Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

mcar

(45,131 posts)

5. I have not had that impression

Reply to ecstatic (Original post)

Tue Mar 30, 2021, 09:11 PM

Mar 2021

Yes, he scolded Ms. Hansen, but, from an objective perspective, it wasn't unwarranted.

Don't get me wrong, she was amazing. But, she obviously had had enough of the defense attorney's insinuations, inane questions, and innuendo and she let him know it.

The last thing a judge should be doing is seeming to be partisan toward anyone. That way leads to an appeal.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge Cahill needs to be replaced [View all] ecstatic Mar 2021 OP

Cahill is a very experienced judge with a long-standing reputation for fairness Ocelot II Mar 2021 #1

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Mar 2021 #2

Cahill doesn't need fifteen minutes of fame. He's a well-respected judge Ocelot II Mar 2021 #3

The defense asked if people were swearing ecstatic Mar 2021 #4

Did her response answer the question asked? Ms. Toad Mar 2021 #15

I have not had that impression mcar Mar 2021 #5

also the defense tried to lessen or keep out a lot of the information from IcyPeas Mar 2021 #6

ok. Maybe I need to catch up with all the rest of the testimony ecstatic Mar 2021 #8

As I really, Argumentative" testimony has a specialc legal meaning.. Dream Girl Mar 2021 #7

People are learning in real-time what actually goes on in a trial, and it ain't like on TV. WhiskeyGrinder Mar 2021 #9

It's a great opportunity for the public to see how trials really work. Ocelot II Mar 2021 #10

I've testified in court and you couldn't be more right. Phoenix61 Mar 2021 #11

I'd like a lawyer type to weigh in, but here is my read: rgbecker Mar 2021 #12

Without knowing more about this, I would think that the statements Ocelot II Mar 2021 #13

I'm a lawyer and I can't stand watching a legal type show. Solomon Mar 2021 #16

Sounds like my dad. TV trials drove him nuts. Ocelot II Mar 2021 #17

Nope. Ms. Toad Mar 2021 #14

But... WAS she argumentative? WarGamer Mar 2021 #18