Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

Uncle Joe

(58,349 posts)
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 11:30 AM Sep 2019

Why Bernie Sanders Matters



According to Levitz, Sanders has already “persuaded many 2020 Democratic hopefuls to stop worrying and learn to love social democracy” — therefore, he concludes, Sanders must now be dispensable. It’s like saying that since Fort Knox has never suffered a break-in, there must be no need for all those armed guards.

(snip)

However, a startling indication of how much Sanders has already changed US politics was recently reported by Martin Wattenberg, a political scientist at the University of California Irvine. Every four years since 1956, the American National Election Studies (ANES) has asked voters to describe, in their own words, what they like or dislike about the two parties. It was on the basis of these interviews that the political scientist Philip Converse reached his famous verdict in 1964 that ordinary Americans are, broadly speaking, “innocent of ideology” — that they don’t think in ideological terms.

Political scientists have generally accepted that judgment ever since, along with a corollary notion about American public opinion, advanced in 1967 by the politics scholars Lloyd Free and Hadley Cantril: that Americans tend, on the whole, to be “operationally liberal” (favoring specific liberal policies like Social Security and Medicare) but “philosophically conservative” (rejecting broad expressions of left-wing ideas).

(snip)

In the long run, Democrats “suffer from not forthrightly making ideological arguments,” Grossmann argues; “partially as a result, [the] public maintains conservative predispositions.”

(snip)

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2019/09/bernie-sanders-elizabeth-warren-eric-levitz-2020-presidential-campaign-democratic-nomination

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Bernie Sanders Matters (Original Post) Uncle Joe Sep 2019 OP
Jacobin... NurseJackie Sep 2019 #1
... George II Sep 2019 #2
LOL Gothmog Sep 2019 #3
lol LincolnRossiter Sep 2019 #9
Jacobin is ... left-of-center2012 Sep 2019 #4
Yep, Jacobin is left of center. aidbo Sep 2019 #6
... left-of-center2012 Sep 2019 #22
And of course they take their usual, gratuitous shot at Democrats: George II Sep 2019 #7
Everything is Democrats' fault. betsuni Sep 2019 #34
You omitted a critical information from your own link, was that deliberate? Uncle Joe Sep 2019 #8
The link in the OP is opinion, not reporting fact. George II Sep 2019 #10
Virtually everything put forward by the corporate media conglomerates in regards Uncle Joe Sep 2019 #15
I was responding to this: "We also rate them High for factual reporting." George II Sep 2019 #20
... left-of-center2012 Sep 2019 #24
and again this specifically regarding Jacobin Uncle Joe Sep 2019 #25
... left-of-center2012 Sep 2019 #31
... Uncle Joe Sep 2019 #33
Jacobin is shameless Otto Lidenbrock Sep 2019 #30
ah the old qazplm135 Sep 2019 #5
Bernie matters, and that is what worries me. beastie boy Sep 2019 #11
Mmmm hmm. And going for round 2 of spoiling. -nt. Amimnoch Sep 2019 #23
Bernie wants Democratic support without joining the Democratic Party dlk Sep 2019 #12
lol ! stonecutter357 Sep 2019 #13
"It's his turn." LanternWaste Sep 2019 #14
Jacobin - the official gazette of the BS campaign nt BlueMississippi Sep 2019 #16
BS matters extremely PhoenixDem Sep 2019 #17
Joe Biden is on verge of advocating a tax on Wall St. Financial transactions ritapria Sep 2019 #18
Good point ritaria, it will be interesting to see how that plays out Uncle Joe Sep 2019 #19
If he does, it's not following the "lead" of Sanders..... George II Sep 2019 #21
Because breakfast and a wealth tax on Wall Street are even close to being the same, Uncle Joe Sep 2019 #26
Why is another candidate saying something about an issue that's been out there.... George II Sep 2019 #27
An "issue being out there" and being actively supported a major Presidential Candidate Uncle Joe Sep 2019 #28
taxing wall street transactions is nothing new. bernie is a follower, as are many, on this issue nt msongs Sep 2019 #29
I just found out about Form 8960--investment tax... TreasonousBastard Sep 2019 #32
Nah...nt SidDithers Sep 2019 #35
If you spell nah backward, it becomes Han Uncle Joe Sep 2019 #36
I think we now have a word to describe the reflexive push back on any Bernie thread. dgauss Sep 2019 #37
 

LincolnRossiter

(560 posts)
9. lol
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 11:49 AM
Sep 2019

Can't say Bernie's folks aren't committed. I respect that.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
4. Jacobin is ...
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 11:39 AM
Sep 2019

Jacobin is a democratic socialist quarterly magazine based in New York offering American leftist perspectives on politics, economics, and culture.

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes),
publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes.
Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/jacobin/

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

aidbo

(2,328 posts)
6. Yep, Jacobin is left of center.
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 11:44 AM
Sep 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
22. ...
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 12:18 PM
Sep 2019

"publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes.
Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy."

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

George II

(67,782 posts)
7. And of course they take their usual, gratuitous shot at Democrats:
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 11:46 AM
Sep 2019
In the long run, Democrats “suffer from not forthrightly making ideological arguments,” Grossmann argues; “partially as a result, [the] public maintains conservative predispositions.”
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

betsuni

(25,460 posts)
34. Everything is Democrats' fault.
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 06:59 PM
Sep 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Uncle Joe

(58,349 posts)
8. You omitted a critical information from your own link, was that deliberate?
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 11:46 AM
Sep 2019


(snip)

Overall, we rate Jacobin Magazine, Left Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that always favor the Democratic Socialist Left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information and a clean fact check record.

(snip)

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/jacobin/

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

George II

(67,782 posts)
10. The link in the OP is opinion, not reporting fact.
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 11:51 AM
Sep 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Uncle Joe

(58,349 posts)
15. Virtually everything put forward by the corporate media conglomerates in regards
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 12:02 PM
Sep 2019

to primary or Presidential election coverage is opinion.

Why should Jacobin's opinions be treated differently?

The question in one's mind should be are the opinions put forward by pundits or authors based on sound reasoning and/or supported by historical data.

I believe the author makes valid points, which are supported by political science studies and no one on this thread to point have been able to rebut.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

George II

(67,782 posts)
20. I was responding to this: "We also rate them High for factual reporting."
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 12:16 PM
Sep 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
24. ...
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 12:20 PM
Sep 2019
publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes.
Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Uncle Joe

(58,349 posts)
25. and again this specifically regarding Jacobin
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 12:34 PM
Sep 2019



snip)

Overall, we rate Jacobin Magazine, Left Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that always favor the Democratic Socialist Left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information and a clean fact check record.

(snip)

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/jacobin/





If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

qazplm135

(7,447 posts)
5. ah the old
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 11:44 AM
Sep 2019

everyone is secretly a leftist argument.

A time honored classic.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

beastie boy

(9,307 posts)
11. Bernie matters, and that is what worries me.
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 11:52 AM
Sep 2019

The last time around, 12% of Bernie supporters voted for Trump.

And it mattered. A lot.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Amimnoch

(4,558 posts)
23. Mmmm hmm. And going for round 2 of spoiling. -nt.
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 12:19 PM
Sep 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

dlk

(11,549 posts)
12. Bernie wants Democratic support without joining the Democratic Party
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 11:54 AM
Sep 2019

Like it or not, this hurts him.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
14. "It's his turn."
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 11:59 AM
Sep 2019

That's the back of the t-shirt.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

BlueMississippi

(776 posts)
16. Jacobin - the official gazette of the BS campaign nt
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 12:04 PM
Sep 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

PhoenixDem

(581 posts)
17. BS matters extremely
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 12:06 PM
Sep 2019

in Vermont as a senator.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

ritapria

(1,812 posts)
18. Joe Biden is on verge of advocating a tax on Wall St. Financial transactions
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 12:06 PM
Sep 2019

Following the lead of Bernard ?

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Uncle Joe

(58,349 posts)
19. Good point ritaria, it will be interesting to see how that plays out
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 12:09 PM
Sep 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

George II

(67,782 posts)
21. If he does, it's not following the "lead" of Sanders.....
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 12:18 PM
Sep 2019

....it's like saying "Sanders had breakfast at 7AM, Biden had breakfast at 8AM, following Sanders' lead."

Seems like everything anyone does or says is "following Sanders' lead."

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Uncle Joe

(58,349 posts)
26. Because breakfast and a wealth tax on Wall Street are even close to being the same,
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 12:37 PM
Sep 2019

is that your point?



"Seems like everything anyone does or says is "following Sanders' lead."




Why do you believe it seems that way?
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

George II

(67,782 posts)
27. Why is another candidate saying something about an issue that's been out there....
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 12:40 PM
Sep 2019

....for decades, if Biden does, "following Sanders' lead"?

I can turn that around into a question, too.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Uncle Joe

(58,349 posts)
28. An "issue being out there" and being actively supported a major Presidential Candidate
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 12:56 PM
Sep 2019

are two different things.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

msongs

(67,394 posts)
29. taxing wall street transactions is nothing new. bernie is a follower, as are many, on this issue nt
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 01:36 PM
Sep 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
32. I just found out about Form 8960--investment tax...
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 02:52 PM
Sep 2019

What constantly come up, and constantly get shot down, are trading taxes. A nickel, or a penny, per trade, or share, would tax a lot of the program trading-- which really has no economic reason to exist.

BTW, from the Wikipedia entry on "wealth taxes":

In 2004, a study by the Institut de l'enterprise investigated why several European countries were eliminating wealth taxes and made the following observations: 1. Wealth taxes contributed to capital drain, promoting the flight of capital as well as discouraging investors from coming in. 2. Wealth taxes had high management cost and relatively low returns. 3. Wealth taxes distorted resource allocation, particularly involving certain exemptions and unequal valuation of assets. In its summary, the institute found that the "wealth taxes were not as equitable as they appeared".[34]

In a 2011 study, the London School of Economics examined wealth taxes that were being considered by the Labour party in the United Kingdom between 1974 and 1976 but were ultimately abandoned. The findings of the study revealed that the British evaluated similar programs in other countries and determined that the Spanish wealth tax may have contributed to a banking crisis and the French wealth tax had been undergoing review by its government for being unpopular and overly complex. Furthermore, there were serious internal debates at the time between moderate Socialists and more leftist Marxist politicians as to the degree of public ownership of means of production. As efforts progressed, concerns were developing over the practicality and implementation of wealth taxes as well as worry that they would undermine confidence in the British economy. Eventually plans were dropped. Former British Chancellor Denis Healey concluded that attempting to implement wealth taxes was a mistake, "We had committed ourselves to a Wealth Tax: but in five years I found it impossible to draft one which would yield enough revenue to be worth the administrative cost and political hassle." The conclusion of the study stated that there were lingering questions, such as the impacts on personal saving and small business investment, consequences of capital flight, complexity of implementation, and ability to raise predicted revenues that must be adequately addressed before further consideration of wealth taxes.[35]In 2004, a study by the Institut de l'enterprise investigated why several European countries were eliminating wealth taxes and made the following observations: 1. Wealth taxes contributed to capital drain, promoting the flight of capital as well as discouraging investors from coming in. 2. Wealth taxes had high management cost and relatively low returns. 3. Wealth taxes distorted resource allocation, particularly involving certain exemptions and unequal valuation of assets. In its summary, the institute found that the "wealth taxes were not as equitable as they appeared".[34]




If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Uncle Joe

(58,349 posts)
36. If you spell nah backward, it becomes Han
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 08:58 PM
Sep 2019


Definition. Han is derived from the Chinese character 恨, which means resentment, hatred, or regret. According to the Translation Journal, "Han is frequently translated as sorrow, spite, rancor, regret, resentment or grief, among many other attempts to explain a concept that has no English equivalent."
Hanja: 恨
Hangul: 한
Han (cultural) - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Han_(cultural)



Joe
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

dgauss

(882 posts)
37. I think we now have a word to describe the reflexive push back on any Bernie thread.
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 10:23 PM
Sep 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Why Bernie Sanders Matter...