Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
Sun Jun 10, 2012, 12:19 PM Jun 2012

Why Should a Woman Be More Like a Man to Succeed?

We know women can be successful in their own right, but for some reason the idea that to succeed, women have to act more like men still survives despite solid facts to the contrary. Your brain, your intelligence and your talents are what matter, not your gender. Why should we have to prove that? Unfortunately we sometimes do; drive and getting ahead seem to be eternally equated with high levels of testosterone. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was insulted four years ago by a comment saying the nation needed a leader with, "Testicular fortitude." Seriously?

Women are doing just fine without testicular fortitude; We have our own unique brand of fortitude and it is working. According to the Survey of Earned Doctorates, 2011 was the tenth year in a row in which the majority of research doctorates awarded to U.S. citizens went to women. Women now earn 57 percent of bachelor degrees and 59 percent of masters degrees. More doctorates are awarded to women than men in the humanities, social sciences, education, and life sciences and medicine. Women now serve as presidents of Harvard, MIT, Princeton, the University of Pennsylvania and other leading research universities. Their position in the corporate world has increased exponentially as well.

*

Yet even in 2012, women hoping to succeed in business are cautioned to "act like a man." No one has really explained what "acting like a man" means. If it means being aggressive in a take-no-prisoners push for success, then I have to say that this is not gender-specific. I know women as well as men who have that ability. I have seen women be just as tough as men when it comes to budgets, corporate takeovers, business dealings, military expertise, medical practices and complex financial matters. When it comes to succeeding in a chosen field, women excel. The only difference is that, besides being strong and decisive, women use positions of authority to create a supportive environment for all workers, something that can be sorely missing in male-only dominated positions of power.

But being nurturing and supportive of your coworkers is actually a good attribute for leadership. Dr. John C. Maxwell, a leadership expert, says that the qualities of a charismatic leader combines love of life, valuing the potential in other people, giving hope in troubling situations and sharing their talents and their success in a positive way that benefits all. These are seen as "female qualities" but according to Dr. Maxwell, successful male leaders like Bill Gates and Steve Jobs incorporate these qualities as well. So if men and women seem to be pretty equal in many ways as far as intelligence, strength of convictions and the instinct to get ahead goes, is there one necessary thing women can learn from men? Yes, and it involves valuing your own talents to the point of making sure you get the salary and benefits you deserve.

http://thealternativepress.com/articles/why-should-a-woman-be-more-like-a-man-to-succeed

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

longship

(40,416 posts)
1. Good read
Sun Jun 10, 2012, 12:43 PM
Jun 2012

Thanks for the post.

I've known for some time that women are kicking men's asses in high school, undergraduate, and in biology/medicine. But it's nice to know that it's also true in general for grad degrees.

I am not surprised by this because we all know that women will eventually take over the world.

I am a guy who thinks that that would be a good idea (as long as it doesn't include Phyllis Schlafly or Michelle Bachmann or their ilk).

MadrasT

(7,237 posts)
2. I have to take exception to this sentence:
Sun Jun 10, 2012, 12:46 PM
Jun 2012
The only difference is that, besides being strong and decisive, women use positions of authority to create a supportive environment for all workers, something that can be sorely missing in male-only dominated positions of power.


"Creating a supportive environment for all workers" is not a woman thing. It is another f*cking gender stereotype.

She tries try to write a pro-woman article saying that business/political success is not gender dependent... and then she mucks it up with Yet Another Gender Stereotype.

You can't have it both ways... and that is what she is trying to do here.
 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
3. agreed. my father made it to the top of his corp and my hubby built his own company
Sun Jun 10, 2012, 12:53 PM
Jun 2012

both are a lot alike in how they run business. both successful. and both had the goal what this article suggests is women. agreed. different managing style that is not gender based.

i have been lucky to work in business that adopted this type style management and not the cut throat that they talk about. and i have had all men bosses.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
6. why would you say that? it isnt true. i see no reason to diss, for the sake of dissing
Sun Jun 10, 2012, 02:05 PM
Jun 2012

i think there is a post right above yours, replying to madrast in agreement.

so, why?

Little Star

(17,055 posts)
10. "women use positions of authority to create a supportive environment for all workers"...
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 09:52 AM
Jun 2012

Not any more than men do, in my experience at least!

Your right, just another gender stereotype.

ismnotwasm

(41,986 posts)
8. Considering
Sun Jun 10, 2012, 05:43 PM
Jun 2012

That men run things, some things well, more things like caca, I have no idea.
Love the article

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»Why Should a Woman Be Mor...