Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

iemitsu

(3,888 posts)
18. The recent genesis of the Mormon faith is a valid aspect to consider
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 01:06 AM
Oct 2012

when evaluating the religion and its adherents.
Religion/Myth is a cultural universal found in every culture, in every time. Religions (if you believe them) or Myths (if you don't believe them) serve several purposes in society. They explain the unexplained, they provide rules to guide social life, and they oversee (legitimize) rites of passage in the lives of individuals and communities.
While a new faith, like the Mormon Church, can provide rules to live by and legitimize celebrations it was born in an age of enlightenment. We did not need a new faith to explain things.
Science was a known, available, and superior methodology for explaining the unexplained and older, established churches provided faith models for understanding the universe for those who distrusted science.
A new faith model for understanding simply was not and is not needed, especially one that is confusing and weird and doesn't clarify anything about the world.
This alone makes Mormons suspect. What is their real mission? To save or to shun?
Are they a business plan? Why do they insist that they are part of the Judeo-Christian tradition when neither Jews or Christians recognize them as such?
Since Romney's nomination, I have become more familiar with some of the LDS doctrine than I was earlier.
I still have many questions.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Joseph Smith was a huckster and a con man - a 19th-century L. Ron Hubbard. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2012 #1
I guess the silly stuff that was made up 2,000 years ago is more familiar Arugula Latte Oct 2012 #2
Not only that, but there's been 2000 years to weed some of the craziness out. Barack_America Oct 2012 #5
I guess, although the belief that a dead virgin-born Nazarene guy from 33 A.D. is going to Arugula Latte Oct 2012 #8
LOL, I did stop to think, and that's why I could never be Christian. Barack_America Oct 2012 #13
Islam is more similar to Christianity than Mormonism. iemitsu Oct 2012 #16
I have respect for all religions in general quinnox Oct 2012 #3
Did you forget about Jim Jones or David Koresh? L0oniX Oct 2012 #4
true, there are always exceptions quinnox Oct 2012 #6
It may be a matter of what someone considers to be a cult. L0oniX Oct 2012 #11
I have no respect for religions, but I have respect for people who believe things... immoderate Oct 2012 #7
Like you, I have a problem with 'recent' religions Syntara Oct 2012 #9
I don't care what they do or believe but I won't be a pawn. nolabear Oct 2012 #10
The newer the religion, the dumber the religion Schema Thing Oct 2012 #12
I completely relate to your points. rudycantfail Oct 2012 #14
I understand what you are saying d_r Oct 2012 #15
True. Mormons do operate in a tradition. cthulu2016 Oct 2012 #17
The recent genesis of the Mormon faith is a valid aspect to consider iemitsu Oct 2012 #18
I got to thinking about Mormonism tonight TlalocW Oct 2012 #19
. cthulu2016 Oct 2012 #20
. cthulu2016 Oct 2012 #23
All new ideas must run the gauntlet of public scrutiny. Some hold up, others don't. reformist2 Oct 2012 #21
Re-Baptising the dead as Mormons is just plain wrong. KurtNYC Oct 2012 #22
Indeed, Sir: the 'Grand-Father Clause' The Magistrate Oct 2012 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sympathy toward unusual R...»Reply #18