Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumdaleanime
(17,796 posts)Debboe Wasserman Schultz enough.
merrily
(45,251 posts)ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)There's no way she should still be in that position after the fucking disaster of 2014.
appalachiablue
(41,146 posts)----
tularetom
(23,664 posts)Why does the party put up with this crap?
merrily
(45,251 posts)I imagine it's very similar to the reason I eat potato chips. (I like them.)
More often than we seem to want to admit, people hit exactly what they aimed at.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Democratic voters.
Six debates make Hillary's money worth more than it would be worth if we had more debates.
Hillary is the only candidate with the money to buy a lot of TV and radio ads and coverage.
Debbie Wasserman-Schultz offers no good reason for limiting the number of debates to six.
Debbie Wasserman-Schultz is simply wrong about the number of debates we need.
We don't need 20.
Ten would be great.
Six is too few.
We should have started already.
October is too late to start the Democratic debates.
This debate schedule favors Trump. I have even heard Democrats say they like him.
Debbie Wasserman-Schulz is not a good choice for DNC chair. She lost the 2014 eleciton miserably and now she is messing up our chances in 2016.
Why is she the chair?
She is a horrible choice.
I fear that her election is yet another example of Democrats in office being too "nice" to do what is best for America.
appalachiablue
(41,146 posts)DWS be permitted to stay on? We need to demand a change in DNC Chair, NOW! It's our country and our future !%@?!
Tomorrow I'm contacting my Senator Tim Kaine & Gov. Terry McAuliffe, former DNC Chair, maybe others about this outrage.
SHRED
(28,136 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Why the hell is she still in this position!
pablo_marmol
(2,375 posts)......but I do picture myself grinding a hard, stale pecan pie into their face.
I've got a pie for this woman.