Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lorien

(31,935 posts)
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 10:52 PM Mar 2016

Wil Wheaton: I’m feeling the Bern, in part because I just don’t believe Secretary Clinton.

Last edited Fri Mar 4, 2016, 10:43 PM - Edit history (1)

(snip)

And I saw an article yesterday that summed up my fundamental problem with Hillary Clinton. Paraphrasing, the thesis was that she lacks political courage, and won’t take a stand on something unless is politically safe for her. From marriage equality to the war in Iraq to ensuring that the poorest Americans have opportunities to have a better life, she has never supported a law or policy that was politically risky or would threaten her chances to advance her political career. Bernie Sanders, on the other hand, has taken principled and politically risky stances, not because they would advance his career, but because that’s what he believed in. As it turns out, his values and my values match up very well, and that’s why I can enthusiastically and passionately support him:

Hillary’s Iraq Vote Lacked Courage, Not Judgment

The decision to go to war in Iraq was a major failure of judgment by the Bush administration and the people who implemented the war. But the Democrats in the House and Senate who had to choose how to vote were not really facing a test of judgment. They were facing a test of political courage. And pretty much every single one of them who had presidential ambitions failed it miserably, including Senator Hillary Clinton.

(snip)

More: http://wilwheaton.net/2016/01/im-feeling-the-bern-in-part-because-i-just-dont-believe-secretary-clinton/

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wil Wheaton: I’m feeling the Bern, in part because I just don’t believe Secretary Clinton. (Original Post) Lorien Mar 2016 OP
Kick. nt Ilsa Mar 2016 #1
It's been reported zentrum Mar 2016 #2
yep Cassiopeia Mar 2016 #7
It was a calculated move Hydra Mar 2016 #8
HILLARY CLINTON KNEW IRAQ DID NOT HAVE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION. Raster Mar 2016 #13
that's exactly right stupidicus Mar 2016 #16
Damn Right. zentrum Mar 2016 #17
FWIW, she was a senator from NY TexasBushwhacker Mar 2016 #18
That's where COURAGE of conviction comes in. Imagine if Hillary had said... Raster Mar 2016 #21
Sorry, but I don't think Hillary is all that brilliant. JDPriestly Mar 2016 #25
Not sure their constituency would have accepted a no vote? Why not, I knew there were no A Simple Game Mar 2016 #22
And *that's where character and convictions come into it. silvershadow Mar 2016 #24
Speaking of selfish people on thing about the next election... Raster Mar 2016 #30
She had to carpet-bag: There's no way she could go back to Arkansas and win. silvershadow Mar 2016 #31
You are so correct. Back to Arkansas would mean Hilary being just another housewife... Raster Mar 2016 #33
I think the separation between the Clintons and Arkansas was by mutual agreement. A Simple Game Mar 2016 #35
Schumer is a super-NeoCon, with zentrum Mar 2016 #29
And her fans love her for it. They like her toughness. Sadly the 99% suffer from that "toughness", rhett o rick Mar 2016 #23
some people only feel alive when others suffer. She also is a great roguevalley Mar 2016 #3
That's a real good endorsement! He's got quite the following! Bubzer Mar 2016 #4
WHEAAATOOOOON!!!!!! basselope Mar 2016 #5
... progressoid Mar 2016 #6
Wheaton is pretty sharp Babel_17 Mar 2016 #9
He's currently in Dark Matter Paulie Mar 2016 #32
Cool, I have Netflix so I'll check it out Babel_17 Mar 2016 #36
It's a great show. Paulie Mar 2016 #37
It's spelled "Wil", FYI PeaceNikki Mar 2016 #10
Thank you Wil! SoapBox Mar 2016 #11
K&R kristopher Mar 2016 #12
Kicked and recommended to the Max! Enthusiast Mar 2016 #14
Kicked and recommended. nt Duval Mar 2016 #15
K & R! TIME TO PANIC Mar 2016 #19
Great, +1 re disbelief, but lack of courage is IMHO too kind dreamnightwind Mar 2016 #20
K&R!! He always struck me as a bright kid!! haikugal Mar 2016 #26
43 years old now. Time does fly! nt Lorien Mar 2016 #27
Yeah...you had to remind me...he and my son are about the same age. haikugal Mar 2016 #28
Me too, Will me b zola Mar 2016 #34

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
2. It's been reported
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 12:26 AM
Mar 2016

….that HRC was so indifferent to what her decision to go into Iraq would really mean for Iraq, American soldiers, and the unanticipated results we see tragically every day—that she would not even read the complete Presidential briefing that Congress was given. Had she read the entire report, she would have seen how unlikely it was that Saddam had WMD.

Apparently the senators that read the entire thing—did not support the war. But she didn't care. She saw only how it would advance she herself in readiness for the election of 08.

How could you not lose sleep and study every bit of information you could over a war vote? How?

In fact, she made a speech that went even a step further than Bush—directly linking Saddam to Al Qaida —which was absolutely untrue. She was hot for war.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
8. It was a calculated move
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 02:45 AM
Mar 2016

And we see the quid pro quo today. The Clintons have been adopted into the 1% and into the Bush Family.

I'm sure it's because the Bush family is so generous, and has nothing to do with previous and future support.

Raster

(20,998 posts)
13. HILLARY CLINTON KNEW IRAQ DID NOT HAVE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION.
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 06:42 PM
Mar 2016

She didn't need to study. She did not need a briefing.

SHE ALREADY KNEW: (1) That Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction; (2) Iraq had NO CONNECTION TO AL QAIDA; and (3) Iraq had NOTHING TO DO WITH 9/11.

How did she know: Hillary Clinton has been essentially running for POTUS since at least the early 1990's. She has been the most hand's on and involved First Lady this country has ever seen. She was privy to just about everything Bill was privy to, including the in-depth CIA briefings that ex-POTUS are entitled to, and I GUARANTEE YOU, she made sure Bill got those briefings so she would have access to all that information.

NO, Hillary Clinton's vote to illegally invade Iraq and involve this country into Bush*'s Middle East folly was a calculated effort to yield the best political return for Hillary Clinton...NOT THE UNITED STATES, but for Hillary Clinton.

 

stupidicus

(2,570 posts)
16. that's exactly right
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 06:51 PM
Mar 2016

That's why I've long thought and argued that she's a tad different than the others that voted for it, and that Bush wouldn't have sold his lies so easily to those that bought them if not for all the BS coming from Clinton before him

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
17. Damn Right.
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 07:34 PM
Mar 2016

Made no difference—she already knew.

Wish Bernie would take off the gloves and really spell out more vividly how her vote and advocacy of this war has hurt the country. Not just soldiers and families of soldiers, but the entire economy for all of us who aren't war profiteers. He needs to paint the picture really clearly —it's connection to why we can't "afford" national healthcare, free public education, infrastructure jobs.

Be sure to see Michael Moore's "Where To Invade Next". People walk up the aisles staggering, afterwards.



TexasBushwhacker

(20,191 posts)
18. FWIW, she was a senator from NY
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 07:47 PM
Mar 2016

Chuck Schumer voted for it as well. I'm not sure their constituency would have accepted a No vote.

I voted for Bernie in the primary.

Raster

(20,998 posts)
21. That's where COURAGE of conviction comes in. Imagine if Hillary had said...
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 08:42 PM
Mar 2016

..."from everything I have seen, this is not what we should be doing."

She probably would have been elected in 2008. Instead, she, like so many others, followed Cheney*, Bush* and the NeoCon circus into madness.

HOWEVER, THERE ARE MAJOR DIFFERENCES between Hillary and the rest of the crowd: (1) Hillary is a Brilliant woman, with a superb head on her shoulders, and had access to restricted data that few persons had. She was an ultimate insider... I do not believe for one minute that Hillary thought that Iraq had WMD. NOT FOR ONE FUCKING MINUTE. She knowingly and willingly chose to vote for the Iraq War because of political gain. She was willing to sentence innocent men, women and children to death because she thought it would look good on her resume.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
25. Sorry, but I don't think Hillary is all that brilliant.
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 10:05 PM
Mar 2016

She has been wrong on so many things, even simple things like gay marriage.

She got good grades in school. She may even have received top grades in law school. Those accomplishments do not mean that she is brilliant. Not at all. They mean she was a good student.

Bill Gates is brilliant.

Einstein was brilliant.

Werner von Braun was brilliant.

Ghandi was brilliant.

The list of brilliant people is very long.

Hillary isn't on it, not by a long shot.

What has she done or said that demonstrated that she was any more intelligent than any other political hack?

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
22. Not sure their constituency would have accepted a no vote? Why not, I knew there were no
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 09:21 PM
Mar 2016

WMD's in Iraq as did most of my fellow New Yorkers, much of this Country, and most of the world.

Unless by their constituency you mean Israel which is Schumer's true constituency.

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
24. And *that's where character and convictions come into it.
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 09:55 PM
Mar 2016

I knew what the game was, sitting in my recliner watching it on tv. She had to have known. Bernie did. And we saw him on the tv in Congress, telling us almost daily what was going on and why he was voting the way he was.

The correct thing is to vote every single time the correct way, regardless of whether or not it would get you thrown out of office. A person who only thinks about the next election is a rather selfish person to me.

Raster

(20,998 posts)
30. Speaking of selfish people on thing about the next election...
Sat Mar 5, 2016, 12:04 AM
Mar 2016

...why do you think Hillary ran for a cushy Senate seat from New York? Was it to benefit the citizens of The Empire State? Oh hell no! It was just another election stop in her quest to be the first female POTUS.

EVERYTHING HILLARY CLINTON DOES IS CALCULATED TO ACHIEVE THE BEST RESULT THAT BENEFITS HILLARY CLINTON!

There is no altruism, there is no "public service." There is only self-aggrandizing and the quest for power.

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
31. She had to carpet-bag: There's no way she could go back to Arkansas and win.
Sat Mar 5, 2016, 12:17 AM
Mar 2016

They were done with them by then, at least enough she'd never have won. nt

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
35. I think the separation between the Clintons and Arkansas was by mutual agreement.
Sat Mar 5, 2016, 10:29 AM
Mar 2016

As a lifetime New York resident I have always called Hillary a carpetbagger. If you can't be truthful about your politicians you get the politicians you deserve. If Hillary somehow makes it to the Presidency many of her supporters will find that out the hard way. Sadly they will take those of us that realize the truth about Hillary along with them.

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
29. Schumer is a super-NeoCon, with
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 11:31 PM
Mar 2016

….. huge Wall Street backing but there are and were tremendous liberal forces in NY too. I live there and the demonstrations in the street were huge, on-going and never reported.

But, that's her "political calculation"—she wanted to be on the 9/11 jingo bandwagon and the number of dead and maimed be damned. There is a strong case she could have made with the bully pulpit of a Senator about all the evidence there was against invading and been just fine. Even the Senatorship was just a stepping stone for her in her resume as she marched back to the WH.

Thanks so much for your primary vote. Can't wait to cast mine.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
23. And her fans love her for it. They like her toughness. Sadly the 99% suffer from that "toughness",
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 09:48 PM
Mar 2016

but her fans don't care. They won't even discuss how she will turn things around. They simply don't care. It's all about worshiping the American Aristocracy.

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
3. some people only feel alive when others suffer. She also is a great
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 12:30 AM
Mar 2016

friend of Kissinger and vacays with him so no one should be surprised that this is stuff that Kissinger practiced for decades. I love will wheaton and always have.

Babel_17

(5,400 posts)
9. Wheaton is pretty sharp
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 01:47 PM
Mar 2016

I used to read his recaps of ST:TNG episodes, and they were funny and insightful. He had a clever role in The Guild, the web series starring Felicia Day, and his wit and intelligence showed throughout. Basically the same character he plays in The Big Bang Theory (himself) lol.

http://wilwheaton.typepad.com/wwdnbackup/2006/12/the_2006_best_o.html

http://wilwheaton.typepad.com/wwdnbackup/2007/01/encounter_at_fa.html

The recaps are mostly gone from internet, but I see now that he compiled them.

http://www.amazon.com/Memories-Future-Vol-Wil-Wheaton/dp/0974116041

Amazon lets you preview the Kindle version.



Paulie

(8,462 posts)
37. It's a great show.
Sat Mar 5, 2016, 11:39 AM
Mar 2016

Though probably won't be able to see the next season until this time next year since we only stream in our house.

dreamnightwind

(4,775 posts)
20. Great, +1 re disbelief, but lack of courage is IMHO too kind
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 08:05 PM
Mar 2016

I think she's quite courageous, never bought the weathervane meme either. It's just an appearance of lack of courage or a weatthervane, because what she has to present to the people to get their votes is not what she truly represents, which is global corporatism.

The global corporations were onboard and fully behind the war on Iraq, it was no accident and the people supporting it were not deceived by Bush.

More of the same if she is elected. See Libya and Syria for previews of what we can look forward to, and the people in latin america aren't safe either.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Wil Wheaton: I’m feeling ...