Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
Related: About this forum“Rebranding” feminism for dudes “who care that there are two genders”
Have you heard about this rebranding feminism contest?
I know, right? Again with the rebranding of feminism. Every so often there emerges from the fetid mists some chumpass jacknut who would take a crap on feminism by coopting it as a gimmick to help hawk thigh cream and tampons. The target? Women who sense deep down that regular feminism is a pretty good idea, but who are reluctant to admit it publicly because of the 2nd-wave taint that makes dudes hate feminists. All efforts to rebrand feminism involve making it more palatable to dudes. This is accomplished by repudiating feminisms rejection of femininity.
...
By Zooey Deschanel Mode I meant, of course, feminisms current brand: a consumer-driven collection of dude-appeasing lifestyle behaviors, the flagship cause of which is the empowerful modern girls inalienable right to choose feminine choices. No matter what choices are chosen, choice-choosing feminism insists that its practitioners abide in a critique-free zone, immune to the jaundiced scrutiny of the humorless, hairy womens studies cabal. Any less-than-enthusiastic analysis of the choice-choosing lifestyle is tantamount to misogyny, because theyre women, arent they? And theyre choosing choices, arent they? Isnt that supposed to be the whole point of feminism? Who the fuck are these feminist frumps to suggest that the choice to, say, project childlike vulnerability is neither a feminist objective nor a high moral purpose?
Quoth the adorkable Deschanel herself, on the subject of feminism vs. her disturbingly cutesy affect:
Her argument, in other words, is that shes a feminist; therefore it follows that anything she does however objectively antifeminist it may seem must be a feminist act. Including, apparently, the performance of femininity. So fuck you, gnarly feminists who dare to question whether collar shape should form the basis of a revolutionary platform!
With its huggy-wuggy embrace of patriarchy-approved behavior, this kind of feminism-as-fashion-accessory gets a lot of support from the unholy alliance of liberal dudes and the megatheocorporatocracy. Both are the direct beneficiaries of womens choiceiness. Both get appeased by and profit from women who choose choices from the menu provided by the Global Accords Governing Fair Use of Women. Dudes get girlfriends who willingly comply with the desired heteronorms, and corporations get loyal customers who reliably shell out for compliance apparatus.
...
http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2013/09/24/6418/
I know, right? Again with the rebranding of feminism. Every so often there emerges from the fetid mists some chumpass jacknut who would take a crap on feminism by coopting it as a gimmick to help hawk thigh cream and tampons. The target? Women who sense deep down that regular feminism is a pretty good idea, but who are reluctant to admit it publicly because of the 2nd-wave taint that makes dudes hate feminists. All efforts to rebrand feminism involve making it more palatable to dudes. This is accomplished by repudiating feminisms rejection of femininity.
...
By Zooey Deschanel Mode I meant, of course, feminisms current brand: a consumer-driven collection of dude-appeasing lifestyle behaviors, the flagship cause of which is the empowerful modern girls inalienable right to choose feminine choices. No matter what choices are chosen, choice-choosing feminism insists that its practitioners abide in a critique-free zone, immune to the jaundiced scrutiny of the humorless, hairy womens studies cabal. Any less-than-enthusiastic analysis of the choice-choosing lifestyle is tantamount to misogyny, because theyre women, arent they? And theyre choosing choices, arent they? Isnt that supposed to be the whole point of feminism? Who the fuck are these feminist frumps to suggest that the choice to, say, project childlike vulnerability is neither a feminist objective nor a high moral purpose?
Quoth the adorkable Deschanel herself, on the subject of feminism vs. her disturbingly cutesy affect:
Im just being myself, says Deschanel, 33. There is not an ounce of me that believes any of that crap (feminists) say. We cant be feminine and be feminists and be successful? I want to be a fucking feminist and wear a fucking Peter Pan collar. So what?
Her argument, in other words, is that shes a feminist; therefore it follows that anything she does however objectively antifeminist it may seem must be a feminist act. Including, apparently, the performance of femininity. So fuck you, gnarly feminists who dare to question whether collar shape should form the basis of a revolutionary platform!
With its huggy-wuggy embrace of patriarchy-approved behavior, this kind of feminism-as-fashion-accessory gets a lot of support from the unholy alliance of liberal dudes and the megatheocorporatocracy. Both are the direct beneficiaries of womens choiceiness. Both get appeased by and profit from women who choose choices from the menu provided by the Global Accords Governing Fair Use of Women. Dudes get girlfriends who willingly comply with the desired heteronorms, and corporations get loyal customers who reliably shell out for compliance apparatus.
...
http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2013/09/24/6418/
She's back!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1370 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
“Rebranding” feminism for dudes “who care that there are two genders” (Original Post)
redqueen
Oct 2013
OP
i fuckin love it. and that is not even going in to read the whole fuckin thing.
seabeyond
Oct 2013
#1
ya know. the very people (men) she is talking about are the very men that tell us women we are NOT
seabeyond
Oct 2013
#3
Anyone critical of objectification, porn and prostitution is a baaaad, baaaaaaaad feminist!
redqueen
Oct 2013
#4
and peter pan collars, lol. ah ha. i am off to play. candles going, music up.... nt
seabeyond
Oct 2013
#5
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)1. i fuckin love it. and that is not even going in to read the whole fuckin thing.
LUV it.
lol
Nobody breaks it down quite like Twisty.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)3. ya know. the very people (men) she is talking about are the very men that tell us women we are NOT
allowed to listen to this woman cause that makes us hairy ugly jealous frigid women. dontcha know.
isnt that the biggest fuckin hoot ever
i swear life alone busts me up.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)4. Anyone critical of objectification, porn and prostitution is a baaaad, baaaaaaaad feminist!
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)5. and peter pan collars, lol. ah ha. i am off to play. candles going, music up.... nt
MadrasT
(7,237 posts)6. There are no amount of words to describe my love for this.
ismnotwasm
(41,980 posts)7. OMG
I've been reading about this shit---brought to you by UK "Elle" magazine-- such a feminist mag right?
Then twisty, as usual nails it
For those who may be just joining us, allow me to reiterate that femininity is not, as women are pressured to believe, an inherited trait. It is a set of infantilizing and dude-appeasing behaviors that women are required to perform in order to designate us as members of the sex class, signal our sexual availability, and convey our degree of compliance with the patriarchal mandate.
Even I have to use this smilie for IBTP