Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(51,407 posts)
6. I disagree, it is not a new thing, and there have been public displays that show the problem
Thu Apr 14, 2022, 12:32 PM
Apr 2022

I voted for Kevin de León in both the 2018 primary and the general, as I could see the writing on the wall. He got the most votes ever (over 5 million) for any losing Senate candidate in US history, but it just was not enough.

Feinstein already conceded, via her own actions, (stepping down as the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee) that there is a problem.


Dianne Feinstein's Missteps Raise a Painful Age Question Among Senate Democrats.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/dianne-feinsteins-missteps-raise-a-painful-age-question-among-senate-democrats

In a hearing on November 17th, Dianne Feinstein, the senior Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, who, at eighty-seven, is the oldest member of the Senate, grilled a witness. Reading from a sheaf of prepared papers, she asked Jack Dorsey, the C.E.O. of Twitter, whether his company was doing enough to stem the spread of disinformation. Elaborating, she read in full a tweet that President Trump had disseminated on November 7th, falsely claiming to have won the Presidential election. She then asked Dorsey if Twitter’s labelling of the tweet as disputed had adequately alerted readers that it was a bald lie.

It was a good question. Feinstein seemed sharp and focussed. For decades, she has been the epitome of a female trailblazer in Washington, always hyper-prepared. But this time, after Dorsey responded, Feinstein asked him the same question again, reading it word for word, along with the Trump tweet. Her inflection was eerily identical. Feinstein looked and sounded just as authoritative, seemingly registering no awareness that she was repeating herself verbatim. Dorsey graciously answered the question all over again.

Social media was less polite. A conservative Web site soon posted a clip of the humiliating moment on YouTube, under the headline “Senator Feinstein just asked the same question twice and didn’t realize she did it,” adding an emoji of someone covering his face with his hand in shame, along with bright red type proclaiming “Time to Retire!!” Six days later, under growing pressure from progressive groups who were already outraged by her faltering management of Amy Coney Barrett’s Supreme Court confirmation hearing, Feinstein released a statement announcing that she would step down from the Democrats’ senior position, while continuing as a non-ranking member of the committee. Feinstein’s office declined to comment for this article.

snip

But many others familiar with Feinstein’s situation describe her as seriously struggling, and say it has been evident for several years. Speaking on background, and with respect for her accomplished career, they say her short-term memory has grown so poor that she often forgets she has been briefed on a topic, accusing her staff of failing to do so just after they have. They describe Feinstein as forgetting what she has said and getting upset when she can’t keep up. One aide to another senator described what he called a “Kabuki” meeting in which Feinstein’s staff tried to steer her through a proposed piece of legislation that she protested was “just words” which “make no sense.” Feinstein’s staff has said that sometimes she seems herself, and other times unreachable. “The staff is in such a bad position,” a former Senate aide who still has business in Congress said. “They have to defend her and make her seem normal.”

snip

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wonder who that was... 2naSalit Apr 2022 #1
they added this, but I have not a clue who it was Celerity Apr 2022 #4
These are perilous times. We're seeing an ongoing threat by authoritarians to take over jalan48 Apr 2022 #2
not concerned enough about 'authoritarianism' to propose ONE man fill her seat bigtree Apr 2022 #11
I see no reason to bumble along for two years. The Governor will appoint a Democrat and jalan48 Apr 2022 #12
where has she 'bumbled' her actual job? bigtree Apr 2022 #14
No problem. It will be what it is. I'm glad we have a Democratic Governor to appoint a jalan48 Apr 2022 #15
Also she just lost her husband recently to cancer kimbutgar Apr 2022 #3
And that's the thing. 2naSalit Apr 2022 #5
I disagree, it is not a new thing, and there have been public displays that show the problem Celerity Apr 2022 #6
I forget I think I also voted for de Leon. kimbutgar Apr 2022 #22
Speaker Pelosi quoted bigtree Apr 2022 #21
If this is true, they need to address this with her privately and directly. Media leaks are cowardly Raven123 Apr 2022 #7
That's why I question it. 2naSalit Apr 2022 #9
this has been going on for multiple years now, and I am sure there have been private attempts Celerity Apr 2022 #10
What if people have addressed it and it's not getting thru? BradAllison Apr 2022 #18
that likely is happening, look at the large pushback (mostly from her staff) Celerity Apr 2022 #19
Beyond the fair discussion of ageism, is the FACT we need sharp Dems fighting atm Arazi Apr 2022 #8
It's not a fair dscussion because it isn't ageism Spider Jerusalem Apr 2022 #13
+1 Celerity Apr 2022 #17
Yup, good distinction Arazi Apr 2022 #20
We are going to be busy if we are worrying about senators mentally unfit to serve. Sneederbunk Apr 2022 #16
Probably from the party of Strom Thurmond kskiska Apr 2022 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SF Chronicle: Colleagues ...»Reply #6