Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Another cryptic title with little information, elocs Sep 2019 #1
"Media Bias" report on this site doesn't look too good. NCLefty Sep 2019 #50
The article is inaccurate Phoenix61 Sep 2019 #2
No. You are ignoring them. triron Sep 2019 #4
Yeah, that makes sense: they went to all the trouble to hack into our systems, risked discovery and Atticus Sep 2019 #21
This operation likely cost a fortune, as well. Cracklin Charlie Sep 2019 #38
Of course they did. I have known this for at least 2 years. triron Sep 2019 #3
Over to you, cilla4progress Sep 2019 #5
President broke law with Cohen to steal election sharedvalues Sep 2019 #6
Trump A Traitor trueblue2007 Sep 2019 #13
Nope. Once again ... Speculation. stopdiggin Sep 2019 #7
and from the same "source" 2 days ago stopdiggin Sep 2019 #10
Unnnn, the article is pretty clear that hackers altered data that would affect votes in the end and uponit7771 Sep 2019 #22
I said the "Committee" didn't reach such a conclusion stopdiggin Sep 2019 #25
👍🏼 uponit7771 Sep 2019 #29
What about inaccurate counts? imaginary girl Sep 2019 #8
Nobody disputes that voter registration systems were accessed... brooklynite Sep 2019 #9
THANKS. again. stopdiggin Sep 2019 #11
brooklynite, I am saidsimplesimon Sep 2019 #12
You're welcome to your opinion... brooklynite Sep 2019 #14
That's not true. rockfordfile Sep 2019 #17
Name them... brooklynite Sep 2019 #18
No way in hell would the U.S government admit to Russia kicking their butts rockfordfile Sep 2019 #16
So you're coming up with a conspiracy theory to support a conspiracy theory... brooklynite Sep 2019 #19
many here are not claiming vote flipping, many are claiming registration shaving which it looks uponit7771 Sep 2019 #23
and election officials wouldn't have been able to pick up on this? stopdiggin Sep 2019 #33
Good point, it would depend on the county and is there a reporting method for it. There's no uponit7771 Sep 2019 #45
almost every state has poll watchers stopdiggin Sep 2019 #47
Doesn't require 'masses' of people being turned away. Their provisional ballots triron Sep 2019 #48
and the poll watchers have no idea that provisional ballots aren't showing up anywhere? stopdiggin Sep 2019 #52
Nope, it was on Rachael one evening I WISH I had recorded it as proof. The provisional ballots uponit7771 Sep 2019 #53
wrong stopdiggin Sep 2019 #58
"...and counted after verification..." again ... someone has to verify them and no one keeps count uponit7771 Sep 2019 #62
provisional ballots are NOT great in number, that's the point stopdiggin Sep 2019 #66
Can an illegitimate lsewpershad Sep 2019 #15
Really? hughee99 Sep 2019 #20
You don't have the rig the count just shave the registration state wide. Seeing how wide open GA uponit7771 Sep 2019 #24
So in Georgia, you'd have more than 200k people who tried to vote only to find they were no longer hughee99 Sep 2019 #26
Hmmm, they can get a baseline for provisional ballots per county then see if there were anomalies uponit7771 Sep 2019 #30
Would like to see a citation for that. There were reports of a few people, but Hoyt Sep 2019 #34
My point is, Trump won by 200k votes. For the voter rolls to have been hacked resulting in a Trump hughee99 Sep 2019 #35
My apologies.. Read too quickly after a stiff bourbon. Agree completely. Hoyt Sep 2019 #36
If multiple pathways are taken to change vote tallies this is an incomplete triron Sep 2019 #49
Is there any proof ANY path was taken to change vote tallies? hughee99 Sep 2019 #57
Statewide? Not at all, also was there a call out for them post election? No ... no one gave a damn uponit7771 Sep 2019 #54
Are you suggesting that there were 200k people in GA hughee99 Sep 2019 #56
The Diebold touchscreen machines are delisen Sep 2019 #60
She story was supposed to be presenting some evidence hughee99 Sep 2019 #69
This is a major issue in Georgia delisen Sep 2019 #71
It takes very little effort to rig the vote in Georgia. delisen Sep 2019 #28
My post wasn't actually my own words. It was a statement from someone I trust hughee99 Sep 2019 #32
That will change for 2020 election. A new system, with paper trail, has been purchased. Hoyt Sep 2019 #46
The new system has problems; lawsuit filed delisen Sep 2019 #59
trump "won" in mich by less than 11,000 votes questionseverything Sep 2019 #27
which the Russians had nothing to do with stopdiggin Sep 2019 #37
Got any reports of significant number of voters being turned away at polls? Hoyt Sep 2019 #31
I asked this exact same question the other day... Takket Sep 2019 #39
Agree. I've been purged several times when I moved, didn't vote there, but Hoyt Sep 2019 #43
K&R Blue Owl Sep 2019 #40
Yes! I've been saying this since the day after the election. Exit Polls ElementaryPenguin Sep 2019 #41
And, of course, Mueller said THEY DID NOT EVEN LOOK AT THIS... ElementaryPenguin Sep 2019 #42
A lot of ignorant white wing racists -- trump voters, in other words -- try to hide it. Hoyt Sep 2019 #44
And yet Hillary didn't claim the votes were flipped... brooklynite Sep 2019 #64
It likely to be stolen again next year. Kablooie Sep 2019 #51
+1, Red Don effectively called off the 2020 election when he said openly he'd cheat by welcoming aid uponit7771 Sep 2019 #55
Exactly-altho Putin may decide to dump Trump delisen Sep 2019 #61
"We're DOOMED!!!" brooklynite Sep 2019 #63
No, it wasn't 'stolen'. I wish it was. Captain Stern Sep 2019 #65
Captain, you have NO WAY of knowing that there is "no evidence... ElementaryPenguin Sep 2019 #67
Fair enough....I have no way of knowing that evidence doesn't exist. Captain Stern Sep 2019 #68
So, as with religious evangelicals it's our job to prove it DIDN'T happen... brooklynite Sep 2019 #70
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What I and some others he...»Reply #15