Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Recursion

(56,582 posts)

2. He also owned more guns than Malcolm X

Reply to G_j (Reply #1)

Sun May 31, 2020, 07:52 AM

May 2020

And Gandhi outlined the principles of ahimsa. But non-violence having principles is not the same as non-violence being a principle. It's a tactic, adopted for a specific situation.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If non-violence were universally effective, the police would be using it right now [View all] Recursion May 2020 OP

MLK Jr. called them principles G_j May 2020 #1

He also owned more guns than Malcolm X Recursion May 2020 #2

not sure how to see this then.. G_j May 2020 #4

he wasn't a pacifist bigtree May 2020 #6

Often humans run into threats so great that non-violence alone simply ends up w/ you dead in a ditch Celerity May 2020 #7

Gandhi himself did not beleive in universal non-violence. Celerity May 2020 #3

Yup. And he was awarded for bravery in the Zulu war (nt) Recursion May 2020 #5