Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Ex-Trumpers Are Trying To Exonerate Themselves. We Must Not Let Them. [View all]
Trump's former White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham is attempting self-absolution by publishing a tell-all book.https://thebanter.substack.com/p/ex-trumpers-are-trying-to-exonerate

WASHINGTON, DC -- Before we dig in today, a little about me: I truly despise contributing to a Trump loyalists attempt at self-absolution after four years of tyrannical idiocracy in the White House. Yet what were going to discuss here is too important to ignore. The aforementioned self-absolution is exactly what former White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham is attempting to do with her new tell-all book about her time working for Trump, the first one-term loser in 30 years. Well cover a few revelations in the book that are noteworthy and, if true, add to the validity of what weve been saying about Grishams former boss for more than six years. Before we get to the big items, there are, of course, a few silly and bizarre things from the book:

The uh, yes sir is an example of the self-absolution Im talking about here. Its clearly an attempt by Grisham to backpedal away from her former boss. In this case, her nonplussed quote is meant to stir up empathy in the reader. She sounds so confused and annoyed, were meant to think. Meanwhile, Grisham discusses two instances in which Trump cozied up to dictators. First, the obvious linkage between Trump and Putin is further vindicated. During the G20 summit in Osaka, Japan, Trump was due to meet in private with Vladimir Putin. But before they held their one-on-one meeting, Trump described his planned charade to the Russian autocrat: Okay, Im going to act a little tougher with you for a few minutes. But its for the cameras, and after they leave well talk. You understand. The most important phrases here are act a little tougher, which clearly underscores the fact that Trumps true intention was to kiss Putins ass in the meeting, and its for the cameras. He might as well have belted out a rendition of Memory from Cats -- I mean, as long as hes putting on a phony-baloney show, why not a shabby cat costume and a song, too?
Likewise, any perceived toughness was all an act -- a shitty, flimsy act since Trump was never, ever a little tougher with Putin. The closest he ever came was saying, And probably no one has been tougher to Russia than Donald Trump, which isnt an indication of toughness at all, especially since he hedged with the probably tossed in there. Nevertheless, here we have a Trump White House insider further establishing that Trump was desperate to keep Putin as happy as possible, going so far as to tell Putin that even a minor display of toughness was all bullshit. Why? I think we all know, and hopefully the Department of Justice will get around to presenting Trumps dozen instances of criminal obstruction of justice, per the Mueller Report, to a grand jury. Grisham also reported that Trump was obsessed with moving the press out of the James Brady briefing room in the West Wing. Obviously, Trump considers the press to be the enemy of the people and so on -- the same old fake news meme. But it was a trip to North Korea that ultimately inspired Trump to order Grisham to work on a new location. Yes, the oppressive communist dictatorship was inspirational to Trump, manifesting an attack against the free press clause of the First Amendment.
Accompanying the story is another one of Grishams attempts at self-absolution to reverse-thrusters away from Trump. In this case, she wrote: I researched different places we could put them other than the press briefing room. Each time the president asked me about my progress on the matter, I let him know I was still working on options. She gave him a non-answer answer, and as we all know, the press was never removed from the White House. To be clear: its critical that we continue to hear from former Trump staffers and especially reputable journalists like Bob Woodward and Robert Costa about what happened. At the very least, its a matter of writing the accurate history of this ongoing political emergency. But where were Grisham and the others while Trump was president? Why werent they brave enough to step forward with what they knew? The fullness of the historical record is crucial here, make no mistake, but waiting to go public after hes gone (for now) only serves the self-interests of the author. Do not forgive or forget what co-conspirators and apparatchiks like Grisham helped to manifest. Theyre speaking out now, but while they had a chance to make a difference, they refused to speak. After all, theres book money to be made after the fact, right? As Ella Wheeler Wilcox wrote: To sin by silence, when we should protest, makes cowards out of men.
snip
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Ex-Trumpers Are Trying To Exonerate Themselves. We Must Not Let Them. [View all]
Celerity
Oct 2021
OP
Alyssa Farah on the View tomorrow - Former Trump White House communications director
IcyPeas
Oct 2021
#2
Could just be the cover story, to keep Pence from stepping forward for the reins . . .
Journeyman
Oct 2021
#7
Right, the former guy delegated a task to her and followed up from time to time?
gratuitous
Oct 2021
#6