Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumHow Hillary bought state Democratic Party structures, Margot Kidder
We Sanders supporters need to keep the facts in this article in mind as we campaign for Bernie:
Collusion between the Clinton campaign and the DNC allowed Hillary Clinton to buy the loyalty of 33 state Democratic parties last summer. Montana was one of those states. It sold itself for $64,100.
. . . .
The idea was to increase how much one could personally donate to Hillary by taking advantage of the Supreme Court ruling 2014, McCutcheon v FEC, that knocked down a cap on aggregate limits as to how much a donor could give to a federal campaign in a year. It thus eliminated the ceiling on amounts spent by a single donor to a presidential candidate.
In other words, a single donor, by giving 10,000 dollars a year to each signatory state could legally give an extra $330,000 a year for two years to the Hillary Victory Fund. For each donor, this raised their individual legal cap on the Presidential campaign to $660,000 if given in both 2015 and 2016. And to one million, three hundred and 20 thousand dollars if an equal amount were also donated in their spouses name.
. . . .
What do billionaires like Esprit Founder Susie Buell of California, and Sri Lankan lobbyist Imaad Zuberi of California, and media mogul Fred Eychaner of Chicago, and Donald Sussman hedgefund manager from New York and Chicago real estate mogul J.B Pritzker, and gay activist Jon Stryker of NY, and NRA and Viacom lobbyist Jeffrey Forbes and entertainment mogul Haim Saban all have in common?
(Find out here
http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/04/01/how-hillary-clinton-bought-the-loyalty-of-33-state-democratic-parties/
djean111
(14,255 posts)and bypassing the state parties and the DNC -
Not a penny from me. Ever. And I won't vote for that kind of thinking to be president of the United States.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)casino
840high
(17,196 posts)azmom
(5,208 posts)That they are gaining? I'm confused. Is it just a promise that they will eventually get some of that?
LiberalArkie
(15,722 posts)The local party was just a collection point for the national party.
Response to JDPriestly (Original post)
Califonz This message was self-deleted by its author.