Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

BannonsLiver

(16,542 posts)

9. Doesn't really change much with me

Reply to NewHendoLib (Original post)

Fri Nov 18, 2022, 05:55 PM

Nov 2022

I had zero expectations Trump would ever be held accountable for his many alleged crimes and I still have no expectations that he will be held accountable. That’s less of a commentary on Garland, who I’m sure is entirely competent, and more of a commentary on how we do things here.
However, I do see some value in the SC approach. I just don’t think it changes the ending to the story.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

DU temp check on the Garland - Special Counsel news [View all] NewHendoLib Nov 2022 OP

Ocelot says it's good. SheltieLover Nov 2022 #1

This message was self-deleted by its author maxsolomon Nov 2022 #2

thank you! NewHendoLib Nov 2022 #4

A very good thing. H2O Man Nov 2022 #3

I voted not a good thing, but I don't like the reasoning why. W_HAMILTON Nov 2022 #5

It's the Cyrus Vance gambit. Unexpected, but does the job Scrivener7 Nov 2022 #6

I'd go for a "fabulous" thing, but had to settle for "good." Just A Box Of Rain Nov 2022 #7

My hope? "Too soon to tell". My gut reaction? "This is not a good thing." n/t Silent3 Nov 2022 #8

Doesn't really change much with me BannonsLiver Nov 2022 #9

It's not a good thing iemanja Nov 2022 #10