Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Texas Democrats are in a much stronger position than you think (Original Post) Quixote1818 Aug 23 OP
Please provide a summary when you post a video Bluetus Aug 24 #1
That was helpful, bluetus NJCher Aug 24 #2
This guy is saying the same thing Bluetus Aug 24 #5
Nothing on DU says to post a summary and many of us post from our phones. I'm not going to write out a book Quixote1818 Aug 24 #3
It is a matter of common courtesy and respect for others' time. Bluetus Aug 24 #4

Bluetus

(1,572 posts)
1. Please provide a summary when you post a video
Sun Aug 24, 2025, 12:24 AM
Aug 24

Last edited Sun Aug 24, 2025, 09:52 AM - Edit history (1)

I listened to about a minute of this thing, and it seems like this guy spends 13 minutes talking about 5 districts. Well, OK, but that doesn't deserve 13 minutes. And it ignores a fundamental axiom of gerrymandering.

Repeat after me:

When districts are already heavily gerrymandered, any attempt to gerrymander further, necessarily means that the cheaters weaken their position in "solid" districts.


This is because Gerrymandering means trying to squeeze more of the opponents' votes into a smaller number of sacrificial districts. When districts are already gerrymandered, it is quite difficult to squeeze them tighter, and by trying to create more districts for yourself, you are lowering your margin of error. In the ideal world, you would like to create a minimum number of 90% Dem districts and a maximum number of 60% GOP districts.

90% districts almost never happen, so they might have to target 55% districts for GOP candidates. In a normal election, that might work. But this could be a reactionary election that is hard on GOP incumbents, especially if inflation continues at its current level and we head into stagflation. In that case, with good candidates in "GOP districts" it might be possible to win some of those "safe" GOP districts, in addition to the 5 this video talks about. I hope people aren't looking only at those 5.

Bluetus

(1,572 posts)
5. This guy is saying the same thing
Sun Aug 24, 2025, 01:12 PM
Aug 24

in a bit more depth. In his case, he seems to be writing off the 5 targeted districts (which I don't think we should), but says there are 10 other districts that now would be in play if we can run good candidates with good campaigns.

Quixote1818

(31,075 posts)
3. Nothing on DU says to post a summary and many of us post from our phones. I'm not going to write out a book
Sun Aug 24, 2025, 10:32 AM
Aug 24

pecking at my phone because someone is too lazy to watch a few minutes of a video.

Bluetus

(1,572 posts)
4. It is a matter of common courtesy and respect for others' time.
Sun Aug 24, 2025, 01:07 PM
Aug 24

and your phone should allow you to dictate a few sentences without having to type anything.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Liberal YouTubers»Texas Democrats are in a ...