Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumOK Huma Abedin will sink Hillary's campaign
Why? You know why. That's all I'm going to say at this stage.
jillan
(39,451 posts)Classified emails soon?
yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)Beaverhausen
(24,470 posts)Please elaborate.
Merryland
(1,134 posts)in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)I guess I'm not following the server thing as closely as I should. OR the Cash to the Clinton Foundation for favors investigations?
PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)I hope Rosa is right.
PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE
HoosierRadical
(390 posts)to bring all that stuff out, by than it will be too late and the party will go down in flames.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)The State Dept is investigating Clinton and the Foundation to see if there was ethics violations. AFAIK there's no Republican connection.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)Who would like to see Clinton go down.
The NYT reported that hardly anyone at State knew that Clinton had a private server.
I bet that pissed off a lot of important people.
jfern
(5,204 posts)The Obama administration State Dept. is investigating her
The Obama administration FBI is investigating her
A Clinton appointee judge ruled that her aides have to testify.
It's all a right-wing conspiracy!!!!!
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)i think he's a character in one of my son's tv programs or something
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)That's why I clicked!
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)but that summer with jon oliver was awesome!
merrily
(45,251 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)Rebkeh
(2,450 posts)Literally lolling here. Good one
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)if the shit hits the fan about emails or Clinton Foundation donations?
malletgirl02
(1,523 posts)I think the first minion to be thrown to the wolves will th the IT guy who set up the server for Clinton.
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Original post)
Post removed
jeff47
(26,549 posts)The right-wing fundies would be in a tizzy, but they'd never vote for a Democrat anyway.
yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Beaverhausen
(24,470 posts)That post mentioned a possible romantic relationship between Hillary and Huma. That is something the right wing has been whispering about for years.
Do you really want to go there?
merrily
(45,251 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)I think the Foundations dealings overlapping with Hillary's term with State Department have concerned some insiders who worry about the Dem Party's integrity going forward. Add in the Republicans, who have their own objectives, and there may be pressure enough to expose the overlaps of Foundation and Hillary's contacts in State and outside with foreign governments.
But..."Concern" doesn't necessarily mean action when Trump as an alternative hangs over the national election for Democrats.
I've also wondered if the PTB are putting a lid on any Clinton revelations until the end of March Primaries to see if Bernie can hold up and go on to the final election with some strength. If he can't, then Dems/Obama Admin. will be pressured to not reveal anything and it will be left up to the Repubs/Trump, if he prevails, to go after Clinton Foundation dealings. If Trump manages to implode (doesn't seem likely, at this point) then who knows what could happen.
agracie
(950 posts)...not sure what I'm allowed to say.
sarge43
(28,942 posts)We don't have melt downs about honest criticism, if that's what concerns you.
Welcome and feel the Bern.
It's like the heathers. Eventually, they take out their own.
agracie
(950 posts)sarge43
(28,942 posts)Was it a jury hit?
agracie
(950 posts)sarge43
(28,942 posts)In a protected group like this or theirs, shouldn't happen.
In short, check the forum/group first before posting. Here: Safe. General discussion or GD-P: All bets are off. Camp Weathervane: Unless you bow to She Who Must Be Obeyed, they won't bother to alert, you'll be blocked. Then, you can come back here and get your badge of honor.
agracie
(950 posts)sarge43
(28,942 posts)So perhaps it was one of those "take a deep breath before hitting Post" messages. The one we've all written, posted then wished we hadn't.
A jury hidden message can be read. So maybe reading it might clarify.
agracie
(950 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)agracie
(950 posts)MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)about her in January. It might be available online.
bernbabe
(370 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)Go somewhere else with that right-wing shit!
bernbabe
(370 posts)are valid sources. Did you read it? Do you expect a liberal source to talk about it?
arcane1
(38,613 posts)I had never even heard of "breitbart" before reading that. I also have no idea if there is any "there" there.
Bad Bad JuJu
(22 posts)The ship U.S.S. Clinton is afloat in a sea of turds. Something, or someone, will sink it, sooner or later. The sooner the better for us all.
wilsonbooks
(972 posts)when they met Jan. 27th.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)My guess is it was about that, mostly.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Bernie got that right after.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)I suspect it may have touched on multiple things, including assurances by Obama that no endorsement was made despite comments by his not so long former press sec.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)The meeting was two days before the Iowa Caucus. Sanders was pulled off the campaign trail.
The line was that this was a foreign-policy discussion. Maybe. Seems odd that Sanders, a Dem primary candidate, would schedule a meeting in DC two days before a primary contest.
Interest that they didn't just schedule a call. Their meeting was very public, involving the media.
Perhaps their meeting was a signal to someone?
Of course, I have no idea. It's interesting to think out loud because there is some mystery surrounding that meeting.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)Wasn't she the contact person for Hillary and donors to the Clinton Foundation. She probably knows things, some of which might (and I emphasize might) be harmful to Clinton.
I'm not sure what her motivation would be to "sink" Hillary's campaign. Is the FBI grilling her?
bernbabe
(370 posts)"right hand woman". Unless the relationship soured for some reason, and there has been no news of that, then she would not voluntarily say anything to hurt Hillary.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)I've always sort of thought she was a real asset. Would make a great SOS with more experience.
My only concern about her is if Trump is the candidate he will make a big deal about her being a Muslim, her family being way more into Islam than the average muslim, and their ties to other Muslim orgainizations.
That he will sort of cast her as the ears of Isis being right next to the president, and try to make that stick.
Also as the VF article mentioned the Clinton organization sort of went out on a limb to make sure she was living in comfort after her husband lost his income which sort of puts a slight taint of the whole Clinton organization on an otherwise pretty clean person.
By far the most dangerous thing in the current climate I think is the fact that she's a Muslim from a very Muslim family, who will be very close to the president, and then when you read the emails it's almost like Hillary totally depends on her, and everything has to go thru her Muslim aide to get to her.
Which I don't care about. I'd probably vote for Aberdin over Clinton but I can see the Trump people making incredible hay with her.
radical noodle
(8,012 posts)"But with a powerful Republican senator raising questions about her role in the Clinton-era State Department, Abedin finds herself the latest victim of the Stop Hillary movement."
I have to wonder what the point of this is. I also recall some Republicans making all sorts of accusations about Huma some time ago... like since she has a funny name she is suspect.
It sounds like another Republican hit job, but that's what seems to make everyone happy here these days.
merrily
(45,251 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)The disturbing question is when.
The republicans of course are sitting on a mountain of incriminating stuff, much of which is already available in the public record, but our liberal media is too lazy (or intimidated) to dig it out.
It is not to their advantage to scuttle Clinton's campaign right now, but rather to wait until the Democratic party is so committed to her that her destruction would virtually end all chance of the WH remaining in Democratic hands.
There are probably a lot of republican pundits, consultants, and other assorted hangers on who are all but peeing their pants at the prospect of dropping all this stuff on her, but they are being held in check (by somebody) until its too late to switch to Bernie or even some other Plan B.
They need to be put in a position of dropping the various bombshells now, so there is still time for the Democrats to change direction.
antigop
(12,778 posts)Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement or how much income she earned on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income.
yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)We need to hear the whole story
antigop
(12,778 posts)Maybe we can all gather for drinks/dinner and HRC can come join for as long as she can? Abedin wrote.
The December 2012 event showcased the unique position that Abedin occupied at the apex of the Clintons public and private worlds during the final six months of Hillary Clintons tenure heading the State Department.
At the time, Abedin held four jobs with four different employers an arrangement allowed by a special government designation she held permitting outside employment. And each job had a connection to the Dublin dinner.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)Hillary Clinton needed hand-holding with her daily schedule and was 'often confused' while she was secretary of state, her former top aide and 'body woman' Huma Adebin wrote a colleague in a January 2013 email.
The message, to coworker Monica Hanley, followed a back-and-forth about Clinton's schedule of calls with foreign leaders, including an 8:00 a.m. appointment to speak with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.
'Have you been going over calls with her for tomorrow? So she knows singh [sic] ls at 8?' Abedin asked Hanley just before 5:00 p.m. on a Saturday.
'She was in bed for a nap by the time I heard that she had an 8am call,' Hanley replied three minutes later. 'Will go over with her.'
'Very imp[ortant] to do that. She's often confused,' Abedin told her.
fter the deadly terror attacks in Benghazi, Libya.
Clinton missed a meeting at the White House for President Obama's daily national security briefing because she overslept.
Hanley emailed Clinton at 9:17 that morning to let her know that White House Senior Adviser Dan Pfeiffer' had 'some sensitive items that he would like to personally show you when he arrives.'
Clinton didn't reply until 10:43, hearly an hour and a half later.
'[J]ust woke up,' she told Hanley, 'so i [sic] missed Dan. Could he come back after I finish my calls?'
Read more: and there is more
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3320900/Newly-released-email-shows-aide-Huma-Abedin-warned-colleagues-Hillary-confused-needed-hand-holding-calls-foreign-leaders.html#ixzz41YMt1e6c