posters, timed out posters or people unable to serve on juries.
Sorry this post is so long but the recap was a bitch! And I left a bunch of stuff out! Like we both said, they could not have proven my opinion about them and their behavior more thoroughly, more gloriously and more hilariously than they did in this thread. And I thank every last single one of them. 
Well that little exhibitition pretty much sealed the deal.
That was incredibly nasty. 
I mean, that what I hear on DU all the time.
DNC bad!!
So either ...
A) The DNC is evil, and so Bernie would be correct to not help them raise money,
OR ...
B) The DNC is NOT evil, and so Bernie should absolutely be helping them raise money.
Which is it??
DNC evil, or not evil?
In the Sig Line?
I really like that one!
Delete the space between "http://i.imgur.com/" and "e4E1Bdm.jpg" then paste it into your sig line
http://i.imgur.com/ e4E1Bdm.jpg
Some of us aren't afraid to post in GDP, where someone might disagree with us.
And did you hear him when he pointed out what other networks were showing? None were showing anything about Bernie. It's really outrageous. I DON'T believe their BULLSHIT. When he wins New Hampshire and hopefully Iowa, they will all HAVE to take notice.
And thank you, berni-mccoy, for posting this.
when I last donated they had this odd button I hadn't seen before. so when I donate $10 $5 goes to burner the other $5 goes to whomever is hosting the fundraiser. Naturally I didn't like that split so I tilted it $9 to $1 $9 to Bernie I wasn't being an ass and give them zero. thats Debbie's job 
the dnc has your info
all three dem campaigns can see that info all the time,no one had to steal or give anything away
what the data breach was about is a separate list that has supporter info beyond what all candidates campaigns can see
for example:
johnsmith
home addy
email addy
phone number
supports hc and a number range showing how strong that support is
more than likely hc just did a mail bomb of every dem/leaner that the dnc has collected over like 20 years
hope you can work things out with the bernie group,there has been so much animosity, feelings are easily to hurt and the net itself is difficult to communicate on so misunderstandings happen
From: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251975367
The whole thing is an interesting read.
Ahhh...... I'd like to buy a clue for $100.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/11/bernie-sanders-2016-fundraising-dnc-215559
It is Sanders that hasn't followed up.
Sure. That's me. The shitmeister.
The move, which comes more than two months after Hillary Clinton's campaign signed such an agreement in August, will allow Sanders' team to raise up to $33,400 for the committee as well as $2,700 for the campaign from individual donors at events.
The candidate rarely headlines fundraising events, and is not close with many big-money Democratic donors, but he has been working to prove his proximity to the party in recent months as he competes with Clinton.
The Vermont senator, who is an Independent but caucuses with Senate Democrats, also recently lent his name to a fundraising letter for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, according to a campaign adviser, in another indication of his slowly growing ties to the party's infrastructure.
Happens to the best of us!
so they probably aren't too concerned about what you're looking for.
I guess people will vote for whom they damn well please.
I hate it when the shit hits the fan!
Good thread, bernie!
