Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
4. That's the point... they can be forced to
Thu Aug 30, 2012, 05:14 AM
Aug 2012

They don't want to ask the question. It is toxic to them.

But if an official premise of the Obama campaign was that Romney lacks the character to be president because he lies constantly then the MSM has no choice but examine that premise.

They can call it anything they want, as long as they are talking about whether somebody who does it (whatever "it" is called) is disqualified for high office.

It's win-win. When they split the difference is Mitt only halfway morally disqualified to be President?

But the MSM will never take up the question on their own. They will note every day, in passing, that nothing Mitt says is true but they will not consider the implications of that unless the Obama campaign makes a claim.

Then that claim of the decisive significance of lying all the time must be examined.

And that's a great discussion to have. Do Romney's lies rise to the level of moral dysfunction, or is he an okay guy who merely happens to never tell the truth about anything?

Win-win.

The MSM has painted themselves into a corner, if we push the issue. They have all said that Romney lies all the time, but think they can get away with playing that off as no big deal. So make it a big deal.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Read Matt Taibbi's article in the Rolling Stone it's all right there: the LIES about debt & deficits patrice Aug 2012 #1
Shameless KICK. Amonester Aug 2012 #14
This is really good stuff cthulu woolldog Aug 2012 #2
You mean they don't already study every word we write here? cthulu2016 Aug 2012 #11
For that to work the M$M would have to actually use the "L" word.. Fumesucker Aug 2012 #3
That's the point... they can be forced to cthulu2016 Aug 2012 #4
The "swing voters" are the ones you have to reach.. Fumesucker Aug 2012 #5
Your proposal is a good one. Tennessee Gal Aug 2012 #6
The specifics of the lies themselves are well documented cthulu2016 Aug 2012 #7
I say tie the lies to COMPETENCY not integrity cause swing voters think lyin is part of politics... uponit7771 Aug 2012 #8
Yes, they do assume both sides do it. That is a cthulu2016 Aug 2012 #10
...hmmm, I see...but that takes a blitz, a well organized 2 week long subject change and the DNC uponit7771 Aug 2012 #15
It may not require a blitz. cthulu2016 Aug 2012 #20
Going to give you a ton of credit for coming up with a good solution... nc4bo Aug 2012 #9
Thank you, cthulu2016 Aug 2012 #12
cthulu2017 nc4bo Aug 2012 #13
+1 uponit7771 Aug 2012 #16
How to bumber sticker the response is key also, too much explaining about Medicare for instance uponit7771 Aug 2012 #17
Yes. The particular facts do not matter except insofar as cthulu2016 Aug 2012 #19
Is there enough time to do to him and Lyin' Paul Ryan what republicans did to Al Gore? sadbear Aug 2012 #18
Good grok. reflection Aug 2012 #21
Glad somebody else still uses "grok" cthulu2016 Aug 2012 #27
There are a few people left who use it... yes, Heinlein was a Randian pud indeed reflection Aug 2012 #30
UPDATE—Why this Matters: cthulu2016 Aug 2012 #22
Trying to turn his biggest weakness into a strength. sadbear Aug 2012 #23
Visa-versa cthulu2016 Aug 2012 #24
I think social media is the way to get this message out gollygee Aug 2012 #25
K&R nt avebury Aug 2012 #26
Kick! nt nc4bo Aug 2012 #28
k&r... spanone Aug 2012 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There IS a way to derail ...»Reply #4