HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » JHB » Journal
Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 35 Next »


Profile Information

Gender: Do not display
Current location: Somewhere in the NYC metropolitan statistical area
Member since: 2001
Number of posts: 36,113

Journal Archives



Dammit, champaign cork! Cooperate!

on edit: Whew! Moment-spoiling crisis averted.

I don't think they're going to be able to afford a place on the Black Sea...

...but I'm sure Vlad will let them set up shop in a suitable location.

(Severny Island, above the Arctic Circle. Site of the biggest bomb in human history. It doesn't get more suitable for a Trump than that.)

HRC: Today, domestic terrorists attacked a foundation of our democracy


Hillary Clinton
Today, domestic terrorists attacked a foundation of our democracy: the peaceful transfer of power following free elections.

We must reestablish the rule of law and hold them accountable.

Democracy is fragile. Our leaders must live up to their responsibility to protect it.

You might want to check out this Twitter thread by a new DNC member

His observation of how things work and what the DNC can and can't do.

Unspooled for DU convenience


David Atkins

So...as a newly elected DNC member, I'd like to provide some insight on "the DNC" to folks who like to complain about "the DNC" and such.

Because "the DNC" doesn't work how most folks who talk about it think it does. It's both better--and far worse--than you think.

First off, "the DNC" doesn't work like a major corporation or government apparatus. It doesn't have branches or committees or sprawling structures of employees who answer to higher-ups. It doesn't have a board of directors making decisions every month. None of that. /2

The Democratic Party is made up of thousands of loosely affiliated groups connected by charters. To simplify, it mostly works like this: local clubs > county committees > state parties > national orgs.

These are all legally separate entities with wildly separate cultures. /3

To add to that, there are multiple national orgs! The DNC is the *weakest* of those orgs. It pales in comparison to the much more powerful and influential DCCC (elects House members) and DSCC (elects Senators), plus the DGA (governors) and DLCC (legislatures.) /4

In reality, the DNC doesn't actually *do* much of anything in most non-presidential years! It meets once a year. It has some window dressing councils and caucuses. It passes a few resolutions.

And the elected membership has basically NO REAL ROLE OR DIRECT INPUT. /5
Elected DNC members don't even have each other's contact info! There are few mechanisms to even provide input or request changes. Everything is opaque. And even if you could, there's not much the DNC actually *does*. The biggest change would be making the DNC *do* things. /6

Far from being this super powerful organization controlling everything, the DNC actually does very little and controls nothing outside of presidential years, at which point it serves as a locus for consultants to direct state primary structures and help the nominee. /7

The *real* power in the Democratic Party lies in the DCCC and DSCC, which work w/ State Party chairs to help with congressional races.

Some states are more democratic & open than others (CA is pretty good!), but even in CA most actual power is wielded unitarily by the Chair. /8

The most truly small-D "democratic" work happens at the County Committee level, where club presidents and local elected committee members recruit, endorse and organize for local "non-partisan" races. Above that? It's almost *entirely* consultant driven in a tight circle. /9

The sad reality is that it would be *better* if the DNC actually ran like its critics think it did: a big mega-conglomerate machine. It's not.

It's actually a money firehose run by shoestring staff, run entirely a handful of consultants and appointed fundraising honchos. /10

Most "DNC members" have no capacity to organize either within the DNC, and have no serious directives. We are supposed to help raise money and amplify the messaging from on high--which, again, is directed by a tiny crew of unelected consultants and appointeds. /11

The DCCC and DSCC are even more inaccessible. The DNC at least has the window dressing of high-level activists. The DCCC and DSCC are directly run by the Congressional Members themselves. There is no pathway to involvement.

And they functionally dictate to state parties. /12

The problems with doing things this way are obvious:
1) self-dealing by consultants
2) unwillingness to change
3) lack of personnel capacity to change!
4) fear of losing a tightly held circle of power
5) groupthink and path dependency
6) inability to confront new ideas

The biggest issue is that assumption that the best primary candidate is the one who can raise the most money. We know this isn't true! We outraise GOPs 3-1 but lose.

But it's hard to teach old dogs new tricks--especially when they're paid consultants who like the money! /14

There is no ability for activists closer to the ground to tell DCCC, DSCC or DNC when they're being tone-deaf to local concerns. No ability to influence decisions. And DCCC/DSCC/DNC continue to meddle in primaries.

In part because there's no organizational structure for it! /15

It would ironically be better if the Dem Party *did* run like a big corporation. Big corporations get input from local division leaders who report up the chain and influence decision-making! Successful local leaders get promoted!

No such organizational capacity exists. /16

So you get a bunch of extremely talented local activists who help win elections, promote progressive values, and get elected to positions that functionally serve as window dressing for the real power players--and get paid nothing!!

Those folks usually burn out. /17

Occasionally they get connected and get a plum gig, in exchange for playing the game and staying quiet. But then the only people who can make a living in the game are the careerists and brown-nosers.

Everyone else burns out or works doing what they can unpaid for decades./18

For instance, in California in the entire Dem Party structure the only people who get paid are the State Chair and staff. Plus consultants and whatever affiliate orgs do.

No one else makes a dime. Not the state Exec Board. Not the Regional Directors. Not the County Chairs. /19

So you have national orgs raking in literally billions of dollars, working with shoestring staff most of the time, ramping up armies of part-time and mostly volunteer workers in election season, directed by unelected consultants making big bank. That's it. /20

For everyone with a conspiracy theory about "the DNC" this or that, please note that these organizations can barely manage a meeting--if they keep a lid on all the members. They couldn't organize a conspiracy if their lives depended on it. /21

And there are legions of talented activists with nowhere to go and nothing to do but organize however they can in their free time, unpaid, usually at the local level.

If they want to work in politics they have to pay the toll. And usually OUTSIDE of the party apparatus! /22

In short, if you want this to improve, ironically the political parties need to actually be bigger, more consolidated, more powerful, have more permanent employees and be more directly accountable.

Right now it's the worst of both worlds: too much $, too little structure. /23

And that doesn't even get into culture. For instance, both Biden and Obama have brands that are broadly "anti-partisan." Work with anything, "one america" and such.

But they also appoint and control the DNC, an explicitly partisan organization! This leads to problems. /24

The DNC needs to be bigger, more powerful, more active year-round, and much more explicitly partisan and strategic. It needs to meddle less in primaries. And it needs to have much more opportunity for talented activists to help make decisions.

Same goes for DCCC/DSCC. /end

Oh...and I should mention: doing things this way incentivizes pure careerism, which in turn incentivizes gerontocracy.

It is not accident the average age of a dem party leader is over 70 years old--20 years older than for the GOP.

Even though we're the party favored by youth.

Original beginning tweet:

Has Trump offered to pay Raffensperger...

Has @realDonaldTrump offered to pay Raffensperger $130K to keep his mouth shut yet?

He passed in 2001, and he did take a swipe at Trump

This is from 1999, when Trump was dabbling with a candidacy in Ross Perot's Reform Party.

According to editorial cartoonist Herb Block, better known as Herblock, the stupidest tea party was when, in October 1999, presidential candidate Patrick Buchanan switched from the Republican Party to the Reform Party, creating divisiveness within the emerging third party as his political platform differed markedly from that of founder Ross Perot. In the meantime, real estate magnate Donald Trump had formally established his Reform Party candidacy. Trump was favored as the “Stop Buchanan” candidate, but in February 2000, he withdrew from the race. In August 2000, Patrick Buchanan accepted the presidential nomination from one wing of a decidedly split Reform Party. For Herb Block, the situation evoked one of Sir John Tenniel’s famous illustrations for Lewis Carroll’s “Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland.”


If Trump tries to stay in the WH past noon 1/20, there's a simple way to get him to leave quietly...

Remember, after noon, WH workers answer to the incoming administration. No need for dragging him out or anything.

Have the kitchen start making mashed potatoes. Lots and lots of mashed potatoes. Put in carry-out orders to restaurants to add capacity.

Scrounge up every medium-sized bowl in the WH inventory that isn't valuable on its own. Start a drive a week or two beforehand to borrow/rent bowls from DC residents and restaurants.

Show him a sea of bowls of mashed potatoes that will be dumped on his head until he leaves. Dozens, hundreds of them.

If he thinks it's a bluff, start following through. Dump a bowl on his head and everybody laugh. Then dump another bowl and repeat. And repeat. And repeat.

He'll leave. Either when faced with it, or after the first with the second looming, and all those others behind it. Meekly, and dodging attention as hard as he can manage.

Even better if they can dredge up someone who can do a passable Fred Trump impression.

This very topic came up back in May. I expanded on it at the time...

...because I was a comics nerd back when it came out in 1984 (still have it in a box somewhere). It was one of the things that inspired me to not just give up our symbols to them. There can be plenty of problems, but there is good stuff near and dear to peoples' hearts, so don't let the bastards take them and use them as their toys.


That third panel is from 1984's What If #44, which echos so much today
The premise was "What If Captain America were revived today?" ("today" being 1984).

It has two different Caps being revived: First, the 1950's replacement Cap, who's a McCarthyite Bircher-in-all-but-name, who'd been created to get back that ol' WW2-Cap "living symbol of patriotism" spirit during the crusade against the commies. At some point in the '50s he became inconvenient and was put in some sort of suspended animation. Some time in the 70s he was released by a "patriotic citizen", who was a janitor at the secret facility where he was being kept on ice. Once again posing as WW2 Cap, he becomes a magnet for RW politicians and other zealots.

Including one who wants to put severe restrictions on immigrants, get tough with unruly minorities, and reinvigorate "the real America". With fake-Cap's backing he wins in a landslide. Fake-Cap endorses militias, the "Sentinels of Liberty", to confront protesters. At one such protest, fake-Cap's higher-level backers have a sniper shoot him so it can be blamed on the protesters and justify a crackdown, Reichstag-Fire-style.

Fake-Cap survived (believing it was the protesters who shot him), and went on to help his backers consolidate power under -- I kid you not -- the America First Party. The Sentinels of Liberty are elevated to practically an internal occupation army. They build walls to seal off minorities from the rest of the country, most notable the Harlem Wall. An Emergency Information Freedoms Act is passed to restrict the press. To maintain the appearance of following the 1st Amendment, some dissent (within limits) is allowed. One such dissident is the New York Daily Bugle's cantankerous and idiosyncratic editor/publisher, J. Jonah Jameson.

This is the environment in which WW2 Cap, Steve Rogers, is found in the ice and revived by a submarine crew (submarine duty being the main "See? We're not discriminating. We accept the good ones." job for minorities and Jews in the Navy).

The old-timer sub skipper is able to identify this Cap as the real one, and when they get back to port he sneaks Cap to the Resistance, led by Jameson, Nick Fury, Sam Wilson (who's not The Falcon here, but instead leads "the Black Cadres," intentionally modeled after the Black Panther Party), and Spider-Man.

I give the above rundown to set the stage for the couple of pages below. Clipping panels here and there don't do them justice.

The Resistance strikes back at the America First Party's first national convention in Madison Square Garden. With all the restrictions, its leader is a veritable shoe-in to win the election, and once he's in place he'll consolidate further and make himself the king of America.

First, however, the Resistance upstages the festivities...

Over the next several pages Cap & fake-Cap fight, and other Resistance members take out the Sentinels in the room and keep the TV cameras running. Being the real deal, Cap beats the fake. The crowd reacts, and Cap says his piece.

End scene.

The resolution is wildly simplistic, sure, but they had to wrap it up on a high note.

"TV" is a Secret Service code word...

Go to Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 35 Next »