Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yuiyoshida

(41,861 posts)
Mon May 9, 2016, 03:40 PM May 2016

The Evidence That Makes The ‘Bernie Bro’ Smear Look All The Worse



There’s strikingly little evidence to indicate Bernie Sanders’ supporters are particularly sexist. By contrast, there’s every reason to think Clinton’s campaign has pushed the talking point, writes Michael Brull.

Last week I argued that there was some evidence that Hillary Clinton’s campaign was connected to the tawdry smears of the “Bernie Bros”. These were claims that Sander’s supporters are white males, whose political views and actions are driven by sexism. This worked as an effective way to claim the moral high ground for Clinton supporters, without Clinton needing to support or offer any relevant policy concessions. It served to divert attention from Clinton’s reactionary and imperialist policies, and from the scrutiny Clinton has been under for the millions of dollars she has received from Wall Street for her speeches to the big banks. Yet the Clinton campaign’s cynical manipulation of the issue of sexism for partisan gain, whilst serving the interests of America’s one percent, has mostly escaped critical scrutiny.

Since writing my article, I’ve come across some more evidence that I think corroborates my thesis.

In my article, I noted that Clinton herself mostly avoided accusations of sexism. Trump’s gratuitous insults to women are legion, but Clinton has mostly avoided accusing him of sexism, other than recently riffing off his accusation that she plays the woman card. Clinton also implied Sanders was being sexist for saying in a debate that it was not constructive to shout about gun policy. I argued that Clinton had mostly avoided these kinds of claims because accusations of sexism, particular accusations regarded as unwarranted and politically motivated, can result in serious declines in male support.

https://newmatilda.com/2016/05/09/the-evidence-that-makes-the-bernie-bro-smear-look-all-the-worse/?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=socialnetwork
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

catnhatnh

(8,976 posts)
1. Wow-just fuckin' WOW!
Mon May 9, 2016, 03:55 PM
May 2016

This post is bound to be buried by Hillary supporters posts that apologize for believing the "Bernie Bro" hoax now that it has been exposed.

mindwalker_i

(4,407 posts)
2. The reason for this is very simple
Mon May 9, 2016, 03:59 PM
May 2016

Hillary doesn't have any ideas on which to run for president, unlike Bernie who is running to change the economic "situation" of increasing income inequality and accompanying fraud. Her whole campaign is about being the first woman president. So she's about fighting sexism, and threw in racism since they are closely related.

Trump comes along and is the perfect person for her to run against. He says a bunch of shit that sexist and racist, and she is fighting against him. He's a straw man made into a little boy, and it giver her campaign a life it wouldn't otherwise have had. Bernie comes along and her campaign is definitely not set up to deal with him. The solution is to make him into Trump, or a close relative. The "Bernie Bro" things was invented by Hillary to make Bernie into what she's fighting.

Will this make a good president?

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
8. Of course its a total fabrication. There is one candidate who laughed at a 12 yo.rape victim though.
Mon May 9, 2016, 07:32 PM
May 2016

And its on tape

The real Hillary Clinton

ebayfool

(3,411 posts)
4. Spot on! It’s almost as though Clinton’s campaign cynically crafted a dog whistle.
Mon May 9, 2016, 04:45 PM
May 2016

snip/

It’s almost as though Clinton’s campaign cynically crafted a dog whistle. It appeals to Democrat voting women in the primaries, in a way that seems feminist, without offering any real concessions to women. It also offers plausible deniability, as Clinton herself stays at a respectable distance from the smears, which have crumbled under every empirical study attempted thus far. Clinton doesn’t lose any popularity for attacking Sanders, or for using the issue of sexism for narrow political gain.

It’s very likely at this point that Clinton will be the Democratic nominee. Whatever effectiveness these tactics have had, any subsequent exposure to them may affect public perceptions of feminism, and the legitimacy of Clinton if she wins the presidency. Her backers on Wall Street, by contrast, are unlikely to be too troubled by her campaign’s tactics.

Raster

(20,998 posts)
5. "...almost as though Clinton's campaign cynically crafted a dog whistle."
Mon May 9, 2016, 05:23 PM
May 2016

There is NO "almost as though" to it. The Clinton campaign smear masters knew exactly what they were doing.

arikara

(5,562 posts)
6. They are going to find out to their great chagrin
Mon May 9, 2016, 05:37 PM
May 2016

That the Bernie supporters will not move over to Mrs Clinton easily after being treated like shit. Especially with her now triangulating right, in other words showing her true colours already.

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
9. It has nothing to with being treated liks shit and everything to do with the fact that she's evil
Mon May 9, 2016, 07:37 PM
May 2016

For example, listen to her laughing at a 12 year old gang rape victim here.

Since she is pretending to be a caring human being when she clearly isn't, this issue is relevant.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»The Evidence That Makes T...