Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

merrily

(45,251 posts)
Mon May 23, 2016, 10:28 AM May 2016

The Sit Down and Shut Up Award and Other Realities*

[CENTER][IMG][/IMG][/CENTER]

In a way, this post is about a chair and an award. However, it really is about us (the left). So, before I go further, I need to make some observations about the left/us that may not be popular.

Admittedly, this is a broad generalization, but please bear with me. The right does a lot of long-range, systematic planning, plotting and "fail-safe-ing," while the left tends to expect people to be good and things to go as they should. When expectations don't manifest, the left sometimes goes into laser-focused, reactive mode. On such occasions, we could do with more of taking a breath, stepping back and assessing the situation and the big picture. Twice. And, in general, we could do with more short-term and long-range planning. Lots. I freely admit that I am among the members of the left who are most in need of this advice.

Second, those on the right excel at framing and manipulation. In the short-term, we need to avoid buying into, and being constricted by, their framing. They don't have a right to chose the which game we'll be playing and which field we will be playing it on, and then restrict us to playing defense. In the long-term, we need to best the right at both framing and choosing the playing field--if we should play at all.

Third, when very young, I heard an expression from an older person that has stayed with me, even if I have not lived it: "Believe none of what you hear and only half of what you see." As an adult in 2016, I don't recommend believing even half of what we see.

Now that I have alienated everyone whom I love, I will get to the (drum roll) lifted chair debacle.

A. Was the "chair lifter" an actual supporter of Bernie? Are the people making the threats actually even supporters of Bernie? How can we tell?

Whatever the chair lifter did or did not do, who knows if he is even a Bernie supporter? The Hillary campaign (including PACs) has used a number of different false flag ops. An early one that hit the news was fake Twitter and facebook fans, something I thought no candidate would risk after Newt Gingrich got outed for hiring facebook "likers." Another op, one that Brock announced, is a million dollars worth (at least) of pro-Hillary internet trolls.

[CENTER][IMG][/IMG][/CENTER]

A third false flag operation is one that some of us spotted as early as 2014. A phalanx of fake Bernie supporters, aka Bernie Butters,™ would mechanically announce "I support Bernie Sanders, but...." Then, the poseurs would criticize Bernie or defend or praise Hillary. They never criticized Hillary. They rarely, if ever, complimented or praised Bernie. Or, they might compliment Bernie on one vaguely-worded category. Then, at some point, one of more of them would find some lame reason why he or she simply could "no longer support Bernie," such as the data breach (as if Bernie had been at the computer). Later, one or more would find that he or she just could not continue to support Bernie because of--wait for it--the behavior on Twitter of his supporters, the Obama boys Bernie Bros. It was like dominoes.

When outed for having faked their support for Bernie, they would lash out and flail. Meanwhile, in each instance, the true supporters of Sanders would have been goaded and provoked, which would invariably go unmentioned. This pattern/op, now known as #BernieLostMe, has appeared on message boards, in social media and in the press. I have, however, never once encountered it among people I know "in real life."

So, with all the false flag operations that we know about, is it really far-fetched to wonder if someone may have hired people, perhaps actors, to disrupt in person?

B. When a new story erupts and consumes media oxygen (and therefore the attention of the general public), we need to notice which news stories our attention is being diverted AWAY from.

C. We (the left) either need to learn media or raise enough money to hire someone knowledgeable.

D. We need to find some way to discourage media from disseminating one side of a story.

This would have been the non-event that it should have been, had it not been for media breathlessly and incessantly reporting Lange's version of events as though it were (a) the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth; (b) VERY important; and (c) conclusive proof of the one-sided, misandryist and utterly bogus Obama boys Bernie Bros propaganda that media has been catapulting. [url]http://www.npr.org/sections/ombudsman/2016/05/18/478579787/fact-checking-nprs-reports-on-vegas-violence[/url]

Does establishment media collude with the political establishment? I believe it does. Either way, however, establishment media is disserving the country. For its precipitous, inaccurate, inflammatory and possibly collusive coverage, media richly deserve a Sit Down And Shut Up Award.

*Some of you may have seen this post elsewhere, but it's here as well for those who have not.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
1. The left mistakenly assumes Americans are smart enough
Mon May 23, 2016, 10:39 AM
May 2016

to hear the truth and draw their own conclusions. The "right" understands that Americans are not all that smart and that they will believe anything if it is repeated emphatically and often.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
2. We need to stop assuming and start messaging better.
Mon May 23, 2016, 10:56 AM
May 2016

Cheney in 2004 - Senator Kerry was for the Iraq War before he was against it.

Now, name something Kerry said during a 2004 debate.

See what I mean?

LovingA2andMI

(7,006 posts)
3. We need to start Supporting INDEPENDENT Media...
Mon May 23, 2016, 11:06 AM
May 2016

So They Can Become Large Enough to Counteract the MSM.

Here's a source of Independent Media To LIKE (and they are strong Bernie supporters): Independent Underground News & Talk

merrily

(45,251 posts)
4. I have supported them, but the networks and mainstream publications and
Mon May 23, 2016, 11:08 AM
May 2016

their sister websites still have to be dealt with.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
6. The only thing we can do is refuse to watch them in hopes their ratings will go down AND
Mon May 23, 2016, 01:27 PM
May 2016

instead watch independent news & hope their ratings will go up.

It's going to take a long, long time to make that shift where they will actually notice. Unfortunately.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
8. Yes. However, msm are owned by such big conglomerates, I am not sure it matters if we boycott.
Mon May 23, 2016, 01:33 PM
May 2016

It may be worth it to them to have a propaganda arm, even if it does not make money.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»The Sit Down and Shut Up ...