Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This is from the Supreme Court over 100 years ago: [View all]Bernardo de La Paz
(49,252 posts)7. Wrong. You have stated a Right Wing talking point
If there's even one person not vaxxed, it's all for nothing
Wrong, wrong, wrong.
Most obviously, if there is only one person not vaxxed, they wouldn't be infecting anybody. But it seems logic did not occur to you.
The goal, as things have developed and turned out, is to have about 80% of all citizens 12 or over vaccinated. 100% is not needed to achieve herd immunity, especially as some in the 20% will have acquired some immunity by surviving a Covid infection.
The REAL GOAL is to get 75-80% global vaccination to deny breeding grounds for mutated variants.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Evil people will always find ways to twist everything good into something negative
SunImp
Dec 2021
#10
Both are band-aid solutions. How about re-examining the nomination/confirmation process.
jaxexpat
Dec 2021
#29
this is a keeper, maybe someone should send this to certain SCOTUS justices
msfiddlestix
Dec 2021
#33