Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)

15. +1

Reply to TomSlick (Reply #12)

Fri Mar 4, 2022, 01:26 AM

Mar 2022

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I heard the first crack in the US obligation under Article V of the NATO treaty. [View all] TomSlick Mar 2022 OP

I'm positive an attack on NATO member will be answered. Hoyt Mar 2022 #1

Oh no doubt! PortTack Mar 2022 #21

I heard that interview, there was no mention of Article 5, and our obligation. dem4decades Mar 2022 #2

You caused me to re-read my OP. TomSlick Mar 2022 #11

He can wonder all he wants. EndlessWire Mar 2022 #19

President Biden made it very clear that we will honor our NATO commitment PortTack Mar 2022 #22

That's the point: you didn't "hear the first crack" as your thread title claimed muriel_volestrangler Mar 2022 #26

Any attack on NATO countries territory and it will be on like Donkey Kong including all of the newer kelly1mm Mar 2022 #3

Who said this: Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #4

Neither O'Donnell or Robinson said that their argument would apply if a NATO country was attacked. TomSlick Mar 2022 #12

+1 Laura PourMeADrink Mar 2022 #15

Well, that's wild speculation on your part. NoRethugFriends Mar 2022 #5

Of course we would meet our treaty obligations. enki23 Mar 2022 #6

Wesley Clark said if Putin attacked the Baltic states, they're so small it would be over for them Karadeniz Mar 2022 #7

I think I've heard NATO troops are already in the Balkins left-of-center2012 Mar 2022 #9

Thank you ... PSPS Mar 2022 #16

Well EndlessWire Mar 2022 #18

Sorry that's bullshit... orwell Mar 2022 #20

thank you. the hand wringing, and hyperventilation is getting annoying. stopdiggin Mar 2022 #25

I agree. Thinking about it, Clark must've meant that the damage would occur before we could Karadeniz Mar 2022 #27

Mmmmm... yes BUT WarGamer Mar 2022 #23

It takes weeks to stage for an invasion. NutmegYankee Mar 2022 #31

Laurence O'Donnell is stuck in the 50s and 60s... AntiFascist Mar 2022 #8

It is interesting how you know what putin will and wont do. Eko Mar 2022 #10

When someone shows you who they are, believe them. TomSlick Mar 2022 #13

I don't think there is anyone here EndlessWire Mar 2022 #17

My first thought when I watched O'Donnell's screed was, Is Lawrence O'Donnell the reincarnation... wackadoo wabbit Mar 2022 #14

You heard no such thing. Neither one of these gentleman stopdiggin Mar 2022 #24

This talk of cowering because Putin has nukes, has got to stop. lagomorph777 Mar 2022 #28

Agreed inthewind21 Mar 2022 #34

Why does everyone assume that imposing a no-fly zone means WWIII? Happy Hoosier Mar 2022 #29

Because a no-fly zone means attacking Russian ground-to-air missile launchers, and planes muriel_volestrangler Mar 2022 #32

I respect those two gentlemen but they aren't policy makers. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2022 #30

This OP - not factual opinion only. Tommymac Mar 2022 #33

I suggest you turn off the TV inthewind21 Mar 2022 #35

NATO just rejected calls for a no-fly zone over Ukraine, US backs NATO, not war with Russia Shanti Shanti Shanti Mar 2022 #36

No, Putin will not attack a NATO country Azathoth Mar 2022 #37