**Another poll with Joe on the go** JB 28% BS 13% EW 11%

[DemocratSinceBirth]

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1b8wZOfldlNWoaN4ajvl-c-g_Vvao-t5C/view

[Thekaspervote]

1. K&R!!!

[oasis]

2. Joe's "on the go" that's all I need to know!

[at140]

5. Trump campaign is guaranteed to release all those photo's

of Biden. And some of those women could surface if he is nominated.

[Cha]

8. We're Not Afraid of what trump is going to do.

[Demsrule86]

18. Really? OMG...he hugged them ...the horror...tried that already so good luck...better worry about

the right using the leftist attacks on Warren about money...all over the place today. Why do we eat our own?

[at140]

20. During primary season, it is best to surface all weaknesses

Eating your own only applies if executed after convention for the general election.
And do not forget Lucy Flores...she is just waiting!

https://www.thecut.com/2019/03/an-awkward-kiss-changed-how-i-saw-joe-biden.html

[oasis]

22. Why don't you just give it a rest until Lucy surfaces again?

[at140]

24. Me giving a rest does not make the issue go away right?

Do you really wish to sweep all problem areas under the rug?
If so, it is your choice, and I will not berate you for it.
I only engage in civil manner and fact based issues.

[oasis]

25. Good luck to all who wish to revive dead issues. Me&Joe have

other fish to fry.

Adios

[LakeArenal]

28. Mmmm fish fry. Let's you and me fry some up.

While I get my socks out of the dryer.

[oasis]

29. I gotta borrow some hot sauce from Hillary.

[LakeArenal]

26. Always a buzz kill in the place

[blm]

27. Please don't use GOP cheap shots against ANY Democrat.

It validates them. I don’t tolerate the use of GOPs bullshit cheap shots for ANY of our D candidates.

[at140]

33. Those cheap shots are coming from other side whether

we like it or not and it is best to bring all vulnerabilities out in open now, instead of after the nomination.

[Sloumeau]

3. Go Joe Go! :)

[NYMinute]

4. Joe Biden ... the nominee and 46th POTUS

Deal with it

[onetexan]

23. I like it! & with Beto as VEEP, i like it even more!

[bluewater]

6. Another online poll of an "internet panel"

"They are members of the Center for Economic and Social Research’s Understanding America Study (UAS)
probability-based internet panel."

The polls are what the polls are.

This one just happens to be an online poll of an internet panel.

[crazytown]

7. Obviously the gold standard of polls

like Morning Consult only better. A big big lead for Biden.

[Skya Rhen]

10. During the 2016 presidential election, Morning Consult had one of the most accurate national polls

despite calling the winner of the election incorrectly, it successfully predicted Hillary Clinton winning the national popular vote by 3 percent (she won by 2.1 percent).

Gold standard is correct...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morning_Consult

[crazytown]

11. You know & I know

if Morning Consult was coming up with results like YouGov, that you would have a very different perspective on this.

[Skya Rhen]

13. If YouGov had a proven track record like Morning Consult, then I would take YouGov's numbers

seriously. Since they have no track record of accurate reporting and since it is the ONLY poll (out of more than a dozen) that looks nothing like the others, I will say that I am correct in not giving it any credence.

I believe in science - statistics is a science...

[crazytown]

14. If you believe in science

I must tell you that Morning Consults primary polls are not comparable with their 2016 GE polls.

[Skya Rhen]

16. As I said, I believe in science not someone's opinion.

[crazytown]

17. Ah ... but it's not opinion.

I actually bother to read the methodology of the polls. The GE polls were interactive interviews of samples, the primary polls are automated forms, sent to the same group of people week after week.

[Demsrule86]

19. you Gov is a bad poll no matter their results...always off.

[at140]

12. Blame me for hacking many internet polls

all you have to do is keep removing the cookie placed by the poll & vote again & again.

[Indykatie]

15. I'm a Biden Supporter but This Poll is Dodgy. It Uses Questionable Methodology and Format.

Perhaps the Williamson supporter who posted it is being sarcastic.

[Scurrilous]

21. K&R

[customerserviceguy]

30. Here's what I'm worried about

30% seems to be VP Biden's floor, but what if his ceiling is only 40%? I can imagine that he'd pick up some support from those who backed Sen. Klobuchar and Mayor Buttigieg, and maybe a stray point or two from Bullock, Delaney, etc. but I see supporters of other candidates such as Sens. Booker and Harris going to either Sens. Sanders or Warren.

The nightmare scenario is where we come to the convention with 40% for Biden, and about 30% each for Sanders and Warren. In other words, 60% wanting a revolutionary Democratic candidate, and then the decision for the superdelgates is "do we push Joe Biden over the top, and risk pissing off that 60%?"

[DemocratSinceBirth]

31. Do we risk nominating the person who didn't get the most votes/delegates?

[customerserviceguy]

32. Do we risk

nominating the governing philosophy that didn't get the most votes/delegates? It's especially compelling on the "votes" part of it, as Joe Biden is liable to pick up delegates in every state in the Union, whereas it is very likely that Sens. Warren and Sanders are going to pick up votes in states where they don't get delegates because of the 15% rule.

What if we get to a point where the combined delegate totals for Warren/Sanders are 60%, but the combined vote totals (in the primary states) work out to somewhat more than that? What if the two of them offer a unity ticket, where Sanders gets to be President for four years, after which he leaves the job, leaving VP Warren to be the standard bearer in 2024 and 2028?

The superdelegates are going to have to think long and hard about their choices, should the math work out that way.