white backlash politics at the heart of Trumpism

[Demovictory9]

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/7/24/17603190/trump-evangelicals-race-status-threat

This conversation explains a vital reason why Trump is so popular on the right
“It’s about the survival of the Christian nation,” said one woman — expressing the white backlash politics at the heart of Trumpism.


https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/ZW6veiezEU0NEt8nxosPSpGsYpw=/0x0:1601x1601/920x0/filters:focal(0x0:1601x1601):format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/10586035/minority_racial_attitudes_chart.jpg

Craig and Robinson dubbed this effect “group-status threat”: When whites felt like their control over society was slipping, they were more likely to embrace anti-minority ideas and support policies that might slow the rate of demographic change (like immigration restrictionism). When whites feel like the privileged status of their group in society is threatened, they will want to do something to preserve it.

This study wasn’t a one-off: As my colleague Brian Resnick documents, study after study has confirmed that white status threat is a major force driving white Americans to the right on issues of race and tolerance. And since the Republican Party has become overwhelmingly white, this has an effect on the party as a whole. A July poll found that 50 percent of Republicans felt that “increased racial diversity” had a negative impact on the United States, while only 43 percent thought the effect was positive.

The University of Maryland’s Janelle Wong looked at the political attitudes of white evangelicals like Sheila and found that status threat is the key reason why they, as a group, have been so overwhelmingly supportive of Trump.

“Rank-and-file white evangelicals have the most negative attitudes toward immigrants of all U.S. religious groups,” Wong writes at the Monkey Cage. “Their conservative reaction to demographic change is at the heart of their political agenda.”

This is how you make sense of the shocking, seemingly un-Christian lack of charity toward the vulnerable that you see in the conversation between Sheila and Linda.