Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Syntara

(39 posts)
9. Like you, I have a problem with 'recent' religions
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 12:12 AM
Oct 2012

The reason why I have a problem with what I term 'recent' religions is that, as in the case of Mormonism, the founders and the adherents have no problem making leaps in time to bring two or more diverse elements together to tell a story, for example.

Romney believes that The Second Coming will occur simultaneously in Israel and in Missouri. I get the Israel part, but I have problems with the Missouri part. I guess because Israel is ancient and Missouri is a rather recent invention. Why Missouri, I want to know? Jesus was most definitely associated with Israel, so that part makes sense. What doesn't make sense is how someone in the Mormon faith determined that Jesus is also related to Missouri.

Perhaps my problem is that I just don't know enough about Mormon doctrine, but on the surface it does seem a tad farcical to me.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Joseph Smith was a huckster and a con man - a 19th-century L. Ron Hubbard. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2012 #1
I guess the silly stuff that was made up 2,000 years ago is more familiar Arugula Latte Oct 2012 #2
Not only that, but there's been 2000 years to weed some of the craziness out. Barack_America Oct 2012 #5
I guess, although the belief that a dead virgin-born Nazarene guy from 33 A.D. is going to Arugula Latte Oct 2012 #8
LOL, I did stop to think, and that's why I could never be Christian. Barack_America Oct 2012 #13
Islam is more similar to Christianity than Mormonism. iemitsu Oct 2012 #16
I have respect for all religions in general quinnox Oct 2012 #3
Did you forget about Jim Jones or David Koresh? L0oniX Oct 2012 #4
true, there are always exceptions quinnox Oct 2012 #6
It may be a matter of what someone considers to be a cult. L0oniX Oct 2012 #11
I have no respect for religions, but I have respect for people who believe things... immoderate Oct 2012 #7
Like you, I have a problem with 'recent' religions Syntara Oct 2012 #9
I don't care what they do or believe but I won't be a pawn. nolabear Oct 2012 #10
The newer the religion, the dumber the religion Schema Thing Oct 2012 #12
I completely relate to your points. rudycantfail Oct 2012 #14
I understand what you are saying d_r Oct 2012 #15
True. Mormons do operate in a tradition. cthulu2016 Oct 2012 #17
The recent genesis of the Mormon faith is a valid aspect to consider iemitsu Oct 2012 #18
I got to thinking about Mormonism tonight TlalocW Oct 2012 #19
. cthulu2016 Oct 2012 #20
. cthulu2016 Oct 2012 #23
All new ideas must run the gauntlet of public scrutiny. Some hold up, others don't. reformist2 Oct 2012 #21
Re-Baptising the dead as Mormons is just plain wrong. KurtNYC Oct 2012 #22
Indeed, Sir: the 'Grand-Father Clause' The Magistrate Oct 2012 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sympathy toward unusual R...»Reply #9