Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

emmaverybo

(8,144 posts)
Thu Feb 13, 2020, 03:56 PM Feb 2020

"Here's What Should Disqualify Michael Bloomberg New York's stop-and-frisk policy is just

one example of the former mayor’s lack of respect for civil liberties “

Michael Bloomberg says he is sorry.

On Sunday, amid preparations for a presidential bid, the billionaire appeared at a black church in Brooklyn and apologized for stop-and-frisk, a method of policing that he championed as mayor of New York City, a method he defended even as evidence emerged that it intruded on and inconvenienced millions of innocent people, humiliating many.

The police are stopping hundreds of thousands of law abiding New Yorkers every year, and the vast majority are black and Latino,” the New York Civil Liberties Union objected in 2012. “More than 4 million innocent New Yorkers were subjected to police stops and street interrogations from 2004 through 2011 ... Nearly nine out of 10 stopped-and-frisked New Yorkers have been completely innocent, according to the NYPD’s own reports.” Those stats undermine stop-and-frisk defenders, who claim to this day that the NYPD only targeted “those whom they reasonably believed to be involved in crimes and armed.” How reasonable can that ostensible belief have been when it was wrong roughly 90 percent of the time?

But Bloomberg kept claiming that the noble end of reducing gun murders justified the authoritarian means of forcing millions to undergo intrusive frisks on the street, in spite of the Fourth Amendment guarantee against unreasonable searches and seizures. He cited falling New York City murder rates to defend stop-and-frisk. As it turned out, the murder rate kept falling after Bloomberg’s successor, Mayor Bill de Blasio, ended stop-and-frisk.

Should Sunday’s apology make civil libertarians more favorably disposed toward a Bloomberg candidacy? No. Stop-and-frisk is not the only reason to worry about the former mayor’s paternalistic, coercive tendencies.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/11/bloomberg-civil-liberties/602239/

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Here's What Should Disqualify Michael Bloomberg New York's stop-and-frisk policy is just (Original Post) emmaverybo Feb 2020 OP
sad to say bloomie is not the only one with paternalistic coercive tendendcies nt msongs Feb 2020 #1
My absolute biggest fear of Bloomberg.. is that we are making it a billionaire game Peacetrain Feb 2020 #2
 

msongs

(67,406 posts)
1. sad to say bloomie is not the only one with paternalistic coercive tendendcies nt
Thu Feb 13, 2020, 03:58 PM
Feb 2020
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Peacetrain

(22,877 posts)
2. My absolute biggest fear of Bloomberg.. is that we are making it a billionaire game
Thu Feb 13, 2020, 03:59 PM
Feb 2020

for the President.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»"Here's What Should Disqu...