Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumMust read for Bernie supporters
http://progressivearmy.com/2016/05/05/the-poky-little-primary/Meteor Man
(385 posts)The Recue Game is based on Transactional Analysis, which examines the roles that people play in social situations, rather than focus on the inner conflicts experienced by the patient. The pop psychology classic I'm OK, You're OK was based on transactional analysis.
Here's how we play the game as described by The Archdruid:
Heres how it works. Each group of players is assigned one of three roles: Victim, Persecutor, or Rescuer. The first two roles are allowed one move each: the Victims move is to suffer, and the Persecutors move is to make the Victim suffer. The Rescuer is allowed two moves: to sympathize with the Victim and to punish the Persecutor. No other moves are allowed, and no player is allowed to make a move that belongs to a different role.
That may seem unduly limited. Its not, because when a group of people is assigned a role, all their actions are redefined as the move or moves allotted to that role. In the Rescue Game, in other words, whatever a Victim does must be interpreted as a cry of pain. Whatever a Persecutor does is treated as something thats intended to cause pain to a Victim, and whatever a Rescuer does, by definition, either expresses sympathy for a Victim or inflicts well-deserved punishment on a Persecutor. This is true even when the actions performed by the three people in question happen to be identical. In a well-played Rescue Game, quite a bit of ingenuity can go into assigning every action its proper meaning as a move.
Whats more, the roles are collective, not individual. Each Victim is equal to every other Victim, and is expected to feel and resent all the suffering ever inflicted on every other Victim in the same game. Each Persecutor is equal to every other Persecutor, and so is personally to blame for every suffering inflicted by every other Persecutor in the same game. Each Rescuer, in turn, is equal to every other Rescuer, and so may take personal credit for the actions of every other Rescuer in the same game. This allows the range of potential moves to expand to infinity without ever leaving the narrow confines of the game.
That's the long story short summary. Click the link for historical examples and additional nuances of The Rescue Game. Both political parties are engaged in the rescue game at a sophisticsted level. We have all encountered variations in our personal life, at work and at Dkos and DU. Check it out:
[link:http://thearchdruidreport.blogspot.com/2016/04/american-narratives-rescue-game.html?m=1|]
[link:http://thearchdruidreport.blogspot.com/2016/04/american-narratives-rescue-game.html?m=1|]
And connect the dots for me
How, exactly, do the parties play this game?
And how does it relate to the OP?
Seems to me that transactional politics is why we're in this mess to begin with. One of the reasons, anyway.
Meteor Man
(385 posts)I was doing soooo good. Had links mastered I thought. I tried three times. No luck.
Google "Archdruid Rescue Game".
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)Last weeks post here on The Archdruid Report, with its analysis of the way that affluent white liberals use accusations of racism as a dog whistle for their own bigotry toward wage-earning Americans, got a flurry of emails and attempted comments trying to push the discussion back into the officially approved narrative of race in the United States. That came as no surprise, at least to me. Every society has a set of acceptable narratives that frame public discourse on any controversial subject, and trying to get past the narrow confines of any such narrative inevitably brings some form of pushback.
Depending on the society and the era, the pushback can quite readily include such entertainments as being burnt at the stake for heresy, so I dont feel any need to complain about the really rather mild response I got. At the same time, though, I dont propose to back down. Every society, as just noted, has a set of narratives that confine discourse on controversial subjects to approved channels, but tolerably often those approved channels exclude crucial details and head off necessary questions. In todays United States, in particular, the facts concerning nearly every significant crisis we face can be divided up neatly into two entirely separate categories. The facts that most Americans are willing to talk about belong to one of these categories; the facts that matter most belong to the other.
Thus one of the things I plan on doing over the months ahead is talking about some of the narratives that keep most people in todays America from discussing, or for that matter noticing, the most crucial forces dragging this country down to ruin. Such an examination could as well start with any of those narrativesas Charles Fort pointed out, one traces a circle starting anywherebut given the response to last weeks post, we might as well start with the accepted narrative about race.
Its probably necessary to reiterate that this discussion is about narratives, not about the things that the narratives are supposed to describe. If you want to hear about the realities of racial privilege, racial prejudice, and racial injustice in the United States, you need to talk to the people of color who have to deal with those things day in and day out, not to a middle-aged white intellectual like me, whos by and large been sheltered from that dimension of the American experience. People of color, on the other hand, have had very little influence on the officially approved narrative of race in the United States. Like most of the narratives that shape our collective discourse, thats been crafted primarily by middle-aged white intellectuals with college educations and salary-class backgrounds: that is, people like me. If I sing you some of the songs of my people, in other words, I hope you wont mind.
Snip ...
for the link.
Rebkeh
(2,450 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Rebkeh
(2,450 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Where he talks about conversations with Democrats is something I have also experienced. I would rather talk to RepubliCONs about Hillary than Bernie supporters. CONs: Benghazi Bernie supporters: Honduras, Libya, Iraq, Goldman Sacs, Voter Suppression, Lolita Express, Home Brewed very Illegal Server, Clinton Foundation Slush Fund or Bombs for Bucks, Abortion Compromise, Insulting our Children, David Brockworst, Sniper Fire, No We Can't, Air of Entitlement, $485,000 speech to Deutsche Bank, Delaware Address, Guccifer, BFFs with Sidney Blumenthal, Henry Kissinger, and her Lack of Good Judgement. She also has a whole lotta lot of slimy Friends.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)Clinton.