Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

Uncle Joe

(58,364 posts)
Fri May 10, 2019, 11:36 AM May 2019

I applaud Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes for sounding the alarm on the dangers




and the article Bernie is referring to.



(snip)

As a result of all this, would-be competitors can’t raise the money to take on Facebook. Investors realize that if a company gets traction, Facebook will copy its innovations, shut it down or acquire it for a relatively modest sum. So despite an extended economic expansion, increasing interest in high-tech start-ups, an explosion of venture capital and growing public distaste for Facebook, no major social networking company has been founded since the fall of 2011.

As markets become more concentrated, the number of new start-up businesses declines. This holds true in other high-tech areas dominated by single companies, like search (controlled by Google) and e-commerce (taken over by Amazon). Meanwhile, there has been plenty of innovation in areas where there is no monopolistic domination, such as in workplace productivity (Slack, Trello, Asana), urban transportation (Lyft, Uber, Lime, Bird) and cryptocurrency exchanges (Ripple, Coinbase, Circle).

(snip)

Since the 1970s, courts have become increasingly hesitant to break up companies or block mergers unless consumers are paying inflated prices that would be lower in a competitive market. But a narrow reliance on whether or not consumers have experienced price gouging fails to take into account the full cost of market domination. It doesn’t recognize that we also want markets to be competitive to encourage innovation and to hold power in check. And it is out of step with the history of antitrust law. Two of the last major antitrust suits, against AT&T and IBM in the 1980s, were grounded in the argument that they had used their size to stifle innovation and crush competition.

As the Columbia law professor Tim Wu writes, “It is a disservice to the laws and their intent to retain such a laserlike focus on price effects as the measure of all that antitrust was meant to do.”

(snip)

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/09/opinion/sunday/chris-hughes-facebook-zuckerberg.html



If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I applaud Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes for sounding the alarm on the dangers (Original Post) Uncle Joe May 2019 OP
Chris Hughes is on CNN now. Uncle Joe May 2019 #1
I watched the interview at the gym. nycbos May 2019 #2
 

Uncle Joe

(58,364 posts)
1. Chris Hughes is on CNN now.
Fri May 10, 2019, 11:47 AM
May 2019

It just finished but there will probably be a video of the interview before long.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

nycbos

(6,034 posts)
2. I watched the interview at the gym.
Fri May 10, 2019, 11:54 AM
May 2019

It seemed to me at least that it was difficult for him to speak out because of his relationship with Zuckerberg.

He did it anyway which I give him credit for.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»I applaud Facebook co-fou...