Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

RDANGELO

(3,433 posts)
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 01:30 AM Jun 2019

Having ten people on the stage at once for the debates is rediculous.

The candidates can probably get a lot more accomplished in the town halls than they can with these debates. With the little speaking time that they are likely to get in, I don't see how most of the candidates will be able to get a coherent or memorable message across, and it will not be very informative to the viewers. The Republicans tried this four years ago, and some of the candidates were virtually ignored. I don't think it worked well. It will probably be disadvantageous to to Biden Because everyone will be taking shots at him. If he skips the debate, he will be criticized for that. I think it would be much more desirable to spread it out over more days with four or five people on the stage. Maybe the network wouldn't go for that.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Having ten people on the stage at once for the debates is rediculous. (Original Post) RDANGELO Jun 2019 OP
Some candidates will be ignored... VarryOn Jun 2019 #1
The problem with a debate Doreen Jun 2019 #2
Taking it further rpannier Jun 2019 #3
Several of our candidates are good at succinct made-for-TV answers. marylandblue Jun 2019 #13
Instead of 20 candidates, 10 on each of 2 nights Eric J in MN Jun 2019 #4
Agreed. honest.abe Jun 2019 #15
FYI.. Cha Jun 2019 #5
It is ridiculous unless they give each candidate equal time. 5 at the most would be better. YOHABLO Jun 2019 #6
It's early, for the two summer debates it's fine, then the 2% threshold kicks in... 4139 Jun 2019 #7
True. It's ridiculous. Honeycombe8 Jun 2019 #8
Very few people would watch 4 consecutive nights of debate candidates. brooklynite Jun 2019 #9
Relatively few people will watch two nights of debates. MineralMan Jun 2019 #10
They will watch the sound bites on the news. marylandblue Jun 2019 #11
Yes. Brief clips of a few candidates will appear on the evening news. MineralMan Jun 2019 #12
People will complain no matter how it's done. BannonsLiver Jun 2019 #14
 

VarryOn

(2,343 posts)
1. Some candidates will be ignored...
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 01:43 AM
Jun 2019

and there wont be enough time for thoughtful and thorough answers. And everyone will be vying to stand out. I just expect to be wholey unsatisfied.

My hope is the field will drop quickly in the next couple of months to 7 or 8 candidates. Then, the debates can hopefully be more informative.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Doreen

(11,686 posts)
2. The problem with a debate
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 01:53 AM
Jun 2019

is that the candidates are going to be attacking each other bringing each other down in a bad way to their followers. This results in making it harder for the followers to switch if their candidate does not win. It also makes it harder for the candidates to get their followers to go over after they spew all of the crap about their opponents.

There are to many candidates and making things harder to get to the general election.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

rpannier

(24,330 posts)
3. Taking it further
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 02:28 AM
Jun 2019

The moderators often ask questions to invite that kind of behavior

And... they ask questions that are either so simplistic and inane as to be meaningless; see Wolf Blitzer, "Who believes in evolution. Raise your hand."
Or a policy question on the Middle East, China, Russia, health care, global warming, whatever and they have 30 seconds to a couple of minutes to explain their plan

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
13. Several of our candidates are good at succinct made-for-TV answers.
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 09:47 AM
Jun 2019

It's a requirement for success in modern politics.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
4. Instead of 20 candidates, 10 on each of 2 nights
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 02:48 AM
Jun 2019

...it should have been 10 candidates, 5 on each of 2 nights.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Cha

(297,323 posts)
5. FYI..
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 02:53 AM
Jun 2019

It's "Ridiculous".

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
6. It is ridiculous unless they give each candidate equal time. 5 at the most would be better.
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 04:22 AM
Jun 2019

I can't believe we're 17 months out and already these MSM political wonks are having debates. Who knows, maybe Biden won't be such a shoo-in.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

4139

(1,893 posts)
7. It's early, for the two summer debates it's fine, then the 2% threshold kicks in...
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 06:19 AM
Jun 2019

... there will be 10 or less by the September debate

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
8. True. It's ridiculous.
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 07:44 AM
Jun 2019

But it does give us an opportunity to compare their demeanor and voices.

Biden will probably "win," since he'll be featured in the middle because his numbers are higher. This gives the one in the middle the advantage at the debate (Trump was in the middle). But the one in the middle does, after all, have the hghest numbers.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

brooklynite

(94,601 posts)
9. Very few people would watch 4 consecutive nights of debate candidates.
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 08:04 AM
Jun 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
10. Relatively few people will watch two nights of debates.
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 09:29 AM
Jun 2019

I'm guessing 3-4 million viewers, max. I'd be interested to see how many of those stick it out for the entire broadcast, too.

Debates between two nominees, on the other hand, will attract a very large audience. We're going to have to wait for more than a year for those debates, though.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
11. They will watch the sound bites on the news.
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 09:42 AM
Jun 2019

Which worked well for Trump because he always had a nasty sound bite to throw at someone.


It will be the same this time. Whoever has the best sound bite wins (hopefully not a nasty one). Whoever gaffes badly, loses (Joe, please don't end your career this way).

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
12. Yes. Brief clips of a few candidates will appear on the evening news.
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 09:45 AM
Jun 2019

The cable news opinion shows will show more of them, but their viewership is also low, compared to the voting population.

Reducing the amount of time each candidate will have to a minute or two will generate plenty of sound bites, I'm sure.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

BannonsLiver

(16,396 posts)
14. People will complain no matter how it's done.
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 11:22 AM
Jun 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Having ten people on the ...