Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
Related: About this forumTexas activist Sarah Slamen: “It’s this police state that keeps us quiet” (interview)
You mention in the first few seconds of your speech that you had brought prepared remarks with you, but decided instead to speak off the cuff. What happened during the committee hearing to change your mind?
I wasnt prepared for the endless stream of people standing up to call women murderers and promiscuous, selfish killers. How is that in line with Senate decorum and appropriate testimony?
I think it was around 6 oclock [on Monday] that a woman stood up to talk about how her and her husband had spent most of their savings on in vitro fertilization treatments and that, after five or six tries, had finally gotten pregnant. But at 20 weeks, this couple found out that their baby had a rare form of spina bifida and would likely only have a 5 percent chance of survival. This woman recounted that, as soon as she learned she was pregnant, she had promised to love and protect her baby. And, in order to keep that promise, she had to have a medically necessary abortion.
After painfully recounting how she had to terminate this wanted pregnancy, a woman sitting next to her said, I know two people who have adopted children with spina bifida.
And not a word was said. Not one person on that committee of 20 had time to say, Lets not direct our comments to others providing testimony.
I wasnt prepared for the endless stream of people standing up to call women murderers and promiscuous, selfish killers. How is that in line with Senate decorum and appropriate testimony?
I think it was around 6 oclock [on Monday] that a woman stood up to talk about how her and her husband had spent most of their savings on in vitro fertilization treatments and that, after five or six tries, had finally gotten pregnant. But at 20 weeks, this couple found out that their baby had a rare form of spina bifida and would likely only have a 5 percent chance of survival. This woman recounted that, as soon as she learned she was pregnant, she had promised to love and protect her baby. And, in order to keep that promise, she had to have a medically necessary abortion.
After painfully recounting how she had to terminate this wanted pregnancy, a woman sitting next to her said, I know two people who have adopted children with spina bifida.
And not a word was said. Not one person on that committee of 20 had time to say, Lets not direct our comments to others providing testimony.
http://www.salon.com/2013/07/11/texas_activist_sarah_slamen_its_this_police_state_that_keeps_us_quiet/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1833 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Texas activist Sarah Slamen: “It’s this police state that keeps us quiet” (interview) (Original Post)
ismnotwasm
Jul 2013
OP
I was wondering when I'd see some threads on her. Her remarks were right on target.
Warren DeMontague
Jul 2013
#1
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)1. I was wondering when I'd see some threads on her. Her remarks were right on target.
I know DU's been clunky, maybe that's why there hasn't been more coverage.
ismnotwasm
(41,991 posts)2. Yes, she's pretty intuitive
Scary realist though
So I think that without massive civil disobedience the law will pass, and have some of the worst effects weve seen since before Roe.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)3. It will make it's way to the Supreme Court
and hopefully be overturned there. In the meantime, it will cause havoc in the lives of thousands of Texas women.