Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: California is in danger of losing a House seat after adding 2.3 million people [View all]Totally Tunsie
(11,146 posts)31. It's highly likely, with Arizona benefitting from our loss.
When you have only 2 Reps to begin with, losing one is huge. We will become the eighth state to have only 1 Rep in the House.
https://www.wpri.com/politics/ri-will-lose-a-us-house-seat-to-arizona-after-2020-study-finds/1668551164
Arizona is set to snag one of Rhode Island's two U.S. House seats after the 2020 Census, leaving Rhode Island with just one representative in the chamber for the first time since George Washington was president, according to an analysis of newly released population data.
In fact, a bill is being proposed to lure out-of-staters to move to RI before the 2020 census to meet population requirements for retaining the second seat.
https://www.providencejournal.com/news/20181220/with-ri-on-brink-of-losing-house-seat-legislator-plans-to-revisit-paying-people-to-move-here
As originally proposed by Tobon, people currently living in any state in the country would be eligible for the [$10,000] tax credit as long as they bring a family of at least three and have a household income that exceeds $100,000 per year. More specifically, Tobon said, he hoped to take advantage of middle-class professionals being priced out of Greater Boston by soaring housing costs.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

California is in danger of losing a House seat after adding 2.3 million people [View all]
Celerity
Dec 2018
OP
Yes, and one of the ways to gauge the size of the increase in the number of House members is called
Celerity
Dec 2018
#8
I'm just saying if you want to make congress truly representative, you must deep six the Senate
Major Nikon
Dec 2018
#13
you still need both chambers to pass laws, and the Senate doesn't change in size, so that stays the
Celerity
Dec 2018
#15
Actually I do have a fix for the Senate. It is ultra radical and hard to do though.
Celerity
Dec 2018
#14
Why cap the total, and adjust the ratio ? Could easily fix the ratio at say, 1 Rep:1,000,000 voters
eppur_se_muova
Dec 2018
#4
One per million is the opposite direction. That would reduce House size to only 330 or so.
Celerity
Dec 2018
#9
Rhode Island is also facing the same fate, pitting our two solid Dem Reps,
Totally Tunsie
Dec 2018
#25