Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Debbie Wasserman Schultz says 6 debates enough (Original Post) leftcoastmountains Sep 2015 OP
Daleanime says.... daleanime Sep 2015 #1
Exactly my thought. merrily Sep 2015 #10
this woman needs to be gone STAT ibegurpard Sep 2015 #2
Is there a doctor in the house? Dr. Dean! Paging Dr. Dean, SOS! appalachiablue Sep 2015 #3
6 debates would be 6 too many if the subject was if Debbie WS should be fired tularetom Sep 2015 #4
Take a guess. merrily Sep 2015 #11
Six debates make it harder for candidates with less money to reach the broad base of JDPriestly Sep 2015 #5
This is unbelievably unfair to the candidates, us the voters and democrats. How long will appalachiablue Sep 2015 #6
Queen Debbie needs to go! SHRED Sep 2015 #7
Gee, will Deb! lead us into ANOTHER disaster? SoapBox Sep 2015 #8
When people upset me like DWS does, I don't think violent thoughts, per se....... pablo_marmol Sep 2015 #9
This is so disturbing. Enthusiast Sep 2015 #12

ibegurpard

(16,685 posts)
2. this woman needs to be gone STAT
Tue Sep 8, 2015, 07:27 PM
Sep 2015

There's no way she should still be in that position after the fucking disaster of 2014.

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
4. 6 debates would be 6 too many if the subject was if Debbie WS should be fired
Tue Sep 8, 2015, 07:33 PM
Sep 2015

Why does the party put up with this crap?

merrily

(45,251 posts)
11. Take a guess.
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 06:04 AM
Sep 2015

I imagine it's very similar to the reason I eat potato chips. (I like them.)

More often than we seem to want to admit, people hit exactly what they aimed at.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
5. Six debates make it harder for candidates with less money to reach the broad base of
Tue Sep 8, 2015, 07:42 PM
Sep 2015

Democratic voters.

Six debates make Hillary's money worth more than it would be worth if we had more debates.

Hillary is the only candidate with the money to buy a lot of TV and radio ads and coverage.

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz offers no good reason for limiting the number of debates to six.

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz is simply wrong about the number of debates we need.

We don't need 20.

Ten would be great.

Six is too few.

We should have started already.

October is too late to start the Democratic debates.

This debate schedule favors Trump. I have even heard Democrats say they like him.

Debbie Wasserman-Schulz is not a good choice for DNC chair. She lost the 2014 eleciton miserably and now she is messing up our chances in 2016.

Why is she the chair?
She is a horrible choice.

I fear that her election is yet another example of Democrats in office being too "nice" to do what is best for America.

appalachiablue

(41,146 posts)
6. This is unbelievably unfair to the candidates, us the voters and democrats. How long will
Tue Sep 8, 2015, 08:01 PM
Sep 2015

DWS be permitted to stay on? We need to demand a change in DNC Chair, NOW! It's our country and our future !%@?!

Tomorrow I'm contacting my Senator Tim Kaine & Gov. Terry McAuliffe, former DNC Chair, maybe others about this outrage.

pablo_marmol

(2,375 posts)
9. When people upset me like DWS does, I don't think violent thoughts, per se.......
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 03:01 AM
Sep 2015

......but I do picture myself grinding a hard, stale pecan pie into their face.

I've got a pie for this woman.
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Debbie Wasserman Schultz ...