Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

moniss

(7,948 posts)
6. Agreed
Sat Jan 8, 2022, 02:02 PM
Jan 2022

but I am fairly certain that no matter what gets passed for voting rights, if anything, will be immediately challenged in an expedited fashion to the Supreme Court. They will ask for an injunction until the case is decided and the GQP members on the court will likely grant that request. The Supremes will slow walk any decision until after the mid-terms. Voting rights needed to be the first item on the agenda rather than the afterthought status it seems to have been given. In other words although we might not want to confront the reality of permanent GQP control it appears to be here. The coming mid-terms will see accusations by wingnuts of "problems" in elections in some state(s) and the nullification of the voters will be put into play. A dry run for 2024.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WaPo: Manchin's $1.8 tril...»Reply #6