Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ismnotwasm

(41,989 posts)
Thu Aug 28, 2014, 11:36 PM Aug 2014

WILL THE INTERNET EVER BE SAFE FOR WOMEN?

The editors of the feminist blog Jezebel had to publicly call out their employers at Gawker Media for refusing to permanently ban commenters who spammed the site with animated images of rape and sexual assault. The popular web forum Fark.com felt it necessary to add “misogyny” to the moderator guidelines in order to combat the presence of rape jokes, as well as slut-shaming and victim-blaming language. Robin Williams’ daughter Zelda was forced to leave Twitter after receiving waves of harassment following the death of her father. And while Twitter has promised to reevaluate its policies in the aftermath of Zelda Williams’ departure, many female Twitter users, as Slate reports, still have to rely on third-party blocking tools like the Block Bot, Block Together, or Flaminga, in order to clear their Twitter feeds of harassment and abuse.


After a month like this one, it’s worth asking: Will the Internet ever be a safe place for women? This question might seem naïve. If you are a woman with an online presence, after all, you may have grown so accustomed to Internet harassment that you cannot even imagine an alternate future. A recent poll from the Rad Campaign, Lincoln Park Strategies, and Craiglist founder Craig Newmark found that 57 percent of people who experience abuse online are women.

While this data might lead one to believe that women are only marginally more affected by Internet harassment than men, Amanda Hess at Pacific Standard puts a more qualitative face on this quantitative data. Nearly three-quarters of people who report harassment to the organization Working to Halt Online Abuse, she notes, are women. Internet “accounts with feminine usernames” also receive “100 sexually explicit or threatening messages a day” compared to less than four per day for accounts with masculine usernames. Hess concludes, “the vilest [online] communications are still disproportionately lobbed at women.” For women on the Internet, vitriolic abuse is simply a fact of life.

We are accustomed to thinking that the prevalence of sexist Internet harassment is a problem with people rather than a problem with technology. Accordingly, most efforts to make the Internet a more hospitable place for women are reactive approaches that seek to address problems after they take place, rather than proactive approaches that seek to prevent harassment at its technological roots. The only way the editors of Jezebel could try to stop their “rape gif problem,” for example, was to “individually” and “manually” delete comments and ban commenters. Even then, commenters could continue making new accounts and posting more explicit images. Gawker Media has since stepped in with a back-end fix that hides comments from new users until Jezebel or another approved commenter has approved them.


http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/08/28/will-the-internet-ever-be-safe-for-women.html
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WILL THE INTERNET EVER BE SAFE FOR WOMEN? (Original Post) ismnotwasm Aug 2014 OP
If so, certainly not before the offline world is Scootaloo Aug 2014 #1
Heh! ismnotwasm Aug 2014 #3
Nope. Freedom of Screech will make sure it doesn't. freshwest Aug 2014 #2
Well, I'm can be really quite obnoxious in RL ismnotwasm Aug 2014 #4
here is a bc 4 minute video that makes it clear. of course the man blames leftie liberals seabeyond Aug 2014 #5
 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
1. If so, certainly not before the offline world is
Fri Aug 29, 2014, 12:26 AM
Aug 2014

After all, remember John Gabriel's Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory:

ismnotwasm

(41,989 posts)
4. Well, I'm can be really quite obnoxious in RL
Fri Aug 29, 2014, 09:11 AM
Aug 2014

I have very thick skin. As far as verbal safety- it goes goes more than one way, and I'd win. If I said what I wanted to say here, I'd have many more hides that the more vocal members.

But that's not the issue. Who wants to act like that? The answer, As we see, are more than a few momma's basement dwellers all the way up to "I've been married to a great woman for x amount of years". Which is, essentially hiding behind the claimed relationship to maintain some bullshit point.

So yeah, as long as one can cheerlead oneself-- or with like minded buddies--in anonymity it will never be safe, unless the culture changes and rape and dismemberment threats somehow become uncool.

That they're considered a great way to express displeasure with a point of view of women well, rape culture, misogyny and privilege are clearly in ascendent

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
5. here is a bc 4 minute video that makes it clear. of course the man blames leftie liberals
Fri Aug 29, 2014, 09:57 AM
Aug 2014

not wanting ideas challenged. so calling women names, threatening them with rape, is merely an argument to ideas. moran.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017211989

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»WILL THE INTERNET EVER BE...