Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(122,030 posts)
27. I think that there are more that benefit than just the "very few."
Wed Apr 8, 2020, 11:15 PM
Apr 2020

Yes, you may have to pay premiums, co-pays, and deductibles and it appears the fact that you also have to pay them has lead you not to visit the doctor on frivolous occasions. I consider that to be a very good thing that many people benefit from. It means that we keep the staffing levels at hospitals at reasonable ratios instead of being over-staffed--I know that for a fact because my brother is a respiratory therapist who used to sleep on the job when he worked at a hospital.

Do we really want to double or triple the number of hospital workers when they aren't actually doing any work or caring for patients? Do we spend more money educating physicians that aren't actually needed? That seems like a tremendous waste of resources that offers little to no benefit to society. I've personally worked in positions where I was no longer needed and there is nothing more psychologically depressing than to go to a job where the only thing to do was busy work or writing procedure manuals.

Griping about an insurance company making a profit seems very petty in my opinion--we don't condemn other businesses that make profits at rates that far exceed the profit levels of health insurance companies. All of the current policyholders benefit (not the "very few&quot whether or not they meet their annual deductibles because the insurance companies verify the credentials of the providers and adjust their networks to ensure quality care--that is something not likely to occur in a government run system where the incentive is to find the lowest cost provider (which already occurs in practices that no longer accept Medicare and Medicaid patients because of the low reimbursement rates). The current insurance system also allows for adjustments much more rapidly to changing conditions versus a system where every health care worker is a government employee who are essentially given jobs for life with the possibility that they may never be needed. What a drain on society! I think that pain would extend much farther than the pain because some people file bankruptcies.

I've been on private insurance (gold-level plans) and government health care plans (barely enough to sustain my life, but I'm five years overdue for a colonoscopy). The difference in quality of care was evident and I would certainly enjoy having the private insurance again so you will definitely not find me complaining about private health insurance even if it isn't perfect.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Forcing millions more to drop their insurance duforsure Apr 2020 #1
+1 dalton99a Apr 2020 #28
Incompetence ProfessorGAC Apr 2020 #2
If only there were some other way to Voltaire2 Apr 2020 #3
Many ways to get to affordable, universal coverage, but the profit Celerity Apr 2020 #4
If you like your insurance you can keep it. That's a joke. My grandson had insurance from his job. Autumn Apr 2020 #5
You're misrepresenting what that statement meant TEN years ago. What it meant is that... George II Apr 2020 #8
Misrepresenting nothing. I stated a fact. We already know insurance though your job, like it or not Autumn Apr 2020 #9
You're quoting (paraphrasing) President Obama from back in 2010, and his intention was.... George II Apr 2020 #11
You know how it is George. Everybody LOVES their insurance through their job and wants to keep it. Autumn Apr 2020 #16
I think thats a republican talking point Tribetime Apr 2020 #10
No, I think what I responded to was a republican talking point, saying exactly.... George II Apr 2020 #12
I could be wrong Tribetime Apr 2020 #13
. George II Apr 2020 #14
k&r for exposure. n/t Laelth Apr 2020 #6
A proactive government would be out in front of this. crickets Apr 2020 #7
We can't afford for profit health care... Please dont JCMach1 Apr 2020 #15
But can we afford M4A? TexasTowelie Apr 2020 #17
Other countries manage to afford it Bettie Apr 2020 #18
Wrong. TexasTowelie Apr 2020 #19
Well then, I guess we should just Bettie Apr 2020 #20
And that type of hyperbole is why Bernie won't be the nominee. TexasTowelie Apr 2020 #23
Not a Sanders supporter Bettie Apr 2020 #24
Oh geez. TexasTowelie Apr 2020 #25
I'm glad you are happy with our system Bettie Apr 2020 #26
I think that there are more that benefit than just the "very few." TexasTowelie Apr 2020 #27
We can't afford not too... We are getting low quality and/or non-existent care for a big part of JCMach1 Apr 2020 #30
I think that people examined the costs of universal health care TexasTowelie Apr 2020 #31
The American people support M4A, or Single Payer JCMach1 Apr 2020 #32
As you are probably aware TexasTowelie Apr 2020 #33
This would be a good time for Joe Biden to recommend Single Payer or M4All. eom. Alex4Martinez Apr 2020 #21
this is a crock of shit........... Takket Apr 2020 #22
Data on Spending For Non-CV-19 Treatment Has Plummented @ A Large Employer I support Indykatie Apr 2020 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT : Insurance premiums ...»Reply #27