Well I guess I hit a boundary

[SHRED]

Or a nerve.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511753173

[LiberalArkie]

1. Discussion of Democratic Party candidates are not allowed in GD-P?

[retrowire]

2. how dare you question other supporters!!

I swear, the meta rules are sometimes useless. You called no one out specifically. Your post was as pointed as the abundant Bernie Bro comment that's thrown about. You were describing a group on this site. That's it. stupid hide.

[SHRED]

3. They let this stand...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1726853

I sent this to the mod who locked me.

[retrowire]

4. Good move sending that to the mod.

That's as similar to your OP as anything.

[SHRED]

5. The mod said...

...it wasn't reported.
and that they work of alerted threads.

[retrowire]

7. I alerted it with this:

"This post was modded: http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511753173 So this post should be modded just the same."

[SHRED]

8. Nice

[SHRED]

10. I'll keep checking back

Not locked yet.

[SHRED]

13. Looks like double standard

They aren't locking it.

[m-lekktor]

6. It's still getting recc'd though locked!

I know because I just recc'd it and it went up 2 or 3 numbers so that means I wasn't the online one at about the same time!

[Bjornsdotter]

9. Gave it a rec! n't

[HooptieWagon]

11. It's been quite evident there's a double standard.

[Hiraeth]

12. Rec'd it

ouch!

[Autumn]

14. The host called it disruptive Meta and for Bernie supporters if any words

are used that could be interpreted to refer to DU or DUers, in your case these words

Judging by the posts here

are what made it Meta. Leave those words out and repost it.

[SHRED]

15. Look at this title...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1726853

And it's not locked.

[Autumn]

16. A host who wants it left can always say it's not talking about DUers because it doesn't

use the word here.