Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(26,744 posts)
94. So?
Wed Sep 18, 2019, 03:45 PM
Sep 2019

Last edited Wed Sep 18, 2019, 04:34 PM - Edit history (1)

Let's clear something up that has not changed. Impeachment is a political process. Not a criminal process.

The classic quote is "The only honest answer is that an impeachable offense is whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history"

By extension... it isn't an impeachable offense if the majority of members in the House can't agree that it is.



Makes you wonder Bettie Sep 2019 #1
+1 mysteryowl Sep 2019 #43
Attacks on Pelosi...that's novel. LexVegas Sep 2019 #2
I didn't Newest Reality Sep 2019 #3
A "a statement or inducement to act" doesn't deny the inherent potential of an attack as well. LanternWaste Sep 2019 #8
I see. Newest Reality Sep 2019 #10
I'm just gobsmacked at anyone imagining ordering the current Hortensis Sep 2019 #18
Yes, get with the fucking game. This slow-walk, demure, tentative, weak shuffle is an ugly, Magoo48 Sep 2019 #60
I have been waiting for the intelligence gldstwmn Sep 2019 #88
Yikes this has zero to do with all she does and that she is Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2019 #111
+1000! mcar Sep 2019 #64
No words JustAnotherGen Sep 2019 #79
The imperative "get with the program" implies that she's out of sync or unaware... NurseJackie Sep 2019 #20
you got that right, Nurse! And the OP had spelling errors Jeffersons Ghost Sep 2019 #47
Yea you're late to the correction party TheSocialDem Sep 2019 #50
Post removed Post removed Sep 2019 #67
Post removed Post removed Sep 2019 #90
Your cool just being obstructed at every turn? TheSocialDem Sep 2019 #4
One of the articles of impeachment against Nixon was for contempt of Congress Poiuyt Sep 2019 #30
What magic words will open these floodgates of information? ehrnst Sep 2019 #100
We can provide constructive criticism. This meme Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2019 #6
I agree. H2O Man Sep 2019 #31
The Biden and Pelosi supporters don't want to hear anything negative, even if its true Perseus Sep 2019 #44
I notice you keep lumping the Biden and Pelosi supporters together. StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #54
Um, Pelosi supporter here. calimary Sep 2019 #63
Thank you. Frankly, I am sick and tired of being lectured here for months re "attacking" Pelosi Nevermypresident Sep 2019 #69
I Agree brutus smith Sep 2019 #46
I see. We should just blindly, unquestionably gldstwmn Sep 2019 #86
On DU, at least. lindysalsagal Sep 2019 #104
Yup Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2019 #112
I smell borscht. nt JustABozoOnThisBus Sep 2019 #97
Yup. 2020 Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2019 #113
2nd that. triron Sep 2019 #5
Already the seeds being sown that holding Lew Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2019 #7
I hope he winds up in prison over gldstwmn Sep 2019 #92
For what?!?! What would that do that's not just topical? thx in advance uponit7771 Sep 2019 #9
It carries legal implications that TheSocialDem Sep 2019 #11
And the republicans know it and aren't afraid to flaunt it. triron Sep 2019 #12
Like what legal implications? BTW ... uponit7771 Sep 2019 #13
Why not go there though? Why not make the official statement TheSocialDem Sep 2019 #14
They did go there, in the official subpoana they say its also for the sake of impeachment ... uponit7771 Sep 2019 #16
because there are clearly qazplm135 Sep 2019 #24
Frankly I'm not certain of that at this point. gldstwmn Sep 2019 #93
well I am qazplm135 Sep 2019 #98
The judiciary is using the fuzziness of our official TheSocialDem Sep 2019 #15
No they're not, there's nothing about the impeachment process that says the judiciary has to hurry u uponit7771 Sep 2019 #17
Jail people gor contempt of Congress? Lol grantcart Sep 2019 #37
So why are we holding hearings if we can't do anything? brutus smith Sep 2019 #48
Holdingn hearings is doing something grantcart Sep 2019 #51
lewie admitted yesterday that he lied under oath not_the_one Sep 2019 #68
Lying under oath is not the same as perjury grantcart Sep 2019 #107
Congress doesn't have the authority to charge and arrest people for perjury StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #116
Who prosecutes on perjury? gldstwmn Sep 2019 #96
The fact that YOU don't know it doesn't mean it hasn't already been figured out by the people StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #103
Federal grand jury would indict but lying under oath isn't inherently perjury grantcart Sep 2019 #108
Perjury before Congress is a federal offence FBaggins Sep 2019 #99
Her argument is that "we need to bring the American people along with us". meadowlander Sep 2019 #85
The word impeachment has been thrown around ad nausea, local ... network and cable. Damn uponit7771 Sep 2019 #95
But Pelosi hasn't said it StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #117
Patience Wednesdays Sep 2019 #19
thanks,, i was going to say that,, but then... pangaia Sep 2019 #23
A medical practitioner including all the support staff right down to the janitors call them patients usaf-vet Sep 2019 #33
Recommended. H2O Man Sep 2019 #21
Nancy is Moving in the Right Direction dlk Sep 2019 #22
Bravo! bucolic_frolic Sep 2019 #27
:) dlk Sep 2019 #28
THIS Auggie Sep 2019 #40
Yes, We Can't Let Our Eagerness to be Rid of Trump and all of His Corrupted Cronies Force Any Errors dlk Sep 2019 #52
Just because he does more impeachable stuff TheSocialDem Sep 2019 #61
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Sep 2019 #53
This TheSocialDem Sep 2019 #55
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Sep 2019 #58
What are You Proposing? dlk Sep 2019 #59
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Sep 2019 #62
+1000 Nevermypresident Sep 2019 #70
So hard to even imagine doing all that again when Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2019 #110
We the People hold the ultimate power yet. Grasswire2 Sep 2019 #119
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Sep 2019 #120
How is that related? nt FBaggins Sep 2019 #71
He won't be able to put up a nominee if TheSocialDem Sep 2019 #73
That's not true. StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #74
Oh, well, not sure where I heard that but I could be wrong. TheSocialDem Sep 2019 #78
It's a common misconception floating around the internet StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #80
Um... sure he will FBaggins Sep 2019 #75
Exhausting to say the least. gordianot Sep 2019 #25
What program? bucolic_frolic Sep 2019 #26
Not judgement. Just official impeachment inquiry TheSocialDem Sep 2019 #32
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Sep 2019 #57
Right? I know exactly two people Bettie Sep 2019 #81
Exactly! Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2019 #114
I have to disagree with this gay texan Sep 2019 #29
Exactly, Pelosi has All of the Responsibility but Not All of the Authority dlk Sep 2019 #34
If Hillary had acted like Corey, the GOP would have the Sergeant-at-arms arrest her on the spot. SunSeeker Sep 2019 #35
yawn obamanut2012 Sep 2019 #36
I would also like a clear unequivocal statement because then a bunch of folks might stop... CaptainTruth Sep 2019 #38
But they wouldn't StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #45
+1,000,000 Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2019 #115
There isn't a majority in the House that supports impeachment Jose Garcia Sep 2019 #39
+1, not only that but it'd be best to go through the drawn out process during election. Take away uponit7771 Sep 2019 #77
Who is this "we" that you are speaking of dansolo Sep 2019 #41
You don't know if he's committed impeachable offenses? TheSocialDem Sep 2019 #42
What? brutus smith Sep 2019 #49
I'm saying we all know he has.. and the path to impeachment TheSocialDem Sep 2019 #65
We don't actually all know this StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #76
Oh please.... those no votes re impeachment are from red/purple districts. Nevermypresident Sep 2019 #89
So? FBaggins Sep 2019 #94
THAT'S your response? StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #102
No we have the majority because Trump is a Toxic douchebag standingtall Sep 2019 #66
Yes. She should Bettie Sep 2019 #83
we always required moderates or even conservatives in order to have a majority JI7 Sep 2019 #91
K & R! 50 Shades Of Blue Sep 2019 #56
I'm sure anonymous bloggers know best brooklynite Sep 2019 #72
any interest at all in holding the House? (nt) stopdiggin Sep 2019 #82
Agreed. Respectfully I do not want Pelosi gldstwmn Sep 2019 #84
Plus we haven't protected the 2020 vote so asking Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2019 #118
Recommended democrank Sep 2019 #87
she won't Skittles Sep 2019 #101
Speaker Pelosi is providing interference and time Baked Potato Sep 2019 #105
I am sick of it too tymorial Sep 2019 #106
K & R Duppers Sep 2019 #109
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ok Nancy... get with the ...»Reply #94