Democratic Primaries
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders defends staff compensation after complaints his campaign isn't paying $15 an hour
https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/elections/presidential/caucus/2019/07/19/bernie-sanders-campaign-staff-wage-15-hour-union-elizabeth-warren-campaign-wages/1781159001/"I'm very proud to be the first presidential candidate to recognize a union and negotiate a union contract," the Vermont senator and presidential candidate told the Des Moines Register in an interview Friday. "And that contract was ratified by the employees of the campaign, and it not only provides pay of at least $15 an hour, it also provides, I think, the best health care benefits that any employer can provide for our field organizers."
He also expressed frustration that staffers had taken their complaints to the media.
"It does bother me that people are going outside of the process and going to the media," he said. "That is really not acceptable. It is really not what labor negotiations are about, and it's improper."
That bolded paragraph? I've heard the exact same sentiment from corporations. Going to the public is exactly what workers *should* do when they're not getting anywhere with the process they have. I am utterly unimpressed and unsurprised -- this tactic is Organizing 101 and he blew the response.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
George II
(67,782 posts)So essentially he's calling his workers liars, and upset they went "outside of the process". Maybe they had to do that because they're not getting anywhere in those already completed negotiations that they're negotiating?
More from the article:
"We are disappointed that some individuals have decided to damage the integrity of these efforts. We are involved in negotiations. And some are individuals that have decided to damage the integrity of that process before they were concluded."
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Thekaspervote
(32,767 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
According to The Washington Post, some members of Sanders' campaign team have been lobbying to raise their wages so that they make the $15 hourly rate that the Vermont senator has frequently called for both on the campaign trail and in Washington D.C.
The Post obtained a draft of a letter that the campaign's union planned to send to Sanders' campaign manager Faiz Shakir which read in part that workers "cannot be expected to build the largest grassroots organizing program in American history while making poverty wages. Given our campaign's commitment to fighting for a living wage of at least $15.00 an hour, we believe it is only fair that the campaign would carry through this commitment to its own field team."
The letter states that field organizers are working at least 60 hours a week, which lowers the average per hour pay to $13 an hour.
UPDATE (7/19 3:20 p.m.): The Sanders campaign said it will reduce staff hours to ensure everyone makes $15 an hour.
"Many field staffers are barely managing to survive financially, which is severely impacting our team's productivity and morale. Some field organizers have already left the campaign as a result," the letter said...
Read More: https://www.newsweek.com/sanders-campaign-battles-staff-demanding-15-hourly-pay-which-candidate-says-should-federal-1450103
.............
I don't get it. Here is a candidate that has made a $15 minimum a main stay in his campaigns for the last, what, 6 years not pay his own staff that very wage.
Do as I say and not as I do, does not a leader make.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)The whole thing reveals much. And I'll just leave it at that for obvious reasons.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
MichMan
(11,929 posts)Then it doesn't make any sense to complain about it now. If you dont like the agreement between management and the union, than vote it down and continue bargaining.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,345 posts)This is particularly common when new places organize and the kinks need to be ironed out. They're following the process to implement change, but want it to go faster. There's nothing that says they can't appeal to the public to help add some pressure.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
MichMan
(11,929 posts)I totally understand trying to apply pressure during contract negotiations and bargaining.
From my understanding reading the link, the union has already voted in favor and ratified their contract with the Sanders campaign, so complaining about it now seems to be too late. If they thought it wasn't acceptable they should have voted it down.
"I'm very proud to be the first presidential candidate to recognize a union and negotiate a union contract," the Vermont senator and presidential candidate told the Des Moines Register in an interview Friday. "And that contract was ratified by the employees of the campaign, and it not only provides pay of at least $15 an hour, it also provides, I think, the best health care benefits that any employer can provide for our field organizers."
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,345 posts)they'd be expected to work 60-hour weeks for the annual pay they're getting. Could be an oversight by the negotiating committee, who knows -- they may have thought they were protected. But both sides touted the $15/hour wage that had been negotiated -- if it turns out that in reality that's not what the workers affected by the complaint and contract are getting for the work they do, the Sanders campaign could get investigated.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Me.
(35,454 posts)With a 60 hour workweek.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)Which is the subject of many disputes after the contract is signed. In this case, it appears the organizers are salaried employees at assumed 40-hour work weeks, but are being forced to work 60 hours a week without overtime. Maybe the union should have foreseen this, but if they didn't, then the workers complain about it, the union has to bring it up with management...
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
spooky3
(34,452 posts)most at that pay rate would be exempt positions and if non-exempt would be paid time and a half for hours over 40 per week, right? If you are an employer covered by this act, you can't simply designate employees as "salaried" in order to cause them to be exempt. The statute is very clear about what constitutes exempt categories.
The working hours per week should have been set explicitly as part of the contract negotiations.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
silentEcho
(424 posts)to determine their hourly pay. Generally it fluctuates. I am getting your point.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
spooky3
(34,452 posts)(Covered) employer must pay overtime. You cant simply designate someone as salaried and refuse to pay time and a half if by law the employee is considered non-exempt.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)The statute isn't all that clear in practice. It was written to protect factory floor employees who do simple, discrete punch a clock, and are under direct supervision. Campaign workers probably don't punch clocks, and may not be closely supervised. In that case, they could be designated exempt while simultaneously be given complex tasks that can't be done in an 8 hour day. That's when you file grievance...
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
spooky3
(34,452 posts)than application only to a factory shop floor.
See this, for example:
https://www.dol.gov/whd/overtime/fs17a_overview.pdf
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)Which is that companies can and often do successfully get around the law. Not only companies. I know of one case where a state government got around it and won in both state and federal court.
Bernie may have just done it. He may even get away with it. It's really not that hard.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
spooky3
(34,452 posts)The question is whether these employees are fairly considered administrative employees, or possibly in another category.
Another question is what does the contract say about working hours?
This case isnt resolved in the law or in the court of public opinion, and the articles so far havent included many facts, so I wouldnt say the Sanders campaign has either done something wrong and gotten away with it, or not done anything wrong.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)was different, with a certain intent and understanding, not that it didn't also apply in other situations. And since then, actual employers have violated the law and gotten away with it. I've seen them do it, so don't tell me they don't Sanders MAY have done it too, but I didn't say for sure that he did. Don't put words in my mouth.
This case is in fact tried in the court of public opinion, because Sanders is running for office. That means every single little thing he does is tried in the court of public opinion and people are free to decide whether to vote for him or not based on whatever criteria they choose. Including whether or not his workers complain about him and how he responds to their complaints.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Demsrule86
(68,576 posts)has to do with ironing out...a wage was promised...not it needs to be delivered.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,345 posts)$15/hour formula. But they're working so much they're getting much less than $15/hour.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
W_HAMILTON
(7,867 posts)Almost immediately -- one to two weeks after ratifying the contract -- the campaign realized that it needed the workers to work longer hours than was negotiated for. It offered to up their pay, but in doing so, it would have run afoul of the other terms agreed to in the union contract, which meant the workers would have been responsibly for paying for more of their healthcare premiums. This is what the two sides have been arguing over for close to two months, with no resolution in sight. Workers become disgruntled as their work weeks approached 60 hours, so, they went public with their grievances.
This is a problem that originated with the campaign -- not the union.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
MichMan
(11,929 posts)Every other union I have ever seen makes sure that is addressed on the contract. Were they that inept?
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
W_HAMILTON
(7,867 posts)It was the campaign that realized -- after the fact -- that the agreed-to hours would not be sufficient for their purposes, and therefore tried to reopen negotiations to fix the problem they themselves created.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
MichMan
(11,929 posts)Work the hours and get the agreed upon overtime pay per the legal contract.
If the campaign imposes wage theft, the employees have grounds to sue and/or strike.
"The UFCW spearheaded the effort to pass the Wage Theft Prevention Act and has long worked to strengthen legislation to ensure workers are paid at the proper rate for the hours they work. The Wage Theft Prevention Act (WTPA) took effect on April 9, 2011 and requires employers to give written notice of wage rates:To each new hire,To all employees by February 1 of each year;
The notice must include: Rate or rates of pay, including overtime rate of pay (if it applies) , How the employee is paid: by the hour, shift, day, week, commission, etc."
http://www.ufcw2013.org/english/advocacy-and-community-involvement/
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
W_HAMILTON
(7,867 posts)What would have been negotiated was the expected hours to be worked. When the campaign realized that the expected hours that they agreed to would not be sufficient, they went back and asked to reopen negotiations. Their new offer was 48 hours at increased pay, but the increased pay ran afoul of the terms already agreed to, which means the workers would have had to pay for more of their premiums.
It is just another in a long line of campaign mismanagement from the Sanders campaign.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
CaptainTruth
(6,591 posts)Really? Workers shouldn't go to the media, & folks running for president shouldn't appear in front of the media to draw attention to labor disputes?
"McDonalds workers striking across the country Thursday have several demands, including raising their minimum wage to $15 minimum. And one of the policys biggest proponents, 2020 presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, emailed his supporters to rally people to the picket lines."
Where he spoke to the media. SMH
[link:https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/evyavk/bernies-campaign-is-showing-solidarity-with-striking-workers-like-no-other-2020-candidate|]
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,345 posts)particular, OR a belief that some people are simply above such unpleasant things as Labor strife, because reasons.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)He needs to negotiate, not complain.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)They clearly do not understand how unions work.
Have a look at the history of Unions in the USA. There have always been moles and disrupters to break them up.
You join a Union with the understanding that the Union will represent you - that you, as an individual, will be represented by the group as a whole. You bring your complaint to the Union, and they negotiate. If the negotiations fail, well, then you're on your own - but they haven't failed, so this is all so much bullshit.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)If the union has employees trying to work around it, then the union is doing a poor job. And if negotiations fail, then you are not on your own. There is always arbitration, mediation, or legal recourse.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)Are there any media releases from the union regarding where things stand as far as negotiations go? Or is this story being propelled by a few lone wolves?
As a note, I meant you are on your own in the advent of complete failure of negotiations. To date, I haven't seen anything official from the union as regards this negotiation.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)This issue was first raised in May 2019 so they've been negotiating for two months regarding jobs that will only exist for 12 to 18 months. That's a long negotiation for a temporary position. On top of that, other campaigns are paying more money.
If I were an union employee who earned less than the prevailing wage while working more hours, damn right I'd be angry at both the union and management. No surprise somebody went public.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
silentEcho
(424 posts)Right. How long can they play this out.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,345 posts)negotiations or disputes.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Gothmog
(145,242 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
kcr
(15,317 posts)I'm not surprised, either.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Gothmog
(145,242 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)"We are involved in negotiations. And some are individuals that have decided to damage the integrity of that process before they were concluded."
And that's how unions work. Going to the public before negotiations break down is how it works when you don't have a union.
I'm guessing many of those complaining are ex-non-union workers, where the only recourse is a public forum.
Baby union. Learning by mistakes. They negotiated and agreed to something that needs tweeking. Not worth alot of wasted ink unless there is a break down in negotiations.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)This is not about a "baby union." This is about employees who believe they are not being represented fairly. I've been in that situation several times myself. It's very frustrating when the union leadership tells you patent nonsense while claiming to represent your interests.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
lapucelle
(18,258 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
silentEcho
(424 posts)To put this in perspective.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)Warren and Buttigieg also pay 100% of healthcare premiums, which Sanders was not willing to do for employees earning over $36,000.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
silentEcho
(424 posts)The other candidates didn't need an union to make sure of equal pay, and no sexual harassment. The other Democratic campaigns did not need an union to force them to pay a livable wage. Sanders attacks Dems on this issue and complains when he does not comply to his own rhetoric. This is not good for Sanders. I absolutely see it coming into play during the debate.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
W_HAMILTON
(7,867 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
lapucelle
(18,258 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
silentEcho
(424 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Gothmog
(145,242 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
lapucelle
(18,258 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Gothmog
(145,242 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
myohmy2
(3,163 posts)...public timing and pressuring of 'boss' Bernie over negotiated benefits and conditions in a ratified contract, impacts more than a corporation's bottom line...it attacks Bernie's character, his honesty, his credibility and the ability to raise money and compete for the nomination...
" "It does bother me that people are going outside of the process and going to the media," he said. "That is really not acceptable. It is really not what labor negotiations are about, and it's improper." "
...and it could destroy his campaign...maybe that is the intent...
...I'm going to keep a close eye on the establishment corporatists out for Bernie with organized attacks or with attacks on other Progressive candidates...
...they're fooling themselves if they think we're not going to respond and vote accordingly...
...hang in there...
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Gothmog
(145,242 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Gothmog
(145,242 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Cha
(297,240 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden