Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ms. Toad

(37,534 posts)
14. Nope.
Tue Mar 30, 2021, 10:31 PM
Mar 2021

It is the judge's responsiblity to ensure that the court process runs according to the rules.

Several times the EMT talked over the attorneys from both sides, argued with defense counsel, and argued with the judge. She continued to argue with him as he was explaining that she is not permitted to argue with him. (That's the prosecution's role, if the judge is not acting properly.)

The judge excused the jury for the day (so they were not prejudiced by him explaining the rules to her), and then quite properly reminded her of the rules of the court.

Answer only what is asked - if there is more to be said the prosecution has the ablity to ask follow-up questions.
When you are told to stop talkng - stop talkng. Don't launch into an explanation of why you continued.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge Cahill needs to be ...»Reply #14