Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: And people wonder why we're skeptical about DOJ prosecuting trump et al. Ask James Clyburn: [View all]Colbert
(46 posts)70. More Concerned With Jury Composition
Clyburn seems concerned about carryovers from the previous administration holding the prosecution up. Really, that's the concern? If I were the prosecutor I'd be more concerned about getting a conviction, otherwise why bother? All is takes is one juror holding out to keep a conviction from happening. If you have a truly representative jury, 47% of the jurors will be Trump supporters (who are idealistically rabid). And you might be thinking, "Well, DC is really anti-Trump (he only got 5.4% of the vote in 2020)" - but that's the same rationale any competent defense lawyer would use for a change of venue. Do you really need, or want, a show trial ending in a hung jury?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
78 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

And people wonder why we're skeptical about DOJ prosecuting trump et al. Ask James Clyburn: [View all]
SoonerPride
Jun 2022
OP
Why wouldn't the tweet be accurate? It was a quote taken from his appearance on CNN.
SoonerPride
Jun 2022
#16
And does that hold up against the reports that most of the Trump era attorneys at DOJ are gone
Just A Box Of Rain
Jun 2022
#19
None of the Trump era holdovers have authority over the J6 investigations/prosecutions
Fiendish Thingy
Jun 2022
#50
So for a prosecution this big and this important Garland can't figure out if someone under him
jalan48
Jun 2022
#13
They should have cleaned house and removed the Trump trash after inauguration
dalton99a
Jun 2022
#23
Garland inherited a snake pit. Looking at you Bill 'nothing to see here/ Barr.
Joinfortmill
Jun 2022
#30
Does anyone here have solid information about how many Trump hold-over attorneys
Just A Box Of Rain
Jun 2022
#38
No, but according to the OP they are going to block the investigation into Trump.
fightforfreedom
Jun 2022
#46
I highly commend you and others for engaging the doom and gloom crowd here,
MarineCombatEngineer
Jun 2022
#64
This would all go away if we had any indication that DOJ is doing anything about Trump
Orrex
Jun 2022
#45
I know, Trump and his inner circle should have been indicted the moment Garland took office.
fightforfreedom
Jun 2022
#49
Prosecutors who follow the rule of law build cases before they go indicting people.
Just A Box Of Rain
Jun 2022
#52
Interpreting someone else's comments without the full information is always fraught with the
Lonestarblue
Jun 2022
#71
Perhaps you can show me any place on the entire internet where I've made that assertion?
Orrex
Jun 2022
#68
It's not an either or. Prosecuting bad actors shows where the system weaknesses are
meadowlander
Jun 2022
#73
IMO DOJ has never been interested in imprisoning rich white politically-connected people
pecosbob
Jun 2022
#76