General Discussion

former9thward

(33,424 posts)

16. You have not answered the question.

Sat Sep 8, 2018, 10:56 PM

Sep 2018

Your are on the jury. What dollar amount do you assign to her honesty? (Knowing of course, her honesty or lack of, in other aspects of her life would be presented in court).

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Avenatti: I have been practicing law for nearly 20 years. Never before have I seen a defendant... [View all] steve2470 Sep 2018 OP

I don't get it... SayItLoud Sep 2018 #1

I think it has to do with contract law marylandblue Sep 2018 #2

$130,000 should be pocket change to a "so called" Billionaire.. HipChick Sep 2018 #3

He's notoriously cheap, he's stiffed contractors for much less. marylandblue Sep 2018 #4

i've heard tRumps corporate credit rating is way down in the stink weeds. nt elmac Sep 2018 #7

being cheap would be sane. I think he did it because ginnyinWI Sep 2018 #25

Exactly, screwing over others is his whole ethos- remember him trying to screw the wives of people bettyellen Sep 2018 #26

"So-Called" Le Grand Pronounceur Sep 2018 #12

"So-called" and self-styled." calimary Sep 2018 #23

Yep he's owes hundreds of millions to the russians onetexan Sep 2018 #24

While the agreement may go away, Defamation should not. bitterross Sep 2018 #5

What would you estimate her economic loss to have been? jberryhill Sep 2018 #9

Economic loss is not the only factor. Character is a factor. bitterross Sep 2018 #10

And what would that number work out to. jberryhill Sep 2018 #11

Why don't you put a price on honesty? bitterross Sep 2018 #14

You have not answered the question. former9thward Sep 2018 #16

Again jberryhill Sep 2018 #20

Yet I think she should or could win and get 5$ damages and it's still a win. bettyellen Sep 2018 #27

Damages MooDrew Sep 2018 #31

Agreed empedocles Sep 2018 #32

Welcome to DU. A thoughtful and interesting first post. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2018 #35

Thank You MooDrew Sep 2018 #38

How do you defame a porn star? Say she's moral? 7962 Sep 2018 #33

Wow, that's rude, misogynistic and uncalled for. bitterross Sep 2018 #34

Both men and women do porn. Ragging on a porn star is hardly sexist. 7962 Sep 2018 #37

The case isn't based on her morality. MooDrew Sep 2018 #40

But if you go that route, then others could make the same defamatory claim 7962 Sep 2018 #41

Sigh MooDrew Sep 2018 #46

Using the the term "ragging" certainly is. bitterross Sep 2018 #42

No, you say she is... reACTIONary Sep 2018 #47

It doesn't matter if Cohen was reimbursed by Trump jberryhill Sep 2018 #8

These civil lawsuit depositions are also a so-called "perjury trap" RockRaven Sep 2018 #6

I don't think he's all that frightened. nini Sep 2018 #13

All he has left of the cattle is bullshit world wide wally Sep 2018 #15

Meanwhile in that thread.... yuiyoshida Sep 2018 #17

Good for you...nice picture...... onecent Sep 2018 #22

That kinda looks like an inflamed asshole...... nt 7962 Sep 2018 #39

Right on both yuiyoshida Sep 2018 #44

This message was self-deleted by its author yuiyoshida Sep 2018 #45

I prefer to think of Shithole as Liberalagogo Sep 2018 #18

HAHA!! Good one... AZ8theist Sep 2018 #29

It must be frustrating for Republicans right now because bucolic_frolic Sep 2018 #19

Nothing that a few roubles can't assuage. Expect to see more and more not running, erronis Sep 2018 #21

"all hat, no cattle" heaven05 Sep 2018 #28

All Ass-hat and no cattle. LakeArenal Sep 2018 #30

Has anyone explained how Cohen AND Trump would still be co-operating over this ? Doesn't this strike OnDoutside Sep 2018 #36

Going to be a fun primary season oberliner Sep 2018 #43