And here we go, another week gone by and Bannon still not complying with the subpoena or

[Escurumbele]

27. Interesting but the reasons given by the author do not seem to justify the speed as it is being

processed.

As I have said before, I am relying in part from Glenn Kirshner's comments on this, he was a prosecutor for 30 years, he understands what is involved, and he is not happy at what is happening.

Garland's comments are not encouraging either.

Thank you for providing the link.

From the link:
Bannon’s claim that executive privilege prevents his testimony has faced a great deal of ridicule. Donald Trump, as a federal judge put it yesterday, is “not president,” and the current president has not asserted privilege over Bannon’s testimony. Bannon was not even an executive branch official at the relevant time, and the privilege—whatever its true contours—cannot cover podcast hosts. And Bannon has refused even to show up for testimony in response to the subpoena. Executive privilege does not excuse a witness from appearing in the first place; it merely protects testimony. The witness has to show up and assert privilege in response to specific questions.