Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Avenatti: I have been practicing law for nearly 20 years. Never before have I seen a defendant... [View all]bitterross
(4,066 posts)5. While the agreement may go away, Defamation should not.
Sure, they may be able to stop depositions on the agreement if they nullify the agreement. Then the case would probably be "moot."
I'm not a lawyer here so do not feel I am correct. I'm just really making an educated guess.
My thought is, though, even if the agreement is no longer in place the claims of defamation are still valid claims. Daniels was "injured" by the defendants' comments and actions. That means Avanatti should still be able to depose them about their statements about her and their motives behind those statements.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Avenatti: I have been practicing law for nearly 20 years. Never before have I seen a defendant... [View all]
steve2470
Sep 2018
OP
Exactly, screwing over others is his whole ethos- remember him trying to screw the wives of people
bettyellen
Sep 2018
#26
Yet I think she should or could win and get 5$ damages and it's still a win.
bettyellen
Sep 2018
#27
Nothing that a few roubles can't assuage. Expect to see more and more not running,
erronis
Sep 2018
#21