Just curious why Kamala Harris, at 11% is shown after Warren, who also is at 11%...

[FailureToCommunicate]

If they're even in the DU polls, you would think at least their position be shown alphabetically,no?

"Harris" before "Warren"

Am I missing something?

[Ace Rothstein]

1. There is probably an unseen decimal.

[highplainsdem]

3. Yep.

[highplainsdem]

2. The admins explained earlier that they're rounding to whole numbers in the display there,

but their actual calculations are more precise, so they know that Harris currently has less support here than Warren does.

[hlthe2b]

4. Because it is based on percent... thus the percentage with decimal points must be higher for Warren

e.g., 11.1% is greater than 11.2% though still rounds to 11%.

[True Dough]

5. Warren and Harris have shifted positions here on the DU a few times over the past couple of days

Their support here is almost identical. Just takes a few people to push one in front of the other at this point in time.

[MineralMan]

6. The numbers following the decimal point.

That's what you're missing. The numbers are rounded to the nearest integer digit. Apparently Harris's numbers are lower than Warren's.

[Politicub]

7. Convince more people to choose Harris and you'll see the order flip

Warren has been steadily moving up in the rankings over the past few weeks. It's no surprise why she's positioned there.

[shraby]

8. Alphabetical order.

[FailureToCommunicate]

10. Maybe in Trump's alphabet.

[Trumpocalypse]

9. Rounding! nt