Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,659 posts)
Wed May 1, 2013, 07:58 PM May 2013

"Pat Toomey: Background Checks Died Because GOP Didn't Want To Help Obama"

Pat Toomey: Background Checks Died Because GOP Didn't Want To Help Obama

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/01/pat-toomey-background-checks_n_3192690.html?ref=topbar

"SNIP............................


Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) revealed that some members of his party opposed expanding background checks for gun sales recently because they didn't want to "be seen helping the president."

Two weeks ago, only three Republican senators voted for the bipartisan background checks amendment sponsored by Toomey and Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), despite overwhelming popular support for such a measure.

"In the end it didn’t pass because we're so politicized. There were some on my side who did not want to be seen helping the president do something he wanted to get done, just because the president wanted to do it,” Toomey admitted on Tuesday in an interview with Digital First Media editors in the offices of the Times Herald newspaper in Norristown, Pa.

The Times Herald noted that in "subsequent comments," Toomey "tried to walk that remark part-way back by noting he meant to say Republicans across the nation in general, not just those in the Senate."


...........................SNIP"
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Pat Toomey: Background Checks Died Because GOP Didn't Want To Help Obama" (Original Post) applegrove May 2013 OP
Thanks brucefan May 2013 #1
The fact that Republicans are openly admitting obstruction is new I think. applegrove May 2013 #2
No shit. n/t ellisonz May 2013 #3
At the expense of the people they were elected to serve. Robb May 2013 #4

Robb

(39,665 posts)
4. At the expense of the people they were elected to serve.
Thu May 2, 2013, 01:04 PM
May 2013

Congresscritters are so goddamned silo-ed, they don't consider the responsibility they have to the nation.

They swear an oath to the US Constitution -- not to the loudest knuckledragger in the hall outside their office, nor to the biggest pockets in their state.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»"Pat Toomey: Background C...