Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(52,013 posts)

3. I don't think so

Tue Aug 24, 2021, 07:09 AM

Aug 2021

It's a category of criminal activity adequately covered by existing laws, if they are applied.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Does Merrick Garland need to appoint a Special prosecutor now? [View all] duforsure Aug 2021 OP

Does he need to? Certainly. Will he? RVN VET71 Aug 2021 #1

Merrick Garland Maine Abu El Banat Aug 2021 #2

I don't think so bucolic_frolic Aug 2021 #3

No. Why would he? FBaggins Aug 2021 #6

I believe he's already overwhelmed, duforsure Aug 2021 #8

Special prosecutors aren't caused by busy AG's FBaggins Aug 2021 #9

With the likelihood the former guy and the Gop's involvement, duforsure Aug 2021 #12

Should? Probably Bettie Aug 2021 #10

Sadly, I think you may be correct. Evolve Dammit Aug 2021 #11

+1 n/t area51 Aug 2021 #13