Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They are a permanent member. Caliman73 Mar 2022 #1
Things are permanent until they're not. nt Atticus Mar 2022 #2
Russia would simply veto any attempt to take them off the Security Council. Dial H For Hero Mar 2022 #11
That's the key: China H2O Man Mar 2022 #21
Perhaps. Caliman73 Mar 2022 #13
It is unlikely because it takes a unanimous vote to kick Russia out. Irony: At the time allegorical oracle Mar 2022 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author Mary in S. Carolina Mar 2022 #32
This message was self-deleted by its author Mary in S. Carolina Mar 2022 #18
I imagine it is possible. Caliman73 Mar 2022 #24
Was it not the USSR that was the permanent member ? nt delisen Mar 2022 #19
Yes, but that seat was apparently voted on to be passed to Russia. Caliman73 Mar 2022 #23
As I understand it, the Soviet Union was a permanent member. 11 Bravo Mar 2022 #34
I suppose that will be addressed. Caliman73 Mar 2022 #35
They're one of the five declared nuclear powers Spider Jerusalem Mar 2022 #3
No so... OneBlueDotS-Carolina Mar 2022 #12
Like I said (the US, UK, France, Russia and China are the five declared nuclear powers) Spider Jerusalem Mar 2022 #16
The only nuclear power when the UN was founded... OneBlueDotS-Carolina Mar 2022 #28
Utter nonsense. It does not buy a perm't seat. There are declared nuc powers that do not have seats. Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2022 #17
No, there aren't ("declared nuclear powers" refers to signatories of the Nonproliferation Treaty) Spider Jerusalem Mar 2022 #20
Your contention is still utter nonsense. If one signed, they would not get a seat. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2022 #22
Exactly. question I asked earlier.. I don't know how this work, but this seems anathema to the point msfiddlestix Mar 2022 #4
"what the UN is supposed to be about" Pantagruel Mar 2022 #8
That is the history and why it's reputation is so easily damaged.. perfect example as in the past. msfiddlestix Mar 2022 #14
Indeed, Ukraine is challenging this also relayerbob Mar 2022 #5
USSR had a seat that Russia took over SheltieLover Mar 2022 #6
They voted China (PROC) into The Repubic of China's, seat in 1971. OneBlueDotS-Carolina Mar 2022 #29
A few days ago the Ukraine Rep at the UN JustAnotherGen Mar 2022 #7
Short answer: Russia has 20,000 nuclear weapons. bluewater Mar 2022 #9
Not even close. Russia has 6,257 nuclear warheads of which 1,456 are currently deployed. Nevilledog Mar 2022 #26
You are correct the US and Russia both have about 1,600 nuclear warheads deployed bluewater Mar 2022 #27
The UN is useful as a place to blow off steam Tetrachloride Mar 2022 #10
Like installing a famous bank robber as sheriff. Wingus Dingus Mar 2022 #15
👍 Joinfortmill Mar 2022 #25
The UN is a useless bureaucracy and has been for many many years. Bev54 Mar 2022 #31
It is an interesting Question. The Soviet Union had a seat there. Not Russia. nt Gore1FL Mar 2022 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In as civil a manner as I...»Reply #16