Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 03:22 PM Apr 2016

Now this is interesting- This looks like possible proof electoral fraud was committed to favor HRC

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511864073


Quote:

"Why it is 99.9% certain electoral fraud was committed for Hillary Clinton"


When the exit polls are way off, either the polls are wrong, electoral fraud was committed, or both.

In every primary I could find data for, the Republican primaries have been almost exactly right, with every data point in the margin of error, during a more polarizing, contentious, and hard-to-predict race. Hence, this should be enough to prove my point: if exit polls were unreliable, then the Republican primaries would have equally bad exit polling data, but they don’t, not even by a long shot.

Thus, there’s a 99.9% probability that systemic electoral fraud was committed favoring Hillary Clinton. It demands an independent investigation, with the nomination results thoroughly, fairly, and properly audited.

But this isn’t the only evidence of electoral fraud…



That sure makes sense to me...

The original thread is in GD-P at the above URL
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Now this is interesting- This looks like possible proof electoral fraud was committed to favor HRC (Original Post) Baobab Apr 2016 OP
More than interesting. Rigged. bkkyosemite Apr 2016 #1
read the grey Baobab Apr 2016 #2
The powers that be Cassiopeia Apr 2016 #3
Kicking nt LiberalElite Apr 2016 #4

Cassiopeia

(2,603 posts)
3. The powers that be
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 07:16 PM
Apr 2016

Are what they are for a reason. I had a feeling this would be the case before the first vote was cast.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Now this is interesting- ...